Feminism is the advent of the destruction of females. Females today are grossly inferior to their mothers and their female ancestors. It was once true, at the same period that a child could be safely cultivated in a nuclear family unit. These children in turn would grow into a family of their own and the stability of such gave us some of the finest and most intellectually cultivated men and women on planet earth. Now, let's flash to the present. Today, many a women complain about the fact that it's difficult to "have it all", that it's difficult to work 8-16 hours while at the same time actually caring for a family. Of course, the political leadership at the time was well aware of this, which is primarily while female jobs were made available back then, they weren't meant to coincide with the males. It wasn't(and isn't) very logical, but don't tell that to a feminist. Our friend here will call me a sexist. So, what solutions could we undertake? We could have a new pay system in which we're paid for "X number of days" we worked in a week, but a move towards such a system will virtually eliminate pay rates, overtime, etc. In short, any opportunity to move up would be limited strictly to the corporate ladder. If Males/females are going to work, they have to work at least at different times and to allow for healthy interaction between both parents. Scientifically, less couples spend time together than they did in the previous 30 years. But the most interesting dynamic is the Mother-Daughter dynamic.. A dynamic that gets rarely discussed and is at the core of the flaws of Feminism. http://www.redbookmag.com/kids-family/advice/i-dont-like-my-child I also have the anecdotal experience of my grandmother telling me of the split between her and her mother, who wanted her to marry for a career, and so forth.(We can get to how feminists treat men like trash later). But the greatest irony of feminism, is that it destroys these young girls, every day. The greatest social pressure they face isn't from TV/Media, it's not from some pre-teen male. It's not even from teachers or other known "authority figures". A feminist is a parent who quite frankly SUCKS at parenting. Because everything(and anything) to a Feminist is career oriented. There was a recent poll showing that 80% of men wanted to be fathers(damning to the Feminists I'm sure, and their abusive family courts). What about women? How many women want to be mothers? http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/08/millennials-want-children-but-theyre-not-planning-on-them/?_r=0 http://www.yourtango.com/201087202/women-without-kids-80-percent-30-years-ago And of course, I needn't point out the social re-engineering of the young boys in the country(why, it's even almost a crime to use the word 'boys', lest you be targeted as a potential pedophile). No, they're "kids" now. And for all intents and purposes, "kids" means a female that's not a female. http://www.vision.org/visionmedia/article.aspx?id=466 All of this, which can essentially be boiled down to the destruction of civilization is at the advent of Feminism. Men, women and children are sacrificed by this heartless dogma that consumes everything in the name of selfish profits for those women who have no philosophical or spiritual vision for anything outside of a few bucks. This is seen in the dating sphere, and even I myself as a man will say it: There's a tremendous difference between a feminist and a female. One can possibly a long-term partner, the other is an obstacle meant to be overcome. http://www.rooshv.com/do-not-have-sex-with-feminists That's it, period. End of story. Feminists are very undesirable, unless I wanted to put my children in a very difficult and uncompromising position. They make terrible mothers and even more terrible partners. There's more risk in dating a feminist, then there is in dating a woman. So my fellow men: Discern, ask questions and when you find a feminist. Run away, run far away. The divorce, the costs, the loss of rights and dignity is far too great.
The kind of guys post these anti women threads, if they didnt know to stay the hell away from me id be sure to let them know.
Once again we have a feminist who, 'doesn't like men,' conflating women with feminists when not all women are feminists, and not all feminists are women. Feminism is bad for everyone but feminists, just as Nazism was bad for everyone but Nazis.
. Your brand of feminism would eliminate the anti-feminism of virtually ALL men, myself included. Your brand of feminism, unfortunately, is all too rare, thus the them and us division which defines the debate. ,
Feminist to me means, among other things, and those other things are 'rape culture' 'patriarchy' the 'wage gap' 'men are the only perpetrators of domestic violence and women are the only victims of domestic violence' 'men can't be raped'......
...or much of anything In a video showing the sexual assault of men protecting a church by feminists hundreds if not thousands of feminists in the crowd didn't do anything to stop the assault. In fact, most of the feminists in the crowd appeared to cheer the women on. Talk about rape culture
Is it now your claim that a man and a woman have to meet exactly the same physical standards in the armed forces?
I love that feminist movement...especially when I am walking behind it. Some movements however, or more feminine than others.
