Biden tries to grope Eva Longoria

Is it simply not possible for you to post in this thread without trying to go against people and insult those that have a different opinion than you?

Try being a gentleman and not insulting the ladies simply for disagreeing with you.

Do you remember Tara Reid? How about biden's daughter's journal about showering?
How about the little girl whose nipple he pinched that came out and said that he did pinch her nipple?

 

What's three and a half feet tall and could bring down the President of the United States?

Whoops, maybe I shouldn't tell that one.

 

He does not grab for them. She is pulling back from the hug and his hands, which were squarely on her back, moves as she retreats and grabs his hands because they were not moving. . You get more of a "feel" from your friendly TSA agent.

 

Because you can only imagine how many times you've wished you were.

 

You do know the rest of us can see the video right?

 

And here my friends, is a perfect example of gaslighting.

 

Oh, that one is certainly the poster boy for championing women! And I'm Trix, the rabbit, IRL Laughs.

 

What do you want to say FatBack? I saw the video. You want to see groping, I see a bump faux pa. Nothing you have said on this thread convinces me to see it the way you guys desperately want it to be.

 

I never saw that thread. I don't know why I should have to explain to you, that there are a ton of threads, on this forum. I doubt if many people, see them all. Have you seen the thread on scientists creating synthetic model embryos? I didn't notice your posting anything in that thread (and my impression is that you rarely stay completely silent, if you are reading a thread). Maybe we just are drawn to different topics. A lot of the thread titles, on their faces, strike me as being ludicrous propaganda, and so I don't generally bother to look at those silly things.

I guess I also need point out to you, if there had been a recent thread about Biden pinching a girl's nipple, there are some keywords, in that, which should make the thread rather easy to search. If you would like to pick out specific posts, from that thread, to better make your case, I will give you that opportunity. If not, I will do the search myself, for you. But be advised, if I go through that trouble, on my own, and assess the thread to be bogus, I will at that point be done with that contention of yours; IOW, I am not going to do the legwork for you, and then indulge your wanting to start pointing to posts, or whatnot. So it's up to you: you can present the argument from that thread, or I can check it out on my own. But not both.



P.S.-- What about Tara Reid? I am not at all into celebrity gossip. I know that she had the reputation of being a "slut," that is, of having sex with a lot of guys. I always liked her energy, and thought she was pretty. Are you saying that she has her own Biden story?

 

You're not aware of the Tara Reid allegations? I like how you try to pass on rumors to slander her.
But to be honest with you she's not much of a looker anymore.

https://www.newsweek.com/biden-accuser-tara-reade-will-not-silenced-would-testify-under-oath-1764401

 

Hey libs, look at the video again. Longoria had to back up because Biden did not. Body language is a terrible thing for Biden.

 

But... Something something... Trump trump...

It's a slowed down deep fake video by The deep state.... Trump trump..

 

If Biden groped Longoria, then Trump groped Ivanka. Do you agree?

 

You can't possibly think that article is proof of anything.

1) You'd claimed that Joe Biden had admitted this-- do you not realize, that would be your most damning evidence? Then why don't you include it? This is what makes me refer to arguments as bogus. If you are going to claim that Biden said something, and interpret it in your own words, you had better be able to supply a link, or you needn't bother to make the claim, at all.

2) This article says that the pinch was captured on video; and that it is "cached" on Google-- but it doesn't supply the smoking gun evidence????? Does that make sense, to you? So I don't know what part of this is a lie, but if someone is claiming there's a video which is available online, but not providing at least a link to that video, I am calling bullshit on the basis that, at the very least, the writer of the article must be stupid beyond the conventional range of what that word is used to signify. Hence, that person's assurances of things, are suspect, as he clearly lacks something crucial, in the area of rational thought.

 

Are you suggesting that I have said, that a woman's accusation is all that is required for conviction, for any particular offense? If so, you must have me confused with someone else. Having a tendency to believe a woman's charge of rape, is not the same as saying that there are no false rape charges. Secondly, though you give no details about what has been "accused" of Biden, I'm betting that it is not rape or attempted rape. So, is your argument strong enough, to actually clarify it, explain the details, & cite sources? Or are you just going to stick with the ambiguities?

 

I did not say that Joe Biden admitted it..... I said the girl admitted that he pinched her nipple... Sometime after the fact

Since you got that wrong, right off the bat I did not even bother to read the rest of your post.... Just so you know.

 

Maybe she should change her name to Eva Longina, like one of those Austin Powers movies.

 

Really, Rita, your new nature is not doing much for your listening skills, or politeness. I had started my P.S., about Reid, by saying "I am not at all into celebrity gossip." Does this not imply to you, that my paying little attention to it, could well mean that I give it little credence? If not, my choice of the word "gossip," should have been a clue.

