Just a heads up to let anyone interested know that MSNBC's Rachel Madow will be interviewing Giuliani associate, Lev Parnas, at 6 PM PST / 9 PM EST.
Yes, I'm watching it now... pretty compelling stuff from one of the people in the mid-level circle.... much tighter than Sondland, the previous record holder.. Your thread will probably be closed soonest, so this thread might be a good place to talk about what we are hearing tonite http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-than-one-quid-pro-quo-for-biden-dirt.566883/
Wow this is gonna be a big story tomorrow I’m guessing. Republicans will say he’s lying, but he’s obviously got receipts lol
So, we are supposed believe what the corrupt and indicted Parnas has to say???? LMFAO! When did you left-wingers start believing what corrupt and indicted crooks have to say?????
I know that no mater what, Republicans in the Senate will vote "no", but I would still like to hear from all these people
trying to rig an election by bribing a foreign government to announce a bogus investigation for starters but also not turning over documents and preventing witnesses from testifying in a impeachment hearing "Lindsey Graham: A president who doesn't comply with Congressional requests for information is subject to impeachment." https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/1181682899424350209 you don't want to see the docs or witnesses Trump is hiding?
We don't know that there's a bribe.(Actually, what we do know is the Ukrainian President/PM have both said there was no pressure or discussion of the aid.) We do know that there was this desire for an announcement of the investigation. You'd be better off dropping the 'bribe' angle, and going for simple public corruption by using outside influences to damage a political opponent. That would be truthful. Then the question becomes: Is it something to remove him on? I don't think so. I think if Pelosi had chosen censure, she would've gotten the whole House to approve. The Senate might also sign on, and it moves the threat of an impeachment ever closer and far more realistically. But I get it: Realism and pragmatism is slow, and that doesn't work for #ORANGEMANBAD. It's a shame that vengeance is the mode of our present politics.
Not a crime. And Holder refused to show up until the GOP used the courts. The Dims didn't use the courts. Why?