In my experience, her "Form of Feminism" is the norm, and aggressive feminism is the rarity. Actually, what she describes seems to me a description of what a strong and capable woman would simply project naturally (and generally do), simply by being herself. I have met One(1) woman who had the extreme feminist criteria, yet thousands who stood up for themselves....I even married one.
An "aggressive" feminist, to me, is one looking to be more equal than I am, AA for example is a basic plank of political feminism, therefore it is arguably THE norm....you've been lucky. The "good" feminist seeks only equality....I think she's a rare bird indeed. .
Yeah well, the Jewish / CIA 911 plot is also arguable. Some even think it makes sense. Could you tell us what are the "planks of political feminism"? - - - Updated - - - No, and good to hear you aint a fundie. i just wondered as your argument style is the same.
Could you tell us what are the "planks of political feminism"? Sure, AA is one. If someone wants equal rights for their daughters AND sons, they are vile, filth-throwing women-hating scum...if they want equal responsibilities as well, they're really bad. You may use different words, but you deny AA (extra rights for women) is a cornerstone of today's feminism? I bet it would be hard to name a single Democrat who would dare question the orthodoxy e.g. When the repubs tried it, it was a "War on Women". Without AA, there wouldn't be any need for feminists.
Well, I am not a feminist-whiner, but this is so funny, let me answer your questions too. It took away my country from me. Every country is only as good as the curves of the girls in it. Now that feminism makes every girl want to be fat like a hippo, I have lost my life to hippos. My bull(*)(*)(*)(*) works less on them when I want to talk them into sleeping with me. Why can't women go back to stupid again? Now I have to think before I speak. I don't like that. Prevents me from undercutting the offers of my competitors, because now that women achieved workplace domination with their well coordinated women's-wages politics, they undercut everyone and put everyone out of business/sweatshop. Yes. Girls want men who know how to be in charge and in control, every girl agrees that the game of the guy who speaks in a microphone is much better, than some average joe from the street. No, but it makes for an excellent troll, that if successful then inspires girls to reply in anger or disgust, which entertains us guys. Apart from this, a lot of anti-feminist arguments have truth in their core, because girls' expectations from men are different from guys' expectations from girls. Politically denigrading either of these expectations at the expence of the other is unfair enough for a good theatre. Popcorn?
The deomocratic party has a party platform, planks and so forth. You can look it up. Stormfront probably does. I dont care to look that up. Now, look up some official feminist platform that has,you know, planks, and give us a citation svp. There are some people, feminists, self styled or real, among them, who favour AA. There are men, women who dont think they are feminists, as well as asians, blacks, service vets, hispanics, disabled etc who do favour AA. i dont. There is no black party platform, no asian party platform, nobody who represents all hispanics and disabled etc, and sure as hell nobody who calls herself feminist who represents all women, or all feminists. Your choice of extreme emotion laden rhetoric suggests you do not have a balanced approach to understanding what you are talking about. Maybe this isnt your rel issue?
. It wouldn't take any really outrageous suppositions to blame feminism for the death of at least one young woman. Some years ago (10-ish?) a student found herself bar-hopping alone in Manhattan at 4AM....the bouncer loads her into his van and leaves her dead. Im supposing she was learning from the ilk of Wendy Murphy (feminist lawyer/prof) who says she has the right to do naked handstands on the street and not get molested, true, of course, but doesn't add that she shouldn't actually do it. That would infringe on her rights. This woman could have been empowered into an early grave. .
I'm referencing AA in the context of feminism, which is the thread. (There IS a black party platform set by the Black Political Caucus(?), along with every other sub-group in politics (except men, of course). Do I really have to quote the part of the Democratic Party platform which says it stands for AA for women (and others)? It's a given. You can analyse my adjectives if you wish, but I actually picked them up (not literally) from right here in this thread. Don't you think Nazi analogies are mutually demeaning? .
nazi analogy..? goes back to look for it. oh.. stormfront is nazi i guess. I wasnt making an analopgy, but yes, playng godwim isnt good form. the kind of hyperventilated language you were using isnt really that great either. just coz someone else i guess used them doesnt improve it. i dont think there is a feminist platform, but sure, some so- styled do want AA. I kind of wish nobody would claim to represent a group that they dont really speak for. and im not for anyone getting unfair repression or favours.
Are you a female or a male/lesbian feminist? If you are male/lesbian, then girls don't seem to mind the hippo shape that much.