Wow do I hate marijuana.

I haven't while driving, but I've noticed it stopped at traffic lights when both cars have open windows.

 

of course. but to tell somebody to “take personal responsibilty” in response to their complaint about impaired drivers is folly. it is at best a non sequitur.

you cannot factually substantiate that argument.

i challenge you to make a post sans ad hominem.

 

no, not at all. you are arguing logical fallacies. simple as that.

now why don’t we let court jester speak for him/herself... oh jesssssterrrrr????

 

While technically in my state it's illegal to do so, I do agree that the best place to learn to drink is in the family home. We taught our boys the advice about not turning your back on a drink.

 

Of course I can, and it would be trivial to do. What causes more accidents weed or speeding (they are almost mutually exclusive)? Weed or fatigue? Weed or texting? If you knew you were going to be involved in an accident the probability is very low that it would be due to marijuana.

 

please cite your data. thank you.

 

Which logical fallacy ?

 

https://www.michiganautolaw.com/blog/2015/12/14/most-dangerous-driving-hazard/

 

we've already been through this. and it's fallacies. plural.

 

So you don't know? Lol.

 

of course i know but i'm not going to repeat myself. go back and re-read the thread. i'm not doing your homework for you.

 

No comment on the data that proves that MJ is the least of your worries on the road?

 

https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/usdot-releases-2016-fatal-traffic-crash-data

According to this there's an almost 40% chance you would be killed by a speeder, texter, or someone drowsy. If you add in drunk driving (can't be sure if the stat includes high drivers) it goes up to 66%. Face it, your rant has no merit other than to demonstrate your petty intolerance.

 

https://www.michiganautolaw.com/blog/2015/12/14/most-dangerous-driving-hazard/

Drunk Driving – Up to 380 times more likely to crash
Texting while driving – 23 times more likely to crash
Drowsy driving – Nearly 5 times as likely to crash
Driving “High” (Under the Influence of Marijuana) – Twice As Likely To Crash

 

Didn't say that. I just don't spend my life obsessing over it.

 

Since you have claimed I approve of drunk driving why don't you give us the post number where I said that. Of of course you could either admit to deliberatly lying or admit to just being so uneducated as to be unable to understand the English language.

So CourtJester has now spoken. Happy now?

 

I had your back... lol

Nutty conversation. Valuing individual freedom (something every American should want,) means you like it when people get killed by a drunk driver. (But I'm the one with logic issues? LMAO)

 

Just in case anyone is really interested here is about the only real info out of Colorado

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068732/

And bear in mind that testing positive for pot in the blood can and does occur long after any impairment.

 

I have to guess you are an old fart LOL most people have smoke pot and they are not losers. I guess I can say people who drink alcohol are all lazy and as interesting as a glazed doughnut. Makes as much sense as your comparison

 

I would much rather my kids smoke a joint than drink booze.

 

The sexism here is disgusting referring to a woman as a bimbo. I guess all the men who drive drunk aren’t bimbos....
Anyone who has smoked pot knows that they don’t speed up a car that’s for drunk drivers. You can usually find a pot smoker because they’re driving about 25 miles an hour because it feels like they’re going 90.

 

True story. I remember. Oh the 80's.... what a crazy time you were.

 

Me to. It does not have to be one or the other.

 

The lady who started the thread opened up with bimbo. What's good for the goose is game for the gander, ma'am.

 

Well, so you recommend pot and you accept as fact all drunks drive over the speed limit. What science is that based on?

When the mind is altered, it is not smart to name either of them as preferred.

And do you believe the inhaled smoke is great for the lungs? Don't give the same con job that the tobacco industry did.