Here Kitty Kitty Kitty!! Hey LOOK.....that shadow looks like the silhouette of Charlton Hestons head!!! Damn you!!! Damn you all to HELL!!!!! AboveAlpha
It would be even funnier if the cat was a supermarket cart? Still slogging away I see, Scott? Keep it up mate - they'll really feel stupid when the cat eventually gets outta the bag. I'll bet the charlatans can't believe how easy it is, and are starting to believe that 'You can fool most of the people all of the time'?
The charlatans had the upper hand before the arrival of the internet. Now that the info is available, it's a question of time before enough people see it that the government will have to admit it. Maybe it will happen in the next twenty or thirty years when all the people who were involved are gone.
Especially when they aren't even real anomalies. My favorite hoax claims revolve around the behavior of shadows and sunlight in the various Apollo photos. There you see people who really have no idea what they're talking about make asses of themselves. Cosmored's obsession with the video clips isn't quite as comical, although he and others ignore all the video that easily demonstrates the reality of the landings. One of my favorites is when the Apollo 15 crew are digging a trench to photograph and collect samples from. You can see the really fine regolith the guy is scooping fly a long way along a perfect arc as dictated by physics in a vacuum. There and everywhere else there is NO billowing and no other effect of atmosphere on the regolith when it is disturbed. Always it flies straight from whatever moves it and falls right back to the surface. This is also apparent when they have the rover kicking it up, and of course in more spectacular fashion, although the trench digging is impressive for the great horizontal distance the stuff travels, and it really shows how fine it is when it hits the surface again. Clip: [video=youtube;sk5GiF_mX5w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk5GiF_mX5w[/video]
I've never seen Hollywood get it right, that's for sure. Incidentally, I found that there are whole Apollo EVA videos up on YouTube now as well. I'm going to do some viewing when I find the time
Everything in that clip is consistent with heavy large-grained sand moving in earth gravity in atmosphere. The footage is being shown in slow-motion which explains the speed of the soil. It's all explained here. MoonFaker: Project Sandbox. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl2S8w-ucmc There are some anomalies that are very clear such as the flag waving without being touched. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/362999-air-caused-flag-move-so-obviously-studio.html Initial Apollo 15 Flag Movement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW9qcL4LiUg This has never been disproved.
It has NEVER been proven,scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c In fact your youboob video takes an awful lot of liberties,and makes a lot of assumptions
Yes it has all been disproven. There are no anomolies. No images exist of the flag moving without human action on the flag or staff. Nothing in these films is consistent with sand in a normal earth gravity environment
This conspiracy theory is older than the moon landing itself. I personally couldn't care less. In my world US went there...And that's about it. If it was a hoax I'd be happy as I don't see any point at all to go to the moon.. Why the (*)(*)(*)(*) would you want to do that? Not very rational as I percieve it. Just stupid and unnecessary.
The proof that they didn't go is crushing... http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/347662-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio.html ...and most of the posters here who say they went have been discredited although they won't recogize it. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=2&p=1064028979#post1064028979 Have you looked at the proof?
An absurd claim easily disproven by clear footprints being made - we also see fine regolith being kicked very long distances.
Maybe the Studios were in fact faked on the moon!!!! Hollywood sign does not even exist, its a prop on the moon. All Hollywood execs are reptilian Moon beings.
If the footprints are in fine sand, we don't see them being made. If we see them being made, they're not in fine sand. Can you show us an expample of a finely detailed footprint that we can see being made? MoonFaker: Project Sandbox. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl2S8w-ucmc (6:15 time mark) I've never seen anything that slow-motion wouldn't explain. Let's not forget that Betamax has already destroyed his credibility by maintaining that the Chinese spacewalk was real... http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=2&p=1064028979#post1064028979 ...and agreeing with Jay Windey's* lame analysis of the dust-free sand issue... http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=403884&page=2&p=1064900819#post1064900819 ...and doctoring a video to mislead the viewers. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=12&p=1065076608#post1065076608 * http://www.clavius.org/about.html
Not only spam, but he carefully records it at his basketball forum and thinks it will be deleted because he is being censored rather than spamming.
Just like the Apollo 15 video, all through this one we see prints being made. You only have to do a comparison between start and end video to see this. Once more you spam the same video as though that paragon of stupidity Jarrah White, is making a point of significance. Your lack of understanding or visually challenged attitude is not an excuse for missing obvious fine regolith being kicked along the surface. Everyone else sees it. Spam. Using a moronic conspiracy theory as a loaded test by a fool can be discarded. His analysis is not lame, you aren't qualified, he is. You are the most dishonest of people - you cite geologists who to a man will tell you that the missions could not have been hoaxed based just on the lunar samples, yet you ignore their testimony in favor of some random internet websites. Sites that offer the most useless claims and ignore major components of the samples that prove their origin. Prove it you joke of a truther.
You're being deliberately obtuse. None of the footprints we see being made have this kind of detail. http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2009/top10_moon/apollo_14_tracks.jpg The ones we see being made look like they're in beach sand; there's no detail. If you know of some footage in which we can see a footprint being made that has the detail that the footprints in the above photo have, could you please link to it?
The prints being made in this video don't have that kind of detail. Apollo 15 flag waving https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HzwSzVQ8gI I've never seen any with any detail in any other videos either. If you know of some Apollo footage that shows prints with the detail that is consistent with fine lunar dust that we see being made, could you please link to it?
Yes they do you simply deny any evidence which proves you wrong. You then repeatedly refer to other videos which show no evidence of your claims
If this is true, you should be able to link to some footage that actually shows that. I can't find any. Start watching here at the 3:47 time mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNm1LVJTJ2k I've never seen any footage that shows much more than this. No detail can be seen in the footprints. All of that footage and other footage I've seen of footprints being made and soil being kicked up is consistent with the astronsuts' moving around in heavy large-grained sand with no fine powder in it in earth gravity in atmosphere.