I immediately follow that sentence, with "I know that she had the reputation of being a 'slut,' that is, of having sex with a lot of guys." This, it should be clear, is merely my sharing with you, the extent of my familiarity with gossip on that celebrity. Note, I did not say, I know she was a slut. I said that I knew she had that reputation. Are you claiming that is not true?

To cut to the chase, I do not like your false allegations, that I was passing on rumors, for the purpose of "slandering her." Why would I even want to do that? I had added that I had always liked her energy-- read: despite the rumors, which I did not allow to have any influence over my opinion. And I clearly said that I had no idea of whatever you were alluding to, regarding Ms. Reid. So, again, there is absolutely no reason to think that I would be trying to slander her, in fact, only reasons to think the exact opposite. So please try to act more like a lady, in your speech.


I wanted to express that right away, before I have checked out your link, so I will have to get back to you, after I've read it.

 

You claim that you were not passing on rumors to slander her but that's exactly what you were doing. You basically said the rumors called her a ho right? You sure enough said that the rumors were that she was very promiscuous. Did you have a source for that?

Since you're so worried about making that clear how about we clear up that little misconception of yours where you claim that I said that Biden admitted pinching that little girl's nipple, when I said no such thing at any point in time.

Are you going to go back and read and realize that you were wrong and maybe even admit it?
Probably not but I'm open to surprises.

So you're aware of all of these rumors about her but you're not aware of her allegations against President Joe Biden sexually assaulting her? You can see where I might find that a little bit hard to swallow

 

Seems to me like someone is spoon fed the news from very biased sources.

 

I remember reading about it frequently here and it was in the news. As a matter of fact I think it might have even been a subject in the debates.

Didn't Kamala say that she believed all women?.... until of course she became the VP nominee.... At which point she only decided to believe some women.

 

I'll even go ahead and post the link to kamala's statements about the subject....
Just in case selective memory is still a thing.


https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/437107-harris-i-believe-biden-accusers/

 

Just so you know, the reason I "got that wrong," is because of how ineptly you had expressed yourself-- FYI, which is not my fault.
Here is your incredibly poorly worded paragraph:

Another fact is we have a little girl who we can see Biden pinching her nipple on tape having came out some years later and saying that yes he did indeed do that.


That is not a clearly written sentence, FYI. I would contend that my reading it as Biden being the one who "came out some years later ...saying that yes he did indeed do that," is the more reasonable assumption, than that you are referring to the little girl; it would seem a given, to me, that had the girl not spoken about it, neither would anyone else be. So that seems a superfluous point, but one which you appeared to be presenting as a big deal. At any rate, even if a case could be made for your referring to the little girl, there is no way that any reader could know this, from your problematic, and grammatically incorrect construction. The clear way to express that idea, would have been:

The little girl, whose nipple, Biden had pinched, years later came out to make the accusation against Biden.


So, if you are not only going to not take responsibility for your ambiguous phrasings, but are going to blame me, for guessing incorrectly, and so have the rudeness to not even bother to read my post, as a punishment for your own poor writing, I will have to consider if I wish to continue the conversation.

While I could understand your skipping the part, in which I'd misunderstood your meaning, my post had been conveniently divided into a clearly marked #1, which was the part with the confusion, and a #2. There is no rationale, other than as a slap in my face insult, to think that my #2 was not worthy of being read, because of a completely reasonable mistake-- for which the writer of the confusing explanation (you), is ultimately most at fault. Since what was written in #2 was relevant to our continuation of the discussion, I am at a loss as to what you expect me, now to do-- am I supposed to repost that part, just to get you to read it?

When you changed genders, did you also shave off 40 years of age?

 

So it's my fault that you didn't read more carefully? It's not my fault that you didn't read it carefully. The meaning of my post is clear, despite your attempting the muddle the topic. Me thinks you doth protest too much.

Can you ever just admit to being mistaken?

Are you one of the ones now who's also going to engage in petty little insults instead of actually discuss the topic?

Remember I'm much more sensitive now after my transition so you should be a little bit more mindful of my feelings

 

This was a statement of fact, on my part-- to be clear, the fact was that this was a widely known reputation. I never said that I accepted it as true; but anyone claiming she did not have this reputation, must be utterly clueless on the subject (because, as I'd said, someone like myself, who pays no mind to such things, could not help but be exposed to the idea, as it was that ubiquitous).

As your trying to make it out that my stating a well-promoted reputation (for the sake of giving you the extent of my awareness, regarding gossip about Reid's personal life-- since you seemed incredulous, that I didn't already know the story about her, to which you'd alluded), was my attempt to slander someone; this can only be taken by me, as your own disingenuous attempt to slander me.

So, goodnight.


P.S.-- I did not read any more of your post, beyond this slander, naturally.