Thoughtless WTC Conclusions

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Mar 2, 2019.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One of my favorite thoughtless conclusions that OCT supporters have made and in many cases continue to perpetuate the myth is the notion that it was even possible for fuel to pour down the elevator shafts much less puddle in the basements at the bottom of the shafts. This thread is prompted because someone recently posted that on this site.



    we can see here that liquid contained inside of aluminum turns to a spray immediately upon impact when the tank is severed.

    So are these thoughtless conclusions or purely propaganda, or something else?
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyone can see most of the fuel went up in a fireball OUTSIDE the towers upon impact:




    Not to mention William Rodriguez's testimony corroborated by other eyewitnesses who claim a huge explosion in the sub-basement PRIOR to any airplane impact and Bobby McIlvan'e coroner report that he was killed by a massive explosion upon entering the lobby.

    https://gumshoenews.com/2016/09/10/...what-really-happened-to-bobby-mcilvaines-son/
     
  3. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How is someone in the basement supposed to know when the plane hit.
    Of course there was an explosion in the lobby.
    The force came out of the elevator shafts.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeh thats usually what happens when explosive devices are planted below the lobby causing explosions to take place in the elevator shaft immediately below the lobby. What else would you expect?
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
    Bob0627 likes this.
  5. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah right
    That's what happens when they are flooded with jet fuel.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh?



    Apparently you dont know that jet fuel is not an explosive material, why dont you look it up and post the burn rate for us then explain how it could remotely in anyones wildest imagination have enough force to blow off elevator doors, blow out 4" thick glass, crack, break up and knock all the marble off the walls and floor.

    I anxiously await hearing how that is conceivably possible!
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  7. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No you don't
    It went down 100 floors with other residue from the building.
    Lots of pressure.
    That will explode

    Or it could have been the gnomes with holograms.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh, so 'it' poured down the elevator shaft under the high pressure of gravity for over 1000 feet so it could blow up in the basement and blow out the elevator in the lobby above. Makes perfect nonsense to me!

    Yes, in fact it would be easier for me to believe it was gnomes with holograms than the story you just spun.

    Singing and dancing is not a good substitute for facts, especially facts which are very easy to find like the burn rate of jet fuel. 'plonk'
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The guy will say anything that he thinks defends the OCT no matter how ridiculous.
     
  10. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so you do get it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeh you agree that I get it and it goes without saying that if I get it you dont. Especially after showing you video demonstrations proving its impossible to get an explosion with your theory.
    and brag about it no less.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
    Bob0627 likes this.
  12. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have quite an imagination.
    How utterly standard,
    You're favorite accusation, and favorite excuse.

    I never read the OCT.

    It interests me the same as yours
    Most of your -- I never read.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well at least you admit you are a twu believer, that you believe the gubmints OCT without any knowledge what you believe in.

    Not surprising that I try to debate you and you have nothing to discuss.

    Since you admit you know nothing about the subject it forces one to question why are you in any of these threads in the first place?
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
  14. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Making stuff up again I see.
    From your posts, it seems you are the one who knows nothing about it.

    and BTW, on most of the stuff posted here,
    you don't have to know the governments position to know you are wrong.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The video proves that no 'pouring' can take place. Therefore corroborating evidence has been posted so either you have some evidence to counter that position or you are off topic.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
    Bob0627 and RiaRaeb like this.
  16. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113

    There is NO EVIDENCE of any "basement explosion" ergo there is no basis for your "thoughtless WTC conclusions".
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Says who?

    Fuel smashing into a wall at 500mph cannot 'pour' anywhere. LOL
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
    Bob0627 likes this.
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That’s false. There is corroborating eyewitness testimony as well as physical evidence (injuries). These are part of the body of evidence filed with the grand jury petition.
     
  19. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have a woman who said.
    It looked like a bomb went off in there.

    I said the same about my kids bedrooms
     
  20. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well if your kids were injured I suggest you take them to the hospital. This thread is about what may have happened or not on 9/11 not about the condition of your kids’ bedrooms.
     
  21. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You made this ridiculous allegation;

    Where is your FACTUAL CREDIBLE EVIDENCE for these imaginary "explosive devices" of yours?
     
  22. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,808
    Likes Received:
    2,351
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They don't have "FACTUAL CREDIBLE EVIDENCE", for anything.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  23. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,694
    Likes Received:
    11,760
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kokomojojo likes this.
  24. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have posters who weren't there contradicting eyewitness claims of hearing, feeling and being injured by explosions in the sub-basement of the WTC.

     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  25. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In other words you have SQUAT!

    :roflol:

    Nitpicking over the couple of seconds between those events is EVIDENCE of DESPERATION because it certainly is NOT evidence of any explosions!

    What makes it all the MORE LUDICROUS is that if there were "explosions" prior to the impacts then there MUST have been a THIRD SET OF SEISMIC DATA that DOES NOT EXIST!

    The data that exists shows two impacts and three collapses and ZERO explosions.

    Why do these imaginary "explosions" NOT appear in the seismic data?
     

Share This Page