Trump supporters voted for him after learning that he bragged about grabbing women by the ***** and a dozen women came forward to explicitly allege Trump acted in a sexually inappropriate manner towards them. I have very little faith in Trump supporters to hold Trump accountable. I do have faith in the Democratic house to hold Trump accountable.
Trump just redeployed 1200 soldiers into Saudi Arabia after decided to abandon US allies on a whim, thereby ensuring the slaughter of tens of thousands and the resurgence of ISIS.
Jeez, democrat losers are literally playing the same old Kavanaugh slander playbook without modifications. I bet they expect different results, any day now lol PS i hear Julie Swetnick is on that line into Schitt's office too, waiting for her turn to blow lol
Actually, one of the next individuals to testify, despite being ordered to not testify by Trump, is Sondland. And he is expected to tell Congress that Trump dictated the "there was no quid pro quo" text that he personally sent and to explain that he does not believe that there was a criminal aspect to the quid pro quo requirement that he demanded of Ukraine to launch the investigation if they wanted to meet Trump.
You're behind the curve here, this silly spin has already fallen apart. Sondland called Trump and asked directly if it was quid pro quo and Trump answered that absolutely unquestionably it wasn't. That's it, nothing more, nothing less Be prepared for his testimony to be another nail in the Ukraine hoax coffin.
So the ambassador wasn’t sure if it was a quid pro quo, and since trump didn’t immediately confess then that proves there wasn’t? Lmao
And who are “people like me”? If you believe asking how “many people will it take to be arrested that surround trump before it becomes legitimate” then you might have TDS.
People like you don't understand that it will never be legitimate because all you folks are really doing is still having the longest cry in history. Hillary lost, get over it...
Why would i have to get over Hillary losing when I didn’t vote for her? You know your point is pathetic when you have to resort to lazy ad hominem remarks. Still not answering the question. Let us know when you find your integrity
Good question actually... by itself it doesn't prove Trump's innocence but it certainly doesn't help the witchhunters who have the burden of proof. It still goes against them, it's one nail of many in the Ukraine hoax's coffin, not THE nail. If they can't prove that Trump tied aid to investigation of the Bidens (note, tying aid to investigation of corruption is perfectly legit and they can't even prove that ), it's game over for dems... again.... just like Russia hoax.
Oh, did you waste your vote on Jill? Either way, you whine about Trump like a Hillary supporter, so you tossed away your vote and ended up in the same boat. Sad. I told you, your 'question' isn't legitimate to begin with. Someone with integrity would have noticed that, but alas, I'm dealing with you...
This is good news. We can't have these sort of people in government. Maybe impeaching Trump will be a deterrent.
What if they can prove it was tied to a WH visit? Even if not, they still have the election violations and abuse of power. But a QPQ is a much stronger case. this is all assuming Rudy and his criminal buddies don’t end up revealing all sorts of other stuff. Like who the Russian businessman is that was funding Rudy’s pals in their bribery schems.
"Fiona Hill, the White House’s former top Russia adviser, told impeachment investigators on Monday that Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, ran a shadow foreign policy in Ukraine that circumvented U.S. officials and career diplomats in order to personally benefit President Trump, according to people familiar with her testimony." https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trumps-former-top-russia-adviser-to-testify-in-house-impeachment-probe/2019/10/14/e6015c1c-ee34-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html
Prosecutors routinely destroy proffered defenses as part of proving the prosecution. And here, the defensive talking point used after the text messages was released, "See, Sondland agreed that there was no quid pro quo." The Prosecution now gets to say, "That witness is now telling you that his text message was a statement dictated by the Defendant."
Dude, you guys don't even have Republican Senators willing to go on record to say that it is perfectly legit to ask a foreign government to investigate your domestic political rival.
Discussing the corruption and unpresidential actions that surround trump is not “whining” and just because you deem a relevant question to be illegitimate holds as much weight as the the people calling trumps presidency illegitimate. Like I said, let us know when you find your integrity.
Lol, in your previous post you were salivating about Sondland's upcoming testimony, now that i brought you back to earth you're keeping your fingers crossed that a good prosecutor might have a chance to minimize its damage and prevent it from completely destroying the entire case. Lol PS the word "dictated" is a lame dishonest leftist spin, Sondland never used it and never will. His testimony will be, "i asked point blank and Trump answered, absolutely no qpq"
With Devin Nunes and Bob Goodlatte running the show?? Fat fricking chance... The clock began on January 3rd, 2019, and yes, it's taken too damn long as it is...
A president's envoy can not run a shadow foreign policy, president's policy is THE foreign policy, regardless of who runs it. Duh, read the Constitution for Christ's sake...
I agree... Sondland is not the story here. He's not in trouble and he cannot really damage Trump. He'll confirm Trump gave him the No QPQ line and that might be it for him... Oh... except he's likely to confirm there was QPQ SNIP Sondland is set to tell lawmakers that he did understand the administration was offering Zelenskiy a White House visit in exchange for a public statement committing to investigations Trump wanted ENDSNIP
Man, you are on fire today!! Totally correct... The President's policy, the ONLY foreign policy in play, was to extort Ukraine to benefit his campaign... He just left all the people who normally implement that policy out of the loop. Clear as day!!
They are not stupid enough to bother with "when did you stop beating your wife" kind of questions. The absolutely primitive and lame efforts by dems to entrap them are actually quite amusing.