A very simple and easy to understand explanation of why climate change is REAL.

Excuse me, in post 428 I said this:

 

Sorry but ...we are done. Youve had all day to post the valid data but flailed and insulted instead. Have a nice day. warm out!

 

A very simple and easy to understand explanation of why climate change is REAL. Real to who?

 

Toodleoo, have fun with your opinion of yourself.

 

And oh yeah, you've had all day to honestly try to make sense.

 

So you want calibration records for HUNDREDS of sensors around the world and those of highly sensitive satellites and you think that reasonable?

 

wow...bazinga! Not sure how to defend myself against such a perfectly planned and executed burn. ouch. How you came up with that is amazing. All day to make sense! ouch....yep no comeback for that. you got me good!

 

Well yeah, you didn't have good enough communication skills, or maybe were hiding some ulterior motive. I dunno.

 

sorry the ship sailed 12hrs was more than enough time to post actual data. Pretty sure I made that clear. Im trying to conserve electricity but you guys keep wanting to waste it posting.

 

bazinga! ouch...thars two times you got me. Didnt even see them coming.

 

What, data for ppm CO2? ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_mm_mlo.txt

 

lol..ohh its in ppm? Thank god....arrrgh units....

 

Troll post of the first order

 

Aussies for a start

https://theconversation.com/are-hea...ubled-in-australia-in-the-last-50-years-79337

 

Then I'd say we were pretty stupid to wait over 80 years to begin serious data acquisition. Wouldn't you?

Nothing. Which is the whole damn point.

I don't care a straw for that. What I care about is that twice now you've tried to pass off data from 1960 as a product of ARGO.

 

I posted peer reviewed documentation with the calibration procedure and results. The names are on page one.

 

Hold on. The claim was that ARGO shows that the oceans are cooling. I posted a link from the ARGO website that specifically shows that their own dataset shows warming PLUS it shows data from various other datasets with ranges of time extending beyond that of ARGO's own data which shows that the ocean has been warming for decades. That is what their website says. I then posted a very thorough document that enumerates all of the ocean data that is currently being collected, how it's collected, how many stations there are, and the accuracy of the instrument payloads are for each cast. This document also discusses how the ARGO dataset confirms that non-ARGO datasets match the ARGO-dataset thus validating them by another line of evidence.

In a nutshell. The oceans just like the atmosphere have been warming for decades. If you disagree with this claim then present evidence to support your position. Note, that I've pointed you to at least a dozen datasets already that support the claim that the oceans are warming. I am asking you to find me one that shows a long term secular steady state or cooling trend since 1960.

 

Depends on what you mean by “serious.” The warming trend calculated by Callendar wasn’t modern by any means, but it was an impressive mathematical accomplishment without computers. It was still the first half of the 20th century then, and data was still available going back to the late 19th century. It was more “serious” than any climate conspiracy blog.

 

For those that care to read them:

Here is Callendar's famous 1938 paper. http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/~ed/callendar_1938.pdf
Here is Arrehnius' famous 1896 paper. http://www.rsc.org/images/Arrhenius1896_tcm18-173546.pdf

 

are a calibration and a calibration procedure the same to intetnet scientists? If your data is solid you should have no trouble providing it.

 

You got kinda' a point there. Cause, when I buy a thermometer, I want one built by Isaac Newton and calibrated to the Newton Scale. Where14 is the greatest heat of a bath which one can endure for some time when the hand is dipped in and is kept in constant movement, and, 40 is melting point of an alloy of one part lead, four parts tin and five parts bismuth. I'll know then the thermometer can survive re-entry into, that's why.

 

Im not surprised by this based on your demonstration of what you think is good data.

 

You never did answer if you thought NASA was a credible agency.

:EDIT:

Yeah, they must really blow: https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/27/us/nasa-mars-insight/index.html

 

Hmm, I thought I explained it in detail rather well even for internet laymen. If we were still discussing the topic I would go over it again but you lost that aspect when you decided to insult.

 

C'mon grandpa, you're starting to get boring.