He's rumored to be one of commie John Brennan's buddies....he's a damn spy who committed treason. People like this need to be in Guantanamo.
I see Trumpists still don't understand what the word "treason" means. I'm sorry if the truth is inconvenient for your political beau, but the whistleblower followed the legal process. Stop calling for his execution just because you are offended that the truth is coming to light.
He's a whistleblower - followed all the procedures to report malfeasance. His report was checked out with other witnesses he identified and found to be credible.
That this guy is from the CIA is one of the least surprising things I've heard all day. However one of the most surprising things I've heard is that the New York Times was the one who leaked that.
You know so much about treason 18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. Deep state coup attempts are treason. This POS cited FAKE NEWS articles in his 'whistle blower dossier'. It's a gonna be a long 6 more years for libs.
I appreciate the fact that you can quote the law of the land, now try actually reading it one day. Keep calling for the murder of Trump's political rivals with fake charges of treason, though. At least that's enlightening. Should you one day decide to read the definition you quoted: the whistleblower has not levied war against the US or adhered to anyone who has. How did you even miss the part that you highlighted? That's almost as embarrassing as the lethally authoritarian agenda you are pushing.
Brennan was the director of the CIA and he swallowed the Steele report hook line and sinker... clearly there is so much fog out there being a CIA agent means nothing as far as I'm concerned. This will end in disaster for him... clearly he's not good at making important decisions because this was a particularly bad one.
Why is the New York Times trying to release information that can help identify the identity of the whistleblower?
I'm sorry, but I don't believe much coming from the Times an nothing coming from Dean Baquet. I'm curious as to the real reason, not the reason they are putting out.
Clearly the US is that divided it goes right through the Intelligence Services as it did the FBI. It appears you now have CIA Democrats and CIA Republicans... spying on one another... although this guy did a bit of a crappy job
You know the more you think about it... the establishment is carrying out a coup against the people.... The people elected Trump and the establishment is doing everything they can to undo this vote....same thing is happening in the UK. What an absolute disaster... and dumb thing to do.
oh rubbish.. he's Brennan's buddy and we all know how they tried to frame Trump as a Russian asset... this is simply phase two and it's a very dangerous path the democrats are following. He couldn't even give a first hand account of events... and we all saw the transcript... the Democrats are clearly the only national security threat here.
That's some paranoid stuff there, chief Sure, and he also reports to the alien lizard people You know all this whining about deep states and everybody out to get pee boy borders on delusional paranoia and a fair amount of cowardice.
Actually the EC and Russia elected bankruptcy don. Americans went the other way by 3 million votes Darn facts again
Really... that's it...you're going with "Hillary should have won but now Trump is sitting in the White House"