When will Texas kick Joe Biden off their ballot?

Colorado just opened a new can of worms...If unelected judges can keep a man off the ballot who has never been charged or convicted of a certain crime... Biden's border policy , that lets thousands of illegal invaders to flood into Texas and the feds tie the hands of Texas... Threat to National Security, Threat to Public Safety, Threat to Border Security would all applicable for 4 unelected judges to remove Bidens name from their ballots

 

For insurrection??!!

Friendly "crazed thread" bump......

 

It won't happen, it is a reactionary statement to energize the base. The key will be how SCOTUS will rule on the appeal.

 

If all it takes to keep your political opponent off the ballot by the perception of a crime not charged, gosh, the endless possibilities. How about every red state in the country excluding democrats entirely from all ballots for their support of the invasion of the US? I know there's some language somewhere about enemies of the state, foreign or domestic that can most certainly could create a super thin veil the Colorado Supreme Court has just created.

 

Why does a ruling by the SCOTUS matter here? The state of CO supreme court just created a precedent. Why fall into the trap of allowing this BS to tarnish the quality of the SCOTUS then? If even you as a democrat are embarrassed by what these clowns in CO just did, you need to address them, not make the SCOTUS fix them. If, as you suggest, this wasn't a good call, make it a problem for them.

 

No for aiding and abetting Americas enemies to wit Iran.

 

How does that energize anyone? is it something like "we suck so bad that we better just remove the opposition all together"?
That sure seems like a strange ENERGIZING method to me.

 

Those 5 words say it all! That is the NEW precedent the left has shot themselves in the foot with. I look forward to seeing the aftermath of this NAZI move by the left.

 

Emotionalism in the MEGA base who will blame Biden if they soil themselves in their pants. That's how.

The irony is this lawsuit in Colorado was brought about by conservative voters, a couple of members of the Federalist Society, etc. The irony is if the ruling is upheld, it will help Republicans not democrats in the primary election and the general election.

 

This was not the left who brought the lawsuit. It was 6 Republican voters in Colorado who brought the lawsuit, supported by some of the attorneys who are members of the Federalist Society. It basically argued by two Federalist Lawyers that Trump is disqualified from running.

 

According to Trump, he is appealing to SCOTUS and SCOTUS has agreed to take up the case, and will allow up to January 4, 2024 to receive any more appeals.

 

When the central government is so dishonest and self destructive, the state governments have to defend themselves.

One innovation was for Texas to generously share the flood of immigrants with Democrat dominated states that
claimed the immigrants were a big help to the US.

And this is another innovation - that if courts can disallow one candidate, then why not disallow another candidate?

 

Thanks for the correction

 

When the President incites goons to attack outnumbered police defending democracy, and pleasures himself for four hours while watching it happen.

 

Gas lighting is not discourse but a form of propaganda. Surely there are better days ahead...

 

Scotus is the key in Colorado

Thanks to the Last Refuge who can break it down for you..
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-at-they-even-admit-it-on-page-9/#more-253983
https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...ation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

page 9....

As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.
In addition to the virtual guarantee the high court will overrule this political nonsense, SCOTUS can make the entire issue moot before them by following their own normal schedule for submissions, arguments, deliberation and opinions delivered by the court.
The Colorado appellate court knows this, that’s why they put this self-stay into their 4-3 ruling. It’s a politically correct way of giving the optics of telling their tribe, ‘hey we’re with you,’ without the ramifications of the political backlash. In other words, psychological lawfare stuff – intended for media consumption.

 

Prove it...

 

It was the state of Colorado Supreme Court. It was not the Biden Administration or any agency of the Executive Branch. Geez. Learn a few things before you post.

 

Welcome to the "When will Texas kick Joe Biden off their ballot?" thread.

 

Lol, if that's the case . Neither Biden or Trump would be on the ballot. Trumps border policies weren't any better.

 

When will Texas kick Joe Biden off their ballot?

Given our governments penchant for tit-for-tat politics it shouldn't be long

 

So stop doing it already. It is beyond controversy that Joe relaxed sanctions on Iran and turn loose billions in frozen assets. It is also true that Iran has declared us there enemy way before that.

 

I challenge you to go look up the statistics and I also suggest you tell all of the Democratic politicians BEGGING biden for border help that they are wrong and confused.
KthanxBYE

 

Yeah because to the leftist mind in need of an excuse 2+2 = 375,000.

 

And yet you, yourself, suggest that this is a horrible precedent. Why, as a democrat are you willing to allow this to stand? And worse, why are you clapping that it has happened? I would point out that every democrat talking head is also agreeing that there is no basis for the ruling. I suggest that this is intentional to focus hatred of the democratic base against the SCOTUS. I also suggest this is the creation of the basis for democrat insurrection. Summer of Love and all that BS again. Test it. This is what you get.

So, having given aid and comfort to the enemies of the US, by your own admission of the precedent, Biden and his cohorts who did the Iran deal, for example, should all be removed from ballots. right?