Russian aligarch calls Mueller's bluff, will see him in court, catches him totally off guard.

And only about winning in the very short term.

Long term ramnifications mean nothing to Trumpsters. Their collective attentions span is only about one news cycle long. They can't even keep up with the basic facts of the Trump Russia case, and they certainly have no sense of history, government, respect for the rule of law, the stability of our institutions, or our standing in the world, all of which have been threatened by the vulgar, corrupt, little schmuck they worship.

 

Bengazi = 4 years, 0 indictments & convictions
Clinton Emails = 2 years, 0 indictments & convictions
Trump/Russia seditious conspiracy/conspiring with a foreign adversary & undermining the 2016 election = 1 year to date, 19 indictments including multiple guilty pleas to date

 

Lol, you literally can't make this **** up.

People charged with a crime show up in an American court and libs see it as aggressive litigation and an effort to hide the truth.

It's disturbing how badly TDS has affected the brains of the vulnerable segment of the country.

 

Meuller never should have started his focus on Trump. He should have focused on any specific Russian suspects, and only turned any attention to Trump if the evidence pushed him in that direction. Making Trump the center of attention from the start was one of his big mistakes.

 

Sure there isn't. We have the actual evidence from the conspirators themselves, and still you'd not believe that such a well crafted plan could unravel before your very eyes, and yet, it is.

<Mod Edit- Rule 2>

 

No no no your thing isnt that these people are aggressively defeniding themselves. You dont give a flying **** about them. All you care about - what you're creaming your pants over, is that their actions might derail an investigation before it can conclude. Your fist pumping is over the idea that they may prevent us from ever knowing the full unvarnished conclusions of the Mueller investigation.

Which shows that you fear that.

 

You don't understand, it was never about Russia and meddling, it was always about removing Trump, it was no mistake, it was their entire singular objective.

 

I do understand, but it was still a mistake to put the focus on Trump. There was evidence after the election that Russians interfered with the election. There was no evidence Trump was personally involved other than him winning the election, which isn’t really evidence.

 

I am sorry you are so hysterically upset that someone called Mueller's bluff and he turned out to have no clothes, begging the court with his tail between his legs to move the arraignment of his own legal case because he has none.

It's actually quite comical if you think about it

 

BS, there is no evidence at all to support this idiotic, childish and utterly ridiculous notion.


All you really have is a couple of e-mails from a couple of Federal workers who didn't like Trump. That's it.

There is no evidence of any "well crafted plan".

And your feeble attempt to call me a facist doesn't hold water either.

But that's the kind of behavior that Trumpsters are reduced to, since they can't make a case with facts, and they certainly can't refute the fact that Trump is the king of the sewer, and works hard to stay there.

 

Mueller's record is less than stellar, in fact, it's criminal.

You say that as you cheer court decisions whic allow criminal illegals and refugee terrorists into our country.

 

I doubt they actually fear the truth at all, for they don't believe trump needed russian help to win. And there is no evidence that says russia actually determined the election, or that trump colluded with putin. They are just tired of what appears to be to them a witch hunt to take down an elected president. And of course you cannot understand their position, so you have to pull the fear card from the deck.

If trump had colluded with putin, intel would have busted him out with a leak, long ago. That is what you guys do not understand. Intel has nothing to give Mueller apparently. And so he needs to dig do deeply into the past, with trump and his business dealings, in hopes for finding something he can say trump did, even if it is not related in any way to collusion. Obvious what Mueller is doing, and he is on a legal witch hunt. Not legal in our regular justice system but when it comes to politics...everything is thrown on the table. Even if our regular justice system cannot operate in that manner. Trump is guilty until proven not guilty in this special little politically driven system of SC. MSM has been trying for a year to find him guilty.

 

Perhaps you should read your own writing. I worried on your behalf. Seemingly, you just figured that out.. LOL

 

"But as a facist, I can understand..."

LOL

 

The poster I was actually speaking to, who is a self proclaimed facist, and has said so repeatedly on this forum, knows what I am talking about.

Try and make a fact based argument for a change.

Failing that, call a right wing talk radio show. Their audience loves your kind of trash talk. You'll be in your deplorable element!

 

"I am sure you didn't mean to characterize yourself as a fascist."

Sorry. I didn't mean to step on your toes.

 

Sweet name calling. That's the depth. Thanks for demonstrating it, once again.

 

They better be careful. Convicting innocent people is Mueller's history and specialty.

 

"There is no evidence of any "well crafted plan"."

They're doing the best they can.

 

Once again, I was addressing a poster who has repeatedly self identified as a facist. Calling someone a facist, after he publicly proclaims himself to be one is not name calling.

But your reading comprehensions issues are noted.

 

Trumpsters crowed the the indictments were meaningless because the defendants would never stand trial.

Now, out of the other side of your collective mouths, you are celbrating the opposite, that thier lawyers are staging a stunt to try and embarrass the prosecution.

You don't get to have it both ways. They are either going to face trial, or they aren't.

I'm pretty sure that they won't, and that we won't hear from them again after this.

Rosenstein did not go out of his way to say "no one colluded". He did say that he had no evidence that Americans involved in circumstances involving this indictment knew that they were dealing with Russian nationals. That is an entirely different thing, altogether.

 

Not just Trumpsters, Mueller and Co were also sure the defendants would never stand trial, they were in fact banking on it by filing those meaningless indictments.

It's its extremely amusing to see by Mueller's panicked reaction and pleas for continuance that we were right, the indictments were indeed bogus, he has no case and is terrified to go to the arraignment.

 

Mueller hasn't been accused of any crime, let alone convicted. More pro-Trump, anti-American BS.

Pray tell, which court decisions "whic allow criminal illegals and refugee terrorists into our country" have I cheered? Go on, find any post where I have done so.

 

You mean the judges? They are simply stating the obvious. It is based on Muellers activities, not the secrets in his mind.

 

This is hilarious, did you read what you wrote before you posted it? Trump hasn't been accused of a crime, let alone convicted, yet you (libs in general) already have him convicted and are calling for impeachment. And as you (libs in general) root for a sitting president to be impeached YOU are calling me anti-American.

And while I mentioned your (libs in general) cheering for the illegal and refugee decisions allowing them to come here, perhaps YOU can show me where you decried those decisions as anti-American.