PROOF that Kavanaugh is innocent!

Look, the dems have had their dog and pony show now it is time to advice and consent. I didn't vote for trump, I voted for the other liar. But he is president and he has the right to appoint who he sees fit and with whom the majority of the senate agree is a qualified candidate.

This is nuts, 35 years after the fact a woman accuses a man who has been in the pubic eye for 20 years of an assault on he committed by a high school kid. She has no collaborating witnesses , not only to the assault but even to the time and place that it occured. My wife was mugged 37 years ago, she can tell you every single detail of that event as for two years she would need to be accompanied anywhere after dark. Her best friend never even noticed a change in demeanor after the supposed event.

I just find it highly unlikely that the event as she describes it took place. Nothing in his adult life has shown that he is "capable" of such an act.

 

Are all men?

 

Of course not.

 

I would bet Ford’s supporters who actually believe her story are in the minority. 30-40%, tops. The majority simply understand that Kavanaugh would be a huge problem for the left’s agenda, so by hook or by crook, he cannot be allowed to get confirmed.

 

After this is all over and Kavanaugh gets confirmed or does not get confirmed, the other side is going to say it was the wrong decision. I have seen nothing yet that convinces me one way or the other. I can see things that Kavanaugh has said which makes me question his story. I look at Ford's background and there are things in there which make me doubt her story. I fail to see how an FBI investigation will prove absolutely that it did or did not happen.

Now that I have got that little detail out of the way, this whole thing is wrong. When someone can accuse someone of something which may or may not have happened forty six years ago and ruin a life, actually many lives, it is wrong and dangerous. No man or person in his right mind would pursue an office when this is very likely to happen.

 

And your personal opinion based on nothing more than a couple of old photographs and your personal political bias supersedes her testimony, of course.

 

Her testimony is based on just her own say so.

 

Even funnier is you thinking that any on the Right think there is a criminal trial standard. All because the left is afraid of that happening.

His suitability was already assessed. With 6 FBI background checks and a WH security clearance check.

 

Kavanaugh's is not?

 

You are confused. I never opined about the thinking of "the right." I merely note that a job application and the assessment of the applicant's suitability is not a criminal matter.

If you are upset that Trump ordered an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh (aka "Bart O'Kavanaugh") based upon recent testimony about him, I can't help you with that.

In your hyper-partisan zeal, you seem oblivious to the likelihood that the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh (aka "Bart O'Kavanaugh") would further alienate women from the GOP, serving the Democratic agenda, and that, were he rejected, it's very probable that an even more conservative judge, Amy Coney Barrett, would be nominated, depriving women of an added incentive to vote Democratic.

 

Yes you did, as you thought the Right thinks there is some criminal trial standard that was going to take place.

I'm not upset that Trump ordered the FBI to do a limited background check on these allegations. Covers his ass. Kavanaugh wasn't going to make the Opening of the Session for SCOTUS anyways.

Yes I used Hyper partisan zeal to counter your hyper partisan zeal. The only difference being. I didn't bring up Trump.

They say those with TDS just can't stop from always bringing up Trump in every issue out there. Due to this I am noticing this much more. Especially with those of the left and their Hyper partisan Alt Left illiberals.

But you shouldn't worry.....your secret is safe with me.

 

Just because you have issues with alcohol and no indication any other individual does.

He's got an exemplary 35 year record that is unquestionable. If you were right, today review would be quite different.

The Trump-haters in the MSM have spent countless resources and time trying to corroborate your theory of thet last 1/3 century and found nothing but glowing praise.

If you were right, the facts would agree with you, and not me.

 

How and why did you twist what I said. Show me right now where I said or even hinted that I have "issues with alcohol". That's an outstanding and blatant lie. Again, it's indicative of just how much bull**** and to what lengths a Trump supporter will go to in order to demolish a non-Trump supporter.

 

Please show where I opined regarding what "the Right" thinks.

Good. Some Republicans were extremely resistant to any attempt to uncover the facts before Senator Flake saved them from their frenzied rush to judgement.

Your desire to avoid evoking Trump is entirely understandable.

Hyper-partisans seem to hate mention of their messiah by the less that worshipful. Americans not mentioning the unpopular POTUS is unrealistic.

Whatever "secrets" you like to fancy you are keeping safe is of no consequence for me.

 

What is your opinion of Keith Ellison and Corey the groper Booker? Are they misogynists?

 

I had no intention of demolishing you.

You seem upset that someone might suggest you had an alcohol problem without proof.

Yet that's what you did with Kavanaugh.

 

If you like your Supreme Court judges to be obfuscating lying partisans who is prepared to lie over the small things, then I guess kavanaugh is the man for you.

Personally, I thought the bar for character and behavior of SCOTUS members was considerably higher than "not a sex abuser".

 

cute glasses, tho. those are so back in style.

 

Kavanaugh has a 35 year career of dignity and superior character.

Paid Liars/Hallucinations don't change anything.

 

No problem.....mums the word.

 

The question is, why did you intentionally do that?

 

They can all resign and live out their lives in shame too.

 

Then he blew it big time during the interview. would you hire a floor sweeper who lies and obfuscates in such a blatant fashion over incidental things?

Devils triangle is a drinking game only to those people who like to lap up other people's bodily fluids.
Boofing is taking drugs by shoving them up yer arse.
Ralphing is puking one's guts out, not merely a reference to a "weak stomach" which couldn't possibly take all that beer he drank.


Nobody cares about a teenager back in the day drinking his face off regularly. The accusations of sexual impropriety are moot 37 years later, but his performance during the committee hearing is entirely relevant.

Seems character isn't all its cracked up to be with republicans when its a republican's character being questioned.

 

But they wont and you dont want them too

This all partisanship with libs and you only want to get Kavanaugh

 

Leave it hedonist libs to knpw all about kinky sex and drugs