Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

Wrong JS. He solidifies my assertions. Mueller's report contains no recommendation for DOJ prosecution, present or future. Mueller'r report contains no recommendation for impeachment. Lying (D)'s and alt-LW media made fools of PF posters who clung to the lies like holy scripture. Trump will win a 2nd term JS, and face no prosecution for any imaginary misconduct (D)'s might concoct in the interim.

 

I fully agree... I think Barr testifying is a filler, until they get Mueller... He wasn't there during the bulk of the investigation so he adds nothing.

I'm not interested in a single thing DisBarr has to say, especially after Mueller called him out for his actions... I might watch a bit today in front of the Senate, but it's not must-watch.

I still think Barr shows to the House tomorrow, regardless of his stance on going.

 

You are dodging JS. Because you refuse to "reply w/quote" I receive no notifications of your non sequitur projections. Mueller made no finding of guilt, hence the default decree of innocence is implicity prescribed by the rule of law. Trump has been exonerated by the DOJ. Mueller cannot refute his own conclusions.

 

Not yet. Would you care if he was?

 

Show me where mueller says it’s up to the AG. Quote it.

 

Or lack of conclusions to recommend any further legal actions against Trump.

 

No he didn't.

 

If presidents can be exonerated by their own AG, we might as well just remove impeachment from the constitution.

 

What actions what did mueller call him out for?

I agree that Barr adds nothing, we know he is simply going to state the law and conclusions, which is not the soap opera the Dems are hoping for because it runs counter to their false narrative

 

They had plenty of open and enthusiastic willingness to collude on the part of the Trump people.

And plenty of reciprocity on behalf of the Russians, which always stopped short. Of course, in stopping short, they thoroughly compromised the Trump campaign, which Trump has spent most of the last two and a half years trying to bellow past and cover up,’

Collusion is not a crime.

Conspiracy is.

 

Because Barr and Trump are trying to prevent Mueller from testifying.

Of course they didn’t tell you that on Fox Noise or in the Trumpischer Boerbachter!

 

How are they doing that? Please do tell

 

We continue to see the extremist rwnjs silliness. Mueller cannot make findings of guilt, thus no findings of innocence can be announced or implied. He can make recommendations. The next Administration will make the decision to prosecute Trump as a civilian. In the meantime the feebs and the staties' other Trump investigations continue.

 

Now how could they stop Mueller from testifying? They can't, short of committing real crimes and getting in real legal and political trouble.

 

Senator Lindsey Graham alleges it is a witch hunt JS. Verbatim: "The House is on a witch hunt, truly a witch hunt to make something out of nothing". https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lindsey-graham-on-barr-hearing-house-is-way-over-the-top (D)'s in the House are tryinh to obstruct Barr's investigation into criminal misconduct and illegal surveillance. Senator Lindsey Graham nees to introduce legislation to protect AG Barr, the same way the Honorable Senator did for SC Mueller.

 

Apparently, we might be all wrong...I am waiting patiently for the information

 

Now you are getting it! He can make recommendations, as all prior specials have done which lead to impeachment. Here mueller found no crimes to recommend.

 

He was exonerated by Bob Mueller. The rule of law dictates that absence a finding of guilt, innocence is the default finding. Mueller didn't even recommend further examination of evidence. No grand jury presentaion, no impeachment hearings. He submitted his report for rubber stamping by Rosenstein, and Barr. He got exactly what he requested ... non accountability.

 

Or.... and I'm just spitballing here.............you could use the tools God gave you and google 'will Mueller testify'

https://www.thedailybeast.com/rober...p-department-of-justice-is-holding-it-up-dems

 

Lol mueller was supposed to impeach him himself? You should really read the constitution lol

 

Rep. Nadler: “Mr. Barr any comments on the Mueller report.”

AG Barr: “Sorry, I can’t comment on matters pending before a grand jury” and gets up and walks out.

 

Is that article literally whining saying Barr hasn’t wanted to come testify today, even though he is? So no date has been set for mueller? How’s that’s trumps fault?

 

Mueller was supposed to issue recommendations for prosecutions on any criminal charge he had evidence to support. At the time of his appointment (D) congress made their expections crystal clear. Barr has the clean version of Vol. 2 on display. Sen. Graham / Collins are the only ones who viewed it. (D)'s know Mueller doesn't even imply more investigation is necessesary. Either Mueller's report contains enough evidence to support impeachment, or it doesn't. The House doesn't need anything from Barr. Barr didn't collect evidence, or interview witnesses. (D)'s have the report, and the special counse who wrote it at their disposal.

 

I'm trying not to lose it with you, but what part of the TITLE of that article confuses you??

Mueller’s Willing to Testify, but Trump DOJ Is Holding It Up

 

You keep on with this BS it's your goto, could he have charged Don Jr or any other family member? Could he had charged anyone else with obstruction? Could he had said there was enough evidence to charge Trump but he couldn't because he's a sitting President. HE COULD HAVE DONE ALL THAT BUT DIDN'T. Sorry pal but your trying to lead people to an inaccurate conclusion because you know you were dead ass wrong