Commercial flight avoids collision with a UFO over Lake Ontario Two crew members were injured when the plane traveling towards Toronto had to dodge a mysterious object in mid-air. Experts concluded that the object that nearly collided with the airplane was a spherical-shaped UFO with a diameter of around three meters. It definitely wasnt a bird. It was a fairly large object Pilots had mere seconds to spot the object and react in order to avoid catastrophe. A Porter Airlines plane with 54 passengers on board was flying 3,000 meters above Lake Ontario, the smallest of the five Great Lakes of North America when something crossed its path. In order to avoid a mid-air collision with the UFO, pilots had to perform evasive maneuvers. The pilots noticed the object in the distance. As they approached they saw that it did not move and stood in their flight path, said a spokesman for the regional airline. At first, judging by the shape, they thought it was a balloon, then speculated that it might be a drone. However, due to the altitude, the plane was traveling researchers believe its difficult to think it was a drone. The reaction of the pilots before the imminent collision was to perform an evasive maneuver that caused two stewards who were not in their seats to be injured; however, they were able to recover and continue their respective tasks. None of the passengers on board was injured, and the plane landed normally. More here: http://www.ancient-code.com/canada-commercial-flight-avoids-collision-ufo-lake-ontario/ --------- I know people who used to park at the lake at night and watch for UFOs. Apparently, they have seen many! This is a remarkable event!! I wonder, would the "Object" have stayed in place and cause a collision? Or might they have sped away in the last nano-second?
sounds like a balloon unless those are some really small aliens. 3 meters = a little less than 10 feet
As far ad I am concerned there has never been any physical evidence that what are called UFO,s arecactually craft. Thatbuscwhy I like to call them UFL's.... Unidentified Flying Lights . Back in 1970 's a girl who I started dating that night and I saw a UFL. We watched it for a while and the pattern it flew and the speed thatbit look of at when I turned on my headlights matched exactly how people have described such phenomnimon in MUFON, and late night talk shows likecArt Bell. We never told anyone about it because the two of us were not supposed to have been together since we were both dating other people up until about that night. But the aliens knew what we were up to. Seriously I believe thatvare flying lights or flying plasma of flying energy blobs but until you show the crashed evidense you ain't got no proof bud.
Since they can not identify what it was and it appeared to be flying, then by definition it was an unidentified flying object, wasn't it?
Yes, you could say that. Object that caused near-collision with Porter plane not a drone The Transportation Safety Board says it has now closed its investigation into the incident, saying that the object doesnt appear to have been a drone. The description and size of the object does not match any known commercial or consumer available unmanned aerial vehicle, TSB spokeswoman Karine Eyamie said Wednesday. The incident will remain identified as a near collision with an unidentified airborne object. The TSB noted that the incident occurred too far from shore and too high for the object to be a drone. http://www.citynews.ca/2016/11/23/object-caused-near-collision-porter-plane-not-drone/ -------------
No, it's a perfect analogy. The pilot had seconds to react. I doubt the first thing that came into his mind was "let me take a selfy."
Terrible anology as there are more people on planes. All accidents are common. This is an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evixence
In order to catch it on even video you have to have your phone out recording already looking at the general direction of said UFO. How many people record video on a plane? That wasn't my point. My point is when you see an accident take place it happens so fast and you're so surprised that you didn't think to take a picture. You have to anticipate the accident in order to get ready to take a photo. However there are other ways of confirming that at least something happen. If the plane had to divert rapidly then it would've been picked up by radar. Another thing to consider is the credibility of the witnesses. I'm not saying that they for sure saw an extraterrestrial (or what I call demonic) object but to say "pics or it didn't happen" is very absurd and ignorant.