Zelensky called on NATO to carry out preventive (Nuclear) strikes against Russia

Preventative strikes as in preemptive nuclear strikes. Our favorite cross-dressing cocaine-addict elensky would like to start WW3/End the World. elensky called for nuclear strikes by NATO (the US) on Russia during a speech (given by video) at the Lowy Institute in Australia.

It's time to kick this sack of to the curb.

https://lenta-ru.translate.goog/new..._sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

In his opinion, NATO should exclude the use of nuclear weapons by Russia. “Preemptive strikes so they know what will happen to them if they apply. And not vice versa - to wait for Russia's nuclear strikes, in order to say later: "Oh, you are so, well, keep it from us! Reconsider the use of its pressure. This is what NATO should do: reconsider the order of use," Zelensky said.

 

~ Kim Kong is getting lonely up there in North Korea. Maybe he will shoot a rocket at both of them ... ?

 

Russian troops in headlong retreat on two fronts....the silence of the Putinistas.

Zelensky says something on a video call to a private group in Australia....New thread time!

Every thread ignoring the important stuff just makes it funnier.

 

Statements by the president of Ukraine about preventive nuclear strikes are not important? What a BS!

 

This is a big deal if true which I suspect it is. People should realise that Zelensky is not the goody two shoes that is being promoted by the west

 

How many nukes does he have?

BS indeed.

 

That isn't what he said though, and they clarified after the fact; https://www.news.com.au/world/europ...e/news-story/80b4cd30b1ac06298d995ce96950d744

Also, are you saying that a leader raising the prospect of using nuclear weapons in relation to the war in Ukraine would be unconditionally wrong?

 

Are you ignorant or pretend to be one? Of course, he has no nukes that is why he calls for NATO to use the nukes first. Otherwise, he would not bother with statements but just used the weapons.

 

And? He has command authority over zero nukes. Tighten that sphincter...

 

No, I'm very well informed. Far better than you.

How many bullets, shells or missiles has NATO fired for Ukraine in this war? Not one. Yet we are supposed to take seriously the idea that they will launch a first strike because Zelensky says something in a zoom call?

Now you really would have to be ignorant to believe anything remotely like that.

 

Of course he's going to suggest that. He's scared for his people. The threat of Putin using tactical nukes right now is at its highest since he's running out of any conventional option.

Don't forget who agressed on whom.

 

The fact that NATO has not fired any missiles in Ukraine so far does not exclude the option that in this particular case NATO will follow the suggestion of Zelensky. Sorry, but neither you nor anyone else in the forum can predict the future actions of NATO. Your knowledge even if it is much more than mine does not mean in this case anything.
As for Zelenski, only insane person can suggest to use nukes preventevely. It is even less reasonable that Ukranian army is not in a bad state now.

 

Is Zelensky supposed to be content with waiting on Putin to drop a nuke on Kyiv first?

 

More Russian false equivalency active measures that the American right also traffics in on the forum daily. Putin shot himself in the foot by underestimating the Ukrainian heart and the West's will. He's going to have to "find out".

 

So NATO is going to start WW3 with a pre-emptive strike on Russia because Zelensky wants it to? Do you listen to yourself? Clearly you have spent too long immersed in the demented world of Russian propaganda if you think such a thing even possible.

I realize that the growing awareness that everything you have been told is a lie must be disorienting, but please stop projecting onto the rest of us. Maybe get back to focussing on what is actually happening - tens of thousands of your fellow Russians dying in an unecessary war started by your country. Maybe focus more on the actual threats made by Russia to use nuclear weapons because it is losing a war it started. Those are the ONLY nuclear threats at the moment. Pretending otherwise is....desperate.

 

Zalenskyy has not said anything about a pre-emotive nuclear strike against the Evil Russian Empire. Challenge to you find such a quote and make it is not from Russian propaganda or Russia’s friends such as Fov ‘News’.

 

Clearly is one thing- that you can not predict what steps NATO will take. You are not a prophet. Russia is currently conducting military actions outside of Russian territory. So it does not loose the war. Had Ukranian army been near Moscow, I would agree with you. Otherwise-no.

 

He said something in a zoom meeting with an Australian organization a day or two ago that could be interpreted that way. It has sent the Putinistas into a frenzy, whish is hilarious given they support a guy who actually has those weapons and has actually made that threat.

 

You aren't even making sense any more. Clearly the disorientation is worse than I thought.

Maybe a few weeks basic training in the Russian army would clear your mind. I believe there are spots open for patriotic Russians who love their country.

 

Nobody except Biden loving fools believe that “important stuff”

According to that “important stuff” the Ukrainians are always dominating the Russians, destroying an armored division, killing generals, Russian soldiers defecting en masse, 700,000 Russians leave in 2 weeks to avoid the draft, etc.

If all that’s true then Ukraine should have occupies Moscow by now.

You are being played, stop being gullible..

 

So, we have people on both sides of the war crying for Nukes. Bravo for pointing that out.

 

You don’t even read the OP. But you’re posts do identify you as a Bidenista blindly repeating what your master tells you.

 

Ok thanks I need to find that just out of curiosity. I will be talking to my Ukrainian cousins this weekend so I should ask then what they think.

 

So you are accusing BiG of acting like Trumpiestas! LOL

 

NATO has fired weapons in "the ukraine". NATO has special operators on the ground. NATO has supplied the weapons and NATO is supplying the satellite data/coordinates used to fire these weapons. Furthermore, these rounds of nuclear rhetoric was started by the U.K. then Putin responded in kind.

The politicians in the West will say and do anything if they think they can profit from the M.I.C.