Michael Brown Shot 6 Times - All From the Front

it's completely relevant and it shows that you're wrong

evidence does get released during police investigations, despite your denials of reality

 

prove it

Not a single piece of evidence has been released in this case.

A preliminary autopsy report is not evidence..........its public record.

 

Facts are sticky and important things. Just how important can not be known at this time. I'm thinking that it just might be since it may speak to the principals behavior, intent and actions.

When its warranted. Not 24x7x365.

When warranted. They are not one dimensional.

Nor do they have tunnel vision.

 

the video is evidence, despite your denials of reality

what are you going to say when the chief medical examiner, mary case, releases toxically reports?

let me guess, you'll say it's a public record, the investigation is over or some other ridiculous excuse for being wrong again

 

Why should he have tazed him if he was surrendering and had his arms up in the air? You taze people who are not cooperating with an arrest. If Brown was surrendering and on his knees with his back to Wilson why should he have been tazed?

 

You clearly implied it by stating the violence was not justified by simple jaywalking.

You are contradictory and circular and willfully ignoring any evidence refuting you but you have been doing that for years on every thread.

 

Actually they are there to fight crime............not give out gold stars for acting civil.

They are rather one dimensional ....................

And contrary to popular belief, they are not there to "protect" you

- - - Updated - - -

It is not, despite your denials of reality.

It is "evidence" of a closed case.

The fact that it relates to another is irrelevant.....................this all boils down to "be careful what you ask for"

They all wanted to see the proof, got it, and it just upset them more.

 

what are you going to say when the chief medical examiner, mary case, releases toxically reports?

let me guess, you'll say it's a public record, the investigation is over or some other fatuous excuse for being wrong again

no i didn't, stop being so ridiculous

are you saying you've read every thread i've commented on, for years?

 

Yes you did clearly imply that. Stop lying about it.

 

to think anyone would suggest shooting someone for jaywalking, is delusional

are you saying you've read every thread i've commented on, for years?

 

You implied it and that is fact not delusion so why DID you imply it?

 

The medical examiner is not the police.

And your strawman is noted

 

They are there to fight crime and they are not there to "protect" you, but that does not make them one-dimensional.

My point was that Brown KNEW he committed strong armed robbery and the LEO didn't.

 

You are under the assumption that all police officers carry Tasers. You're wrong there. Ferguson Police cruisers don't even have video cameras yet. Now it's coming out that Wilson had been aware that a robbery at the Liquor and Market, was broadcasted. That's why he backed up. Up to twelve witnesses now claim that Brown was in the act of "Bum Rushing" officer Wilson. Your justification to lynch Officer Wilson continues to lose it's reality as each day of rioting goes on. Especially the people that are rioting are New Black Panther's imported from Chicago, Oakland, New York

 

you might want to review the definition of fact and stop being so ridiculous

according to a tweet from a true-crime writer

just like i said, fatuous excuses

 

he's not trying.... he's suggesting to let thugs and hoodlums and anyone who doesn't want to get arrested to just be let go.

 

I bet that changes.

 

absolutely.... reactionary measures always occur in bureaucracies....

 

get a grip on reality, i said brown could be arrested later

 

unless he doesn't want to be arrested then either....


how long do you keep giving a person a choice whether he gets arrested for a crime he's a suspect in. I'm sure the next convenience store clerk that gets strongarmed a week later, sure appreciates that you gave Brown the choice last week, whether or not he has to get arrested.....

 

Would like to take issue with " this all boils down to "be careful what you ask for" " "They all wanted to see the proof, got it, and it just upset them more " OK correct me if I am wrong , After the giant boy was shot by officer Wilson, People wanted the police to release the incident report on the shooting. SO , the Chief releases a video of an unrelated incident(by your own words)(excuse me, you called it a closed case)........ When asked why he released this video( The justice dept advised against releasing the video as it would only add fuel to the situation) he said it was what people had ask for. NOW Up until this point , no one was aware of the alleged robbery so why would they ask for the video. They were asking for the incident report of a killing ,not a robbery they were unaware of. To me the chief was using a play of words(thats a nice way of saying"mislead") to avoid the real issue.

 

swat teams don't usually give suspects any options

what do you meany by, "keep giving a person a choice"? it's a one-time thing

get the swat team together and go get him at home, problem solved, no riots and suspect in custody

 

Spare me. Remove all thought processes and shoot someone in the head is not part of the training.

There are different levels of aggression including whether someone has a weapon or not. Should the cops now start shooting people based on a perception of verbal aggression of any kind ?

Really now.

 

Unless you have some evidence to the contrary, the ME is not the police department.

And the reports are public record........despite your wishes

 

After being shot 4 times, the "assailant" was not attacking the officer. You get a grip.

You are trying to equivocate all threat claiming any perceived threat is justification for shooting someone in the head.

This is nonsense.

- - - Updated - - -

Got it .. thx.