Just because it would not sit well does not mean it happened. There is simply no evidence that anyone but Oswald did it and the evidence against him is overwhelming. Whether or not it is easier or harder to accept is irrelevant in light of the evidence. Oswald did not have any known mobsters in his family. Even the term mobster is a flexible and ambiguous word which can mean many things which is to say anyone can claim or be accused of having a mobster as a relative so it is irrelevant if he even did have such an uncle. Oswald simply WAS an outspoken advocate of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee which fits in perfectly with his background of a long time advocate and acolyte of marxism. Many people celebrated kennedy's death as he was not a universally popular president so even if Hoffa said that it was irrelevant and millions probably expressed the same basic feeling. Ruby was only rumored to have ties to the mafia and the EXPERTS who work for the FBI and spent their lives studying and bringing the mafia to justice agree he never was associated with the mafia in any meaningful way. Which is to say he may have met some mafia types like many common businessmen would have. However his so called ties to the mafia turned out to be rumors which trace back to Ruby himself. It is not unusual at all for people to claim mob or mafia ties to make themselves sound more important or powerful than they. Either way it makes no sense to have the mafia use Oswald or Ruby to kill Kennedy. There is simply no way to have people commit such acts in such public fashion, despite what is seen in the godfather films which is complete fiction. Especially since Ruby spent years before his death maintaining that he acted alone and no evidence disputes that fact.
I don't know which ALPHABET AGENCY everyone posting under your I.D. shillS for ,but I hope they pay you all well ! Do they call it the MINISTRY OF TRUTH !
In other words you hate it when inconvenient facts ruin your argument and must therefore resort to fairy tales to divert from those facts.
FACTS ?Anyone who has half assed followed this since it's happened knows the official story in all it's facets has been blown completely out of the water and public opinion completely substantiates that FACT ! So keep blowing your smoke you're not convincing anyone !
That is not a fact little one. The official story has not been blown out of the water. To do so requires evidence which you willfully ignore because you prefer fairy tales to the truth. Public opinion substantiates nothing whatsoever regardless of the subject. Truth is not decided by consensus. The evidence proves you wrong and that is a fact you cannot refute.
Absolute fact not bullshit. The EVIDENCE proves you wrong and you cannot refute or challenge it. You should try reading these threads and see how all of the conspiracy claims have been crushingly debunked by evidence and facts.
actually it was mostly a CIA operation.The mob was involved but they did not have the power to pull off an operation like this.they did not have the power to set oswald up like he was or change the parade route or make the media fall asleep as they did or lower the protection.they just did not have that kind of power.the CIA on the other hand did. Even CIA operative E Howard Hunt confessed that on his deathbed you must be aware?
yeah some people want to so desperately convince people the lies of the warren commission are correct they talk to themselves all the time since nobody will listen to them as is his case/
Oh he gets paid MAJOR big bucks from his boss that pays him.He would not come back for the arse beatings he suffers here everyday if he was NOT being paid major big time bucks for the arse beatings he suffers from people like you.lol
Anyone claiming there are paid government shills is the one who has been defeated so you admit it and concede defeat. it is you who has been beaten
The mob was involved in the actual dirty work of assassinating the president. Everything else, the planning, the coverup, etc. was the department of the FBI/CIA and other government forces. This was much too big for the Mafia alone to pull off.
I am not wrong you are. There is no evidence to support your fiction and you have failed to post any evidence.
YOU NEED ANOTHER CATEGORY LHO WAS NOT A SHOOTER PERIOD. HE WAS A PATSY JUST LIKE HE SAID !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wrong. He was not just a shooter he was the only shooter there as the evidence proves. He was no patsy he was merely denying his guilt as most felons do.
You need another option in your poll. There is no actual evidence at all that Oswald shot anyone. https://jfkplayersandwitnesses.word...k-shooter-in-the-alleged-oswald-snipers-nest/
Very wrong. There is a mountain of evidence that Oswald shot Kennedy. We have his rifle with his prints, we have expended shells fired from his rifle and with his print. We have the bag he used to smuggle the rifle in. We have expert autopsy evidence from experienced professionals proving the shots came from above and behind. We have Oswald as the only TSBD employee to flee and not return. We have massive evidence that Oswald **** officer Tippit in an effort to evade capture. We have the only bullets recovered from the scene which came from Oswald's rifle. We have the damage to the limo and it;s windshield which could only have come from above and behind. We also have the vast majority of witnesses who support all of the evidence that Oswald shot Kennedy. The Overwhelming majority of witnesses heard 3 and only 3 shots and they heard them coming from Oswald's position. All of this is more than enough to sink and convict anyone in court. On the other hand there is no evidence at all of another shooter.
Everything I have said is factual and documented and it has not been debunked. The facts I have stated do however destroy and debunk your fictional claims. You can reject facts and evidence all day long but they do prove you wrong. The farce is he conspiracy theory you cling to like a religion. There is massive evidence which I have cited which proves Oswald shot Kennedy and it is only some of the evidence. You have no evidence of another shooter. You know this is true.
The famous head shot as captured by the Abraham Zapruder film is empirical prove positive of multiple shooters shooting from a variety of locations but I'm not about to waste my time going down your rabbit holes. Rational people know what Kennedy's head rocking back at moment of impact and a gaping exit hole in the back of his skull means. Whether you accept the proof or not is immaterial.
It is not empirical. In fact it is not even evidence of multiple shooters. The head rocking back has been conclusively proven to be irrelevant and easily caused by neurological response and the jet effect. The head wound was not an exit wound period. The autopsy which was performed by experienced experts proves that fact. You are not educated on such matters to challenge an expert and experienced pathologist and no such expert pathologist has challenged their findings. Sorry you are proven wrong by fact and evidence Unlike you I do accept evidence and do not ignore the evidence which I do not like. This is what you mean by rabbit holes. You have watched a few videos and done no real research and refuse to look at reality. Take the red pill the matrix has you and you are brainwashed.
I won't risk the wrath of prejudiced mods by giving you the response such nonsense deserves. Enjoy your elaborate dream world.