Larry Sinclair Tells Tucker Carlson All About His Sexual Relationship with Barack Obama

Untrue.

Unfortunately, it is irrelevant to the issue.

Funny, but expecting that your perception of someone else’s words should override, in defiance of their actual meaning, is well …… funny.

 

How about telling someone that he will be dating an 8 year old girl in 10 years time?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...wqsBegQIDBAF&usg=AOvVaw2VsrzNwd2TTRhFQlpIk_i4

Or telling two 14 year old girls that he will be dating them in 2 years time?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...IQFnoECA4QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0z8vQdBi0RCLUBLPbQ6Vyf

Just to expand a bit further, wanting to date someone is not just wanting to take them out for dinner. "Dating" is a code word

 

I think you really need to clarify what you mean by "telling someone". Who is this someone? The 8 year-old-girl, the future suiter, or a third person?

Who is telling them? Same question as above.

I have a feeling that you are making a huge mistake here and the fact that you present it as a fact itself smells of a gross lack of both experience and wisdom.

 

Perhaps you should read the links I provided?

 

I'm not interested enough to do that because you haven't submitted a clue to its contents. If you want to have a dialogue with me then you'll have to reply to my questions. I'm not a robot.

 

You clearly aren't familiar with many black athletes...

 

But he is definitely familiar with Ms. Obama, her stature, and her questionable gender. Plus he has an excellent sense of humour.

 

Yeah... from like 90 years ago.... So, can you now admit that his entire curation and history is a sham?

 

Democrats don't have a good record on this. Even now, democrats are pushing "trans" because it "cures" being gay. Literally.

 

Lol I gave you the links and what they contained in my post you quoted!

 

No he belongs in jail like the other over 1000 of them.

 

LOL! You think being called gay is insulting. Clear as day.
That does not make you a bigot.

Read my post again and think it through. I know you can figure it out.

 

It's starting to look like this guy's criminal history (which is extensive) includes fraud . . . and that he failed the polygraph that he took. But I doubt any of Carlson's viewers are capable of critical thought anyway.

 

No one is saying that at all. Literally.

 

The issue is your false interpretation of what was said. THAT is the A to Z of the whole issue because Trump never said what you claim. So it doesn't matter how many times you post a video of him saying "Ha!" if you continue claiming he said "Ho!". So, copy your video (with your interpretive subtitles) as many times as you like, load them onto a B-52, and drop them all around the world so the whole planet can have a good laugh. Many nations have been wondering why Americans shoot each other up on a daily basis. Spread your video around the world and then they'll know.

 

There really is something in what you say. I've been thinking about the fact that the term "transvestite" is never used anymore and I'm wondering why. Your notion makes sense. Let us begin to recall all of these so-called "trans" people who've still got their plumbing intact and address them as "transvestites" and see what sort of reaction it will bring. "Ladies and gentlemen, on tonight's show we have the renowned transvestite Zoe Ambulánce! Let's give him a warm round of applause!"

 

An intelligent and insightful response. Now we're getting somewhere!

 

the questions I have are as follows:
If there is a video of him saying it, like in a news conference or an image where he wrote on social media, then how is that untrue? Or did you watch the video? Or if the video is irrelevant, how? to what extent? why of trump saying those things? Or is it perhaps the truth hurts and you "can't handle the truth?" And then you came up with this gem, defiance of actual meaning? So, let me ask you a question, without any internet research or any help from other members of this forum, even through private chat, what do you think the original meaning of gay actually means such as in the movie title, "The Gay Divorcee?"

 

LOL He literally said "I'm going to be dating her in 10 years"! after seeing the little girl going up the escalator. It seems like you have no problem of him talking about children like that. Next you will be claiming that it wasn't his voice

 

Dude, please try actually thinking. Try some intellectual honesty. They aren't just calling him gay. They are spreading false accusations about him being closeted, cheating on his wife, a coke head, and have even accused him of murder to cover it up. If he were gay, I wouldn't care, and neither would 99% of liberals. Hell, there are even a substantial number of conservatives who would have the integrity to not care. The problem is that we have proven liars like Carlson interviewing another proven liar to spread batshit insane conspiracy theories (not a first for Carlson) in order to sell a fake story to some of his fanbase that lacks the intellectual and emotional maturity to see past it.

 

you will have none with this poster I believe. He has been so indoctrinated with Trump's "mysticism" that he/she is a lost cause.

 

I'm listening.

"Saying it"? Of him saying "what"? If you are not going to be specific then we are wasting time and pixels.

I don't jump the gun or make neurotic assumptions. Let's see your response to the first part before I kock the hammer on the rest of it. It may all be irrelevant and I don't want to waste my energy for nothing.

 

And what is your conclusion from that?

Context is everything. Have you ever heard a neurotic woman trying to talk her way out of a parking ticket?

Not unless it isn't.

 

What? If I had an 8 year old daughter and a 40 year old man said that I would be disgusted. You think that it is ok?

The context is in the video that you refuse to watch due to your devotion to Trump

It was Trump's production filmed in his hotel!

 

They aren't? Then why do democrats so demonstratively support the folks who don't want to be gay becoming the opposite sex? if being homosexual is something democrats actually did support, or women were a group democrats actually supported, trans wouldn't actually be an issue. But they don't. So literally, when democrats support trans, they are discounting the other groups that these policies of support most immediately impact.