Joe Biden 'enabled' family to sell access to 'dangerous adversaries,' Tony Bobulinski testifies

Not a chance a stand up guy like Hunter Biden and Joe Biden would work with a business partner that scummy.

 

When Joe was on the phone with Hunter's business partners, it was simply to talk about the weather!



“As he described it, it was all casual conversation, niceties, the weather, what’s going on. There wasn’t a single conversation about any of the business dealings that Hunter had,” Goldman added.

So, you may be gulable enough to believe that Joe Biden just talked weather, or that by him not "talking about business" with Hunter's clients, that means he has nothing to do with it.... but occam's razor is pretty clear here.

 

Tony Bob didnt even meet him until 2017

 

I don't need to "simply explain" anything. Nothing in your reply is true.

There. Is. No. Evidence.

Pathetic, I say, and will continue to say.

 

Sorry, but the burden of proof is always on the accuser. If Biden did something illegal, there must be evidence, and so far, there is none. And this is after several years of digging.

See #77.

 

FFS! I'm not the one trying to convince anyone of anything.

You're the one trying to sell crap here, not me. I'm merely calling you on your bee ess. You and other righties here have been trying to convince the rest of us that Biden is somehow corrupt through his son's businesses. I'm merely asking for (so far nonexistent) proof, and dismissing the bullshit you guys keep spewing on this forum.

 

What evidence? There is none. Bobulinski's testimony has been debunked by at least eight other business partners.

 

On Joe's part, likely not.

 

I am not gullible, and calling me so is a personal insult. I simply refuse to believe things for which there is no proof. That's called logic, not gullibility. Try it.

 

You are confusing evidence as trying to convince anyone of anything.

24 shell corporations filed
None of which listed with the SEC which is required to host investments
None of which are reported to the IRS or have tax ID numbers
Hosting over 20 million wired to those accounts from foreign nationals who are hostile to the US
Wired out to Biden family members
That have no business products or services listed in any state
With their own business partner, they hired, testifying why these monies were provided to the Bidens

For those who choose not to ignore the evidence like it magically doesn't exist (like you) they don't need convincing. They can see the evidence for themselves.
But I do love watching the left dance around it.

 

None of that is evidence of criminal activity. I do not believe things that cannot be proven.

Period.

 

This thread is another bogus conspiracy thread, and certainly far from their first.

 

The evidence he submitted yesterday.

We'll see if it gets debunked...

 

LMAO - This is like watching Lois Lerner cop the 5th to conceal her innocence.

"THAT'S NOT EVIDENCE OF WRONGDOING!!"



LOL - Good times....

 

So you don't know that using shell corp accounts without SEC filings, IRS fillings, or an EIN while using those accounts to transfer millions, is illegal.

You don't know using corporate shell accounts to move money around, untaxed and unreported, is illegal.

Thats hilarious

Not to mention
You magically don't know that their were 170 major bank violations reported by bank investigators, from six major banks, provided the documents showing the Bidens were, among other things, money laundering, and receiving suspicious wires from state-owned entities.

You magically don't know the 24 accounts found, and provided to the public, show the Bidens received over 20 million dollars from foreign nationals.

But you magically don't know all this evidence exist?
Thats some bubble you live in.

 

Your dodge of the question is noted

Not surprising, but noted

 

And...SO WHAT?
PROVE (Repeat PROVE) that any of that money went directly to Joe Biden...
Can anybody PROVE that?
With irrefutable ironclad evidence?
I didnt think so...:smdh:
Next...

 

From your post: "About 20 times over 10 years". Averaged twice a year. I talk to my son twice every day, sometimes multiple times daily. We rarely ever discuss his job.
Occam's razor wouldn't apply in this situation.

 

Oh sick burn brah

 

You talk to your sons co workers on the phone a couple times a year?

 

Lied.

 

He does work alone most of the time, but frequently "business" associates are in the room when we are on speakerphone.
All I'm saying is that this bit of information alone does not really indicate anything unethical. Why are you overlooking that he said they didn't discuss business?
So he's telling the truth about what you want to hear, but lying about that which doesn't follow the narrative you want to portray.
What you're doing is cherry picking information. You must be a fan of "Ancient Aliens".

 

Ok, so why the need for 10's of shell companies and what did hunter get paid for?

 

I'm not sure why all the shell companies, but I know that's how business is done, particularly internationally. For example, if I have an investment business in the US, and someone from France wants me to invest in the oil business in Dubai, I would probably have to create a new business in Dubai to use for investments. That's why Trump has some 500 companies, as there are other benefits from creating new entities, including taxes, income, liability, etc.
Read the testimony from Devon Archer. It may help with understanding this. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Devon-Archer-Transcript.pdf
Again, I personally don't know the exact reasoning behind these actions, but they are definitely a normal method of doing business. In the investment business, liability could be a huge factor, but I'm definitely not an expert on that.
Just because I don't understand something entirely doesn't mean there is something nefarious about it.

 

What evidence? Some here say that his testimony is evidence. I disagree.