The atheist gods of 'Lack', the only true religion?

Doesn't seem to follow from anything in that clip.

 

Well, only the unique brand of logic that you've come up with.

Nope, not clear.

Verb:
"a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action (bring, read, walk, run, learn), an occurrence (happen, become), or a state of being (be, exist, stand)" (source)
"a word used to describe an action, state, or occurrence, and forming the main part of the predicate of a sentence, such as hear, become, happen." (source)
"A verb describes what a person or thing does or what happens. For example, verbs describe: an action – run, hit, travel, an event – rain, occur, a situation – be, seem, have, a change – become, grow, develop" (source)

I guess we finally solved it, the problem was you getting your grammar from a children's show.

 

Both myself and others went down that road with you before and exhaustively and futilely laid all the logic on the table for you and I wont get wrapped up in your circle jerk quagmire again. you do not understand logic and refuse to get formal education, and you claim that a verb does no identify and action just because the format is switched from subject to object.

 

I posted that as an aid for neoatheists who needed the attributes of a verb reduced to the maximum possible reduction, your cite destroys your claim not supports it and you fail to see that and experience has proven there is no way in hell anyone will be able to explain it to you when things get to the point of your being obtuse.

 

wow once again another discussion that has degenerated to the bottom of lame **** hole. The best way to avoid looking foolish is to avoid defending the ridiculous

 

furthermore your I believe quagmire has nothing to do with how much lack, which is the subject of this discussion, you totally dodged the crystal clear logic for lack to run this off course by switching it up back to your futile believe quagmire.

 

It would seem that NO ONE here understands your logic, so lets just evaluate this situation:

10 people are on one side of something and provide explanation as to why

1 person is on the opposite side and cannot provide explanation the ten understand as to why.

Which side would you pick to join?

 

10 socks, not people.
Right, 'no one here' (that is neo atheists) understands formal logic, its not mine, I did not invent anymore than I invented math.

Smith a legacy atheist did understand formal logic, and no one here understood 'his' logic either, we both engaged neo atheists in a futile attempt to prove arguments using logic, obtuse denial trumps all logic.

What others are or are not capable of understanding is not my problem. I bring forth useful information which is completely useless for anyone or group of ones operating in a coma of denial. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivium

 

No just having fun with the idiotic " prove god doesn't exist " crowd. You know, the same crowd that can't prove unicorns don't exist but doesn't understand the analogy with god.

 

So, first of all here, you have never used formal logic, and I think we both know you don't even know what that means anymore than you knew what a context free grammar was.

On top of it all, Swensson has engaged with you, and addressed every rambling thought you ever threw at him. He has done it thoughtfully and in detail. He has done so invariably with patience and politeness, and took everything you said as seriously as anyone possibly could. He has not ignored anything you said, and quite frankly has the patience of a saint. And in response you continually throw a fit, insults, and ignore the things he says.

Literally nobody agrees with you... anywhere. You haven't even presented a logical statement. Any logic that is ever presented to you, you completely ignore. And start to yell (completely without any basis or evidence) that YOU are the one using logic.

Swensson has seemingly bottomless patience, and I have to say I admire him quite a bit for that. However, most of us are just humans, and will eventually just call you out for being an idiot. When every human, the way things work, and your own logic completely defies the things you are trying to argue, then it is not EVERYthing else in the world that is wrong, it is your premise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

 

Really? So you admit that you cant prove God doesnt exist, and you claim God does not exist without proof, fine with me, of course that play falls under the definition of hypocrite.

FALSE ACCUSATION stemming from butt hurt

FALSE ACCUSATION stemming from butt hurt

FALSE stemming from butt hurt, he responded with strawmen just like you, small world eh.

TRUE his strawmen were well articulated.

Yes most trollling is done with the utmost politeness articulate too

People that troll rarely ignore the opportunity to advance frivolous strawman arguments

FALSE ACCUSATION AGAIN stemming from butt hurt and being proven wrong

FALSE ACCUSATION anyone reading you false accusations are laughing their asses off right now.

FALSE ACCUSATION stemming from butt hurt, quote this alleged logic if its true

FALSE ACCUSATION stemming from butt hurt and being proven wrong

FALSE ACCUSATION stemming from butt hurt and being proven wrong
I am NOT the one who claims a verb does not describe an action, then post the definition proving it does in fact describe an action! DUH!
Verb:
"a word (part of speech) that in syntax conveys an action (bring, read, walk, run, learn), an occurrence (happen, become), or a state of being (be, exist, stand)" (source)

FALSE ACCUSATION stemming from butt hurt and being proven wrong
Yes only someone who does not understand logic or grammar would claim a verb signifies an action.
Did you conduct a poll? Everyone else limited to the 10 neoatheist socks on this board sounds more like it.
Yes it does get to a point, when all else fails:

Nah neoatheists dont suffer from cognitive dissonace, its straight up coma denial.
How many times is that you doubled down and got your asses handed to you now? About 12 maybe?

 

Because nothing can be proven to not exist unless it's a tautology. So it's a meaningless bar.

 

I mean... I don't really need to say anythign else honestly.

 

you need to comprehend that neoatheists bragging about their logic and reason only to fold in complete failure to accept only what they can prove to be true is not my problem! Its highly entertaining watching the squirm and pretend words mean what they do not, a great comedy.

 

You dont you and the neo atheist crowd has effectively hung themselves in triplicate, and you dont want say anything since you cant back what you said because it was not true.

 

The squirming is the part where no counter argument exists but ignoring that fact.

 

yeh rocks cant do verbs, so you agree then with swensson LOL

go ahead prove that rocks can disbelieve.

 

Because nothing can be proven to not exist unless it's a tautology. So it's a meaningless bar. but you will never address it, that's the squirming.

 

I dont have to address it, its part of neoatheology, the neo atheists have to prove THEIR [IL] Logic not me.

You dont get it, its not my problem they bought wooden nickels and look so foolish.

You address it!

 

Again take the baton from swensson; prove that rocks can disbelieve.

 

Because nothing can be proven to not exist unless it's a tautology. So it's a meaningless bar. but you will never address it, even though you brought it up. THAT'S the squirming.

 

Again take the baton from swensson; prove that rocks can disbelieve.




take your time!


Looks like you need more time? Sure!

 

Because nothing can be proven to not exist unless it's a tautology. So it's a meaningless bar. but you will never address it, even though you brought it up. THAT'S the squirming.

Now, you can 1) admit that this argument you posted is dumb and meaningless or 2) offer any logical counter argument, THEN maybe we can move on to rocks. OR, you can keep trying to change the subject to rocks which is the same thing as 1).

 

So you have nothing!


Again take the baton from swensson; prove that rocks can disbelieve.




take your time!


Looks like you need more time? Sure!