All 9 Supreme Court justices push back on oversight

Oh, it couldn't possibly have anything to to with indications of bribery, quid pro quos and other financial indiscretions?

 

This is racist and shameful.

 

It's true and honest.

 

I'm always amazed when people on the far left believe they are entitled to say racist things because of their politics. They would likely defend a liberal judge from racist attacks. But, if someone is only not racist to people they agree with, they're still racist.

 

That's a comment on his actions, not his race.

 

You effectively called him an Uncle Tom. That's racist. End of story. Be better.

 

Not effectively, explicitly.

And it's not racist.

Look it up.

 

Yes, it is racist for a black man to disparagingly be referred to as an Uncle Tom.
Did you call him an Uncle Clarence?

 

No, it's not, and yes, I did.

You guys need to look it up. It has a specific meaning.

 

You've just tainted every position you've ever had and will have on this forum.

 

No, you need to look it up.
There are literally hundreds of reputable sources that say calling a black man an Uncle Tom is racist.
Calling a black man an Uncle Tom denotes he's a race-traitor. Specifically, a black American man betraying his own race. That's RACIST.

 

When one calls a black person an Uncle Tom, what they are really calling them is a SLAVE, someone who betrays their own race. That's RACIST.

 

Like I give a wet **** for your opinion?

 

Sure. I looked it up for you. It's racist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Tom#Epithet

 

No, it's not racist just because it has to do with a race. The point isn't that he's black, the point is he's acting against his own and other people like him's best interest.

 

A derogatory term used to attack someone based on their race is racist. It's an ethnic slur. You know it's an ethnic slur. You know you used it to attack a black man you dislike. It's racist. End of story. Be better.

 

Where does it say "racist"? It talks about politics and subservience but not race.

You've just made my point for me.

 

So does the SCOTUS. So I take it you oppose the SCOTUS dictating to the Congress what should be theirs and then the ability to call them before them to answer to them?

 

Not just my opinion. Every person who reads your racist posts will now perceive your posts differently.

 

Calling someone a traitor to their race because they disagree with your politics is racist. I'm sorry if you need it written in crayon to understand it.

 

The Senate Judiciary Committee only asked Chief Roberts to talk, either by written response or in person. Chief Roberts declined the in person response directly.

 

That's why there are more than one.

 

So when RBG, or Feinstein, didn't resign when she should have, why don't you call them Uncle Toms? They did betray their social allegiance.

Yes, it has specific meanings and both are tied to blacks. The term is racist.

 

Why don't they invite the Liberal justices to talk? Surely they're more than willing.

 

Seriously?
The only people in such high and responsible places who resist oversight and shun transparency are the corrupt ones, regardless of ideology.