Because Obama race agitated there was the necissity for the world's first ever beer summit. Aside from that he deliberately made a Brown Hispanic killing a Black thug in self defense a White versus Black issue when he SHRIEKED at the world, "If I had a son he would look like Trayvon" He agitated Fergusson into violent and bloody rioting and did the same with every issue he could for eight straight years while leftists cheered.
It would be easier to not target children if the Muslims didn't launch their unprovoked rockets from elementary schools and hospitals.
When did Bowers say that he hated Trump? All he said was that he did not vote for Trump. He stated that it was good that Trump was president but wanted Trump to be more right wing ie more extreme right. And he did not murder Jews because "Trump LIKES Jews", he hated Jews before Trump even considered running for President. But he started his murder spree during Trump's presidency - I wonder what made him feel publicly coming out in a blaze of glory. So who is looking for a new meme?
I always liked this bit on the good fellow... “… negotiating with Obama is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, (*)(*)(*)(*)s on the board, then struts around as if he won the game…”
Kinda like when some commie (Mikhail Kalashnikov) was very impressed with the Germans Sturmgewehr-44. FYI: The Sturmgewehr-44 and the AK-47 are assault rifles while the M-16 is not an assault rifle because it's chambered fo0r a high power varmint cartridge. German - STG 44
I am totally pro gun and gun ownership. The facts on the .22 round that the AR-15 uses is the real damage maker here: "It explained that one reason for the AR-15’s killing power is that its bullets were designed not to pass straight through an object but to “tumble” when they hit, destroying flesh along the way and leaving a large exit wound on departure." https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2017/11/the-nature-of-the-ar-15/545414/ The accuracy of the round, the velocity and what the round was designed to accomplish on impact is the real damage maker, just sayin'........and I see no reason to ban them but the combo is deadly to the human body.
Excerpt: Sorry for the confusion...it looks like the paragraph has been edited to death. The original paragragh was "During the 1970s, NATO members signed an agreement to select a second, smaller caliber cartridge to replace the 7.62mm NATO cartridge. Of the cartridges tendered, the 5.56x45mm was successful, but not 55gr M193 load used by the U.S. at that time. The wounds produced by the M193 round were so devastating that many considered it to be inhumane. Instead, the Belgian 62gr SS109 load was chosen for standardization. The SS109 used a heavier bullet with a steel core and had a lower muzzle velocity for better long-range performance, specifically to meet a requirement that the bullet be able to penetrate through one side of a steel helmet at 600 meters. This requirement made the M855 less capable of fragmentation than the M193 and was considered more humane." with a references from "Ian V. Hogg, Military Small Arms of the 20th Century, 1981" and "The Small Arms Review vol.10, no.2 November 2006". However, the word "many" in the third sentence was challanged as a "weasel word". Therefore, I included an additional reference from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) "International Legal Initiatives to Restrict Military Small Arms Ammunition W. Hays Parks∗ Copyright 2010 by W. Hays Parks International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) page 1-18" which listed "Austria, Argentina, Belgium, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cambodia, Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mauritius, Mexico, Romania, Samoa, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, etc." as countries that consider the 55gr M193 round to be inhumane. This refers only to the 55gr M193 round. These same "politically correct" countries consider the 62gr SS109 (M855) round to be more humane and subsequently adopted the 62gr SS109 round. They justify thier choice by claiming that the 62gr SS109 round is less likely to fragment than the 55gr M193 round. ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:5.56×45mm_NATO
I do not care how much you contort logic but just because a person be they a Jew or not disagrees with an Israeli policy that does not make them an anti Semite. Trump just wants to punch his NRA ticket that is why he says what he does. It's the phony in him that always comes out. He tries to garner a Political gain even from a tragedy.
You avoided the question -- I'll ask again: If someone is shooting at you, why do you not want the capacity to shoot back?
The STG was unreliable. You can't honestly say the same about the AK especially the russian ones. And the AK also used an intermediary cartridge, not a full powered one like the AK.
Trump didn't blame the victims. He offered the idea that maybe we should have security in public places. If that offends and deeply saddens this individual, then his values are misplaced. Furthermore, I expected the grandiose whining from the Jewish Community after this incident and well, I'm tired of it. One of the principles behind the Zionist movement was not only the creation of Israel as a nation-State, but the principle of the right of return for the Jewish People. Why have they not returned? And that's not a question just from me, there are Jews in Israel who ponder the question themselves. The need for the Jewish to establish themselves as citizens of other countries is long over after the creation and maintaining of the Jewish State. The right wing Likud party has made strides towards that goal. If the Jewish don't like it here in America, despite our overwhelming AIPAC support, etc then my humble suggestion to them is to follow the origins of their roots and return to their most blessed protected homeland.
I have not read any documentation claiming that the STGR -44 hadvreliability problems but it is well documented that Mickey Kolashnikov copied a whole lot from the STGR -44. Oone item I will agree with you on is that the 44 was a bit underpowered.