It's no longer a conspiracy theory....

Yes, there is no point in whipping out a dictionary when you don't even know what the discussion is about. Some people believe in conspiracies about 9/11 having been an inside job.

 

Yes, and the government 9/11 report is by definition a conpiracy theory.

So please stop using the term a a pejorative.

 

Just out of curiosity, are trailer parks including basements now?

 

And who specifically do you think was behind the attack?

 

@StillBlue - I don't know, what's the word on the street around the burning barrel?

 

Maybe you should stop equating conspiracy with conspiracy theory.

Was the terror attack on 9/11 a conspiracy against the US? Yes, its an actual conspiracy and not a conspiracy theory

Claiming it was an inside job is a conspiracy theory

 

That's not what I said. I said the official government report on 9/11 was a report theorizing about a conspiracy.

Now then, do you place full faith in the government's official 9/11 theory?

If so, you are a conpiracy theorist.

 

There is no "official theory" when the attack was witnessed by millions of people. Its factual. Those 4 planes were actually hijacked and used in the attacks.

But you are free to believe anything you want of course.

 

No, there really is an official report, commissioned by congress, which describes what the government thinks likely happened- you know a a theory...

https://9-11commission.gov/report/

...about a conspiracy.

 

Who specifically do the conspiracy theorists believe attacked the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon?

 

Suffice it to say that any thing that has you and I on the same side of the issue and opposed to it must be so completely beyond the bounds of probability as to border on the impossible,

 

Bullshit. Researched by whom? Are you trying to tell me that I don't know what I saw? The shaking of my building and rattling of the conference room window were certainly real.

I know I took a lot of acid back in the 60s, but geez!

 

Relax, I was just kidding.

 

TNT wasn't used madam. Thermite/thermate was used, and modern nuclear fission devices.

 

Independent and critical thinkers are a distinct minority in the US of A circa 2020

The herd follows the lead of the MSM. Ignorance and submission is bliss.

 

It's a safe bet that anybody citing Wikipedia buys into every official narrative ever told by the government.

I have a close friend who is a professional welder. He does not use thermate or thermite.

No matter that trivial BS, there were visual and chemical evidence that thermate (the version with sulfur) were present at WTC. I would expect a Wikipedia fan to be ignorant or in denial of that fact.

 

What I'm saying is that like so many other official narratives, it has moved from conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact. If one judges by facts and evidence available, it is no longer a theory that the official narrative regarding 911 is false, it is a fact.

 

Oh there are, your hunch is right. Newer/better ones are, for example, that the clot shots are safe and effective, that Putin invaded Ukraine for no reason at all.

 

With all do respect sir I trust the Alphabet soup media about as far as I can throw a battleship. I have seen zero evidence to support the notion of controlled demolition and the finding of trace amounts of supposed thermate particles in the remains is as far from evidence as you can get for reasons I've already detailed.

 

To begin to answer your own questions, have a look in the mirror.

 

It's a complex answer, but to make it simple for the sake of discussion, Israel is a good starting point.

 

That's quite a vague answer. Not that I'm at all surprised. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

With all due respect to you sir, and it is considerable, the only reason you have seen zero evidence is because you have not looked with an open and curious mind.

Because I have long respected you, take several hours or days to view the work of Jeff Prager, now years old. The USGeological Service may be the only honest federal agency to have been involved in testing and recovering of evidence at WTC. Next week we can discuss it.

911/PRAGER, Jeff • Avalon Library Click on "Amerika Nuked". It is extremely detailed, rather like a college course on nuclear matters, fission and fusion. He provides detailed links to USGS data from that day.

 

Vague? Surely you jest. My guess is that it's too damn specific for your liking, you don't like the answer.

Christopher Bollyn, married to an Israeli woman, has the best detailed investigation and analyses of the events of the day.

Christopher Bollyn He's published at least two books, and he is a true journalist. Not long after getting started, he was assaulted by local police while at his home in Illinois, many years ago. It's a miracle he's still alive, considering what he's written.