Too much evidence....

You do realize a lot of those in front of the camera are paid don't you? They don't exactly count,.

 

Like in Trump where those very same cameras were focused on or around Trump, the same thing with Biden. This is how the campaign managers really earn their salary. They want those people who will watch the YT videos and such to focus on what is behind the person. You see the same thing in Trump rallies if you are willing to see that.

 

The ones for Bidet, yeah, I know. Because the cameramen do pan away to show the lack of attendees. Just focus on the paid-for muppets, as they are the ones who will turn up. Because they were paid to.

 

The ones for Bidet, yeah, I know. Because the cameramen don't pan away to show the lack of attendees. Just focus on the paid-for muppets, as they are the ones who will turn up. Because they were paid to.

 

What you don't notice between the Bidet and Trump videos is that the Bidet ones displayed, just focus on the pay-for-crowd. Whereas for Trump, they pan all around at different areas. Attention to detail, and spotting those differences do help you perception.

 

The ones for Bidet, yeah, I know. Because the cameramen don't pan away to show the lack of attendees. Just focus on the paid-for muppets, as they are the ones who will turn up. Because they were paid to.

 

If you have evidence, please produce it. And while you are at it, submit it to the FBI/CIA/DOJ, because, apparently, your investigative skill is greater than theirs.

 

Sounds nice, but he didn't actually produce any 'hard evidence', he just bloviated that it exists, as are most on this forum doing, yet no one seems to have the actual evidence.

Interesting.

 

blah blah.

Trump censorship

https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/at...istration-censored-information-climate-change

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793038/

That was a cursory search, but this congress is not really interested in Censorship, they are just interested in impugning the integrity of Democrats.

More partisan bullshit.

 

Do you mean the kind of stuff YOU don't look for?

I don't apologies that this info is not from MSM.

 

I already have. Have you read all entries of this thread? No, I thought so.

 

Then when are you going to give to the FBI/CIA/DOJ since they could use it.

 

All of the above are corrupt, and they already know, as they are a part of it all. To cover the tracks of the Bidet crime family. FBI/CIA/DOJ are not the goody-two-shoes you think they are.

 

And I bet if there were similar allegations toward Trump, you'd be on that cheer squad, wouldn't you?

 

Then why do you guys keep talking about investigations, evidence, ect? Whose going to act?

 

Here is one guy.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerr...l-investigating-hunter-biden/?sh=f006d177a719

The evidence has been shown in posts within this thread.

Who can impeach a president?
https://moviecultists.com/who-has-sole-power-to-impeach

 

Yes. Too much evidence that they are all completely and totally corrupt, from the bottom up and the middle out.

FBI supervisor confirms: Hunter got tipped off about investigator interview by FBI, Secret Service



Looks like we need a Special Counsel for the Special Counsel.

'The notice was necessary, the SSA told the committee, for “de-confliction” arrangements with the Secret Service. That was supposed to happen at the time agents arrived, but instead, the FBI field office tipped off the Secret Service and the Bidens immediately. Needless to say, that ended any chance of direct cooperation.'

After that, 'the Secret Service refused to allow investigators to come into the residence where Hunter was staying. Instead, the Secret Service told the FBI that they had to wait a block away for Hunter to decide whether he wanted to talk with the investigators.'

'This may present the clearest example of a two-tiered system of justice applied to the Bidens. Who else has FBI executives and the Secret Service running interference for targets or subjects of federal tax, firearms, and influence-peddling investigations? That didn’t just happen as a coincidence, either. We need to know who ordered this obstruction and on whose orders they did so.'

 

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1752799008160936144?t=5SoO3sJyAUultgHrsu83Rg&s=19

The White House is REFUSING to hand over early drafts of President Biden’s 2015 Ukraine speech where he called for the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin. These drafts are important as it is believed, based on public reporting, that the then-VP “called an audible” and changed U.S. policy toward Ukraine to benefit his son on the plane ride to Ukraine. Joe Biden later bragged about withholding a U.S. loan guarantee if Ukraine did not fire the prosecutor. If the White House does not permit the production of these documents, our committee will consider the use of compulsory process. Read our letter to the White House Counsel.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFMwrj7XAAASRzr?format=png&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFMwrj7WgAAbDFv?format=png&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFMwrkAWUAAb3Ts?format=png&name=large

 

It is not "believed" by anyone except MAGA faithful.

ALL the evidence points to multiple groups wanting Shokin fired. It's just that the US had the leverage.

 

Well, you could start with some actual evidence . . . which you guys have failed SPECTACULARLY at. Is this the day you finally found something or is this another day of the usual lame, vapid, dishonest bull ****?

 

I'm going to go with the "usual lame, vapid, dishonest bull****"

Only because given past performance it's the most likely result.

 

Congressmen send a letter.... and out of the blue our faithful denier can't prove them wrong or offer a rebutthole.... just more nothing...

 

Shokin
Members of the Committee, clearly you know at that time there was a working group formed around what to do about Ukraine, and this group included Ambassador Geoffry Pyatt and CIA/NSC Eric Ciaramella. Both seemed shocked when hearing that witholding aid to Ukraine hinged on the firing of Shokin. In fact, Pyatt responds with "Buckle in", and Ciaramella says, "Yikes. I don't recall this coming up in our meeting with them on Tuesday." Interesting to note, last time aid was withheld to Ukraine by an Executive Officer, Mr. Ciaramella "blew the whistle" which triggered an impeachment hearing...but not in this case with Mr. Biden.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFM3p8KaQAASvAn?format=jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFM3p8IagAAop5c?format=jpg&name=small

 

and it conveniently benefited Hunter, Burisma and the "Biden Crime Family'!

 

I just watched the video. What was presented was opinions, or statements of opinions, but did not divulge any facts or actual citations.
Not saying there aren't any facts or citations, but this video is completed devoid of such.
Can you post actual facts that show the 'Biden family corruption'? I mean actual facts, not just allusions to them.