“Trump claims …. Access Hollywood tape response was bravest thing..”

Wrong! Trump SAYS "they let you do it". But, of course, to MAGAs I guess that's the same as "it's written in the Bible"

The fact that the victims say different, have sued him and have WON lawsuits is nothing that cannot be dismissed with a good batch of Kool-Aid, though.

 

Democrats don't have "loyalty" to ANYBODY. We are loyal to doing the right thing. If the politician we like does the wrong thing, or if the party takes the wrong position, we DENOUNCE it. We are also loyal to facts. Compare that to Trump loyalists who keep making up excuses for a twice-impeached, four-times indicted sexual abuser who leaks our nation's secrets to our foes.

 

Ofcourse they do, they love rich people.

Thats not the same as assault.

Them suing is simply a political ploy, as is dems support of it.

 

Dems are loyal to party, and to Obama. If dems were loyal to the right thing, I would be on their side. That is simply the furthest thing from the truth.

"believe of women but only when it serves democrat purposes" is a perfect example of democrats idea of "the right thing".

But the reality, is dems are loyal to party above all. And ofcourse obama.

 

Funny thing about all this is that they don't DENY that Trump is a dictator wannabe who will do everything to perpetuate himself in power. They just respond with "Biden and his followers are the same". Which they never bother to substantiate. But they don't address the FACT that Trump even attempting to become a dictator will have long-lasting very negative consequences for ALL of us even if he doesn't succeed. How is it even POSSIBLE that any American would be loyal to THAT?

 

Dear God! One can only wonder in what kind of environment somebody who believes that women are all prostitutes who would do anything for money grew up in. I'm not a woman and I STILL find it insulting.

It's really disturbing what people will say in support of a criminal sexual predator.

Oh, and YES. It IS assault to take advantage of a woman because you're rich and she's not. Even if you pay her. I guess that's the conservative part of my ideology talking.

I did like Republicans better when they were conservative.

 

Incorrect, its the real world. Women have preferences, and of those preferences at the top of the chart for the overwhelming majority its drive and success in men. Money is one of the largest factors to be able to determine how much drive and success a man has.

Men who have that, have women.

Because women love it.

You can be wrong and disagree. But its the reality. You can incorrectly name call and label, but again, you are incorrect.

 

I think you made it clear already that you believe all women are basically prostitutes. You can stop repeating it now. I know I would never be able to explain to you how insulting those of us who love our mother, wife, daughters, ... or any woman in our life, find that comment. And the fact that you say that to defend some political "idol" makes it even more disturbing.

 

Ahh yes, typical liberal response. Instead of taking what I said for what I said, you create an entirely different narrative and then assign it to me lmao.

This is why dems cant win debates. You dont actually debate topics. They name call, misrepresent, lie, motive assign, then attack that assigned motive lol.

Regardless, the fact you couldn't even begin to refute my claim demonstrates you know its true. But it doesn't go along with what you WANT to believe. So you created a fantasy about what you wish I believed.

So yes. revel in your disgust of what you believe I am.

 

I must live completely different world then Trump and Trump’s supporter.

I never in my youth or today grabbed any woman against their will.

I never bragged about grabbing any woman to my friend in locker room or anywhere else.

I never heard any of my male family member or friends bragged about grabbing women against their will.

The way trump supporter normalize this issue seems like this is a everyday life in their world. The evangelical Christians who has been chanting “ Moral value in American society” , they were perfectly fine and think this is a normal behavior of a man. No this is not a normal behavior of a man, it definitely not a Christian behavior.

 

Nor has Trump. They let him do it.

 

I quoted what you said. I gave you a chance to correct and instead you doubled down. I would HOPE you still reconsidered. But I better not press my luck. I think you're more loyal to the Orange Idol than you are to any woman in your life that you are now accusing of being a prostitute.... if offered enough money.

 

And that’s make it ok to brag about it to journalist?

As I have said , I completely live in different world then all the “deplorables” . men in my world don’t brag about their sexual encounter to stranger.

 

You quoted a small portion of what I said, and then went on a completely unrelated tanget about what you wished I believed and ignored every bit of my thorough explanation. I didnt need to correct, as I am objectively correct and studies have been very thorough in demonstrating what men and women tend to value.

You can "think" whatever you wish about me. I am confident that your perception of me is based completely on misrepesentation of me based on what you wish I believed, rather than what I actually believe.

But again, you are wrong. As usual.

 

If you wanna take issue with his demeamor towards journalists and wether or not he should talk about certain things. Thats one thing. Your opinion.

But at no point did he ever admit to assault.

That is a leftist delusion. The left taking what is said, and hearing something comletely different. You can see my posts above, and another posters responses to them to see the EXACT same thing in action lol. Under normal circumstances I would report such deplorable behavior. But in this case I think its better it stay for everyone to see. Its rare that such obvious examples of these tendency demonstrate themselves so openly.

 

Yep! The part about all women being prostitutes. Your loyalty to a political figure over anything else became clear at that point. There is NO justification for saying that. All you have to do is say you DON'T believe that women let people grab them by the ***** if they are rich (that's prostitution, you know). Even if the rich abuser SAYS they do. But that would expose Trump's sexual abuse. Which would be... something akin to "blasphemy" in your mind.

You said what you said. You should either retract or OWN it. You can't have it both ways.

 

False, you never quoted me saying anything about women be prostitutes. Again, that is simply what you wish I had said and are making it up. You assigned me that perspective, it is not one I stated I have. And now you attack the perspective you incorrectly assigned me lol. You are literally arguing with yourself here.

You arent capable of actually addressing what is said and instead create an entire fantasy of what you wish I had said and attack it.

He didnt say what you claim he said, nor did I say what you claim I said. Lmao.

I have no need to retract, nor do I have a need to own anything. Its not just me saying it...its science. Take it up with them.

 

Women letting somebody grab them by the ***** because they're rich IS prostitution. The fact that you didn't know that (now you do) does not change the fact that you believe it. And that says everything we need to know about the concept you have of women.

 

You wont see the previous post, because like many dems...putting party before truth.

Its absolutely the left and their irrational take on what was said. You cant quote anywhere where he said he touches women against their will. Quite the opposite, they let him.

You can name call and label all you want, the reality is what you claim and reality aren't the same.

 

No it's not prostitution at all. That's objectively wrong. Prostitution is the exchange of money for sex. That's not even close to what happened nor what I said lol. You completely ran face first into being wrong by providing an incorrect definition. Full speed. You didn't even know what the actual elements of prostitution was.

Again, you completely made up your own fantasy argument and incorrectly assigned it to me and are now arguing with yourself lol.

 

What nonsense! Why would women allow rich people and not poor people to grab them by the ***** if it's not because of the money? Do I have to explain what the difference is between a rich person and somebody who is not rich?

Your desperation to justify yourself at least shows that you understand that it's WRONG to think like that. But that's not going to help unless you explicitly admit it.

 

It's not nonsense at all. It's true. Women are attracted to powerful wealthy driven men. It has nothing to do with prostitution lmao.

You are projecting. The desperation is on you trying to change my argument into something that you wish it was as opposed to what it actually is.

 

I am not the one who in public defending a man who likes grabbing woman by P***.

I rest my case.

 

They let him do it. And they are allowed to be ok with it.

I rest my case.

 

Again , the world I live, woman are not object. They don’t throw themselves to wealth and power. But then in my world we respect woman.

I see in the other world they see women differently.