Trump is unable to find a seller for a $464 million bond

We may be seeing the collapse of the Orange Fraud's facade as a multi-billionaire.

 

If you can’t beat him. Bankrupt or imprison him. It’s the Democrat way.

 

You're deflecting from the point: He was already bankrupt, and by his own hand. The Orange emperor has no clothes.

 

What We Know About Trump’s Failure to Arrange a Half-Billion-Dollar Bond


What comes next?
Mr. Trump has appealed the $454 million judgment and asked a higher New York court either to pause it or to accept a lesser bond of $100 million. Ms. James could also grant additional time for Mr. Trump to pay or show mercy to the former president by offering a counterproposal.

He might appeal to the state’s highest court, quickly sell an asset or seek help from a wealthy supporter.

And if all else fails, as a last resort, he could have the corporate entities implicated in the fraud case file for bankruptcy, which would automatically halt the judgment against those entities.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/19/nyregion/trump-bond-ny-fraud-case.html

That would call for a celebration.

 

Meh. I am not going to keep going back and forth preparing ourselves on such a mundane topic.

 

thank you....

 

ahh look at them gloating about a man's misery due to ILLEGAL lawfare waged against him. TAG FOR ELECTION DAY!!!

 

That's the whole idea.

 

Does the Orange Stain look miserable to you ? He's out there lieing, insulting, threatening and acting just as arrogant and ignorant as he always has.
I don't see any misery there.

As for ILLEGAL, that's just plain FALSE. He got his day in court and lost after committing financial fraud routinely and persistently for over 10 years.
More fool he is to think he would never get caught and to leave himself vulnerable to his opponents by being such a criminal.

 

A more effective way to tag post for future finding is to use a key word often not used on the website.... so like "Honorificabilitudinitatibus" . Then when you want to find tagged post, you put your name in the search feature and search the keyword you used and it will pull up a list. "tag" is too short and won't be searchable IMO.

 

A day in court with a judge who already decided he was guilty and was focusing on the penalty phase. DBR - Democrat Banana Republic.

 

Once again, that was self-inflicted on the Orange Stain's part. Don't like the law ? Vote to change it, but until you do you get to abide by it.
Including your Orange Stain.

 

I think it will be best just to wait for republicans to return the favor when they come back into power.

 

Think about it. He was found guilty of financial fraud, so who in their right mind would still lend him money. Russia and China might do it, but they have their own motivations.

 

lock him up, lock him up

remember stormy's lawyer, funny how his phones got taped by Trump's FBI, and he got locked up.... must be lawfare (or could it be they broke the law)

 

Your side is the side who nominated the guy who believes that if you are a star you can grab women by the genitals with impunity.

Your side is the side who nominated the guy who said his detractors were 'vermin'.

Your side is the side who nominated the guy who called democrats haters of jews and will destroy the country.

Your side is the side who elected a man who screwed thousands out of millions in a fake university scam

Your side is the side who nominated the guy who used his connections as president to help his son-in-law score $25,000,000 management fee as blood money from the murderous Mohammed Bin Salman

And how many trash talkers on the right, on this forum, do you want me to quote, and I don't see you complaining about them? Did you ever complain to Zorro about 'lowering the level of discourse'?

Your fake outrage is noted

 

Oh yeah! Like they did when they all chanted "Lock her Up!".

It's just hilarious how MAGAs still believe things like these...

 

Sounds like YOU already decided that he's guilty...

 

Outrage?...Nah.

A better description would be a lack of respect based upon intellectual dishonesty and an unhealthy obsession.

 

Yes, putting criminals in jail is justice, and justice is an aspect of democracy. Democrats favor democracy, hence the name 'Democrat" is derived from 'Democracy'.

Putting criminals as leader of the country is the Republican way.

 

Interesting takes, thanks!

 

What, as if YOU are the intellectually honest one in this conversation?

Really?

In this thread:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...kely-to-be-violent-than-conservatives.617500/

the OP made this conclusion:

Basically, libs are about twice as likely to commit violent crime and a whopping 817% more likely to rob you.

Clearly the claim being made here is that 'liberals are more criminal'

You responded to Pro Line's comment, who was merely trying to point out the logical fallacy of the OP.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...nt-than-conservatives.617500/#post-1074711665

And your response was?

"The OP did not take this down to the individual level as you have. They instead cross-referenced Democrat voting districts with violent crime rates. There is nothing dishonest about such a breakdown. It is not predicting or reflecting the behavior of individuals, rather it is predicting the behavior contained in a voting district. There is undeniably useful information to be gleaned from such an analysis."

So calling liberals more likely to be criminals is honest? Is 'useful analysis'?

And you call yourself honest?

You failed to note the GLARING post hoc ergo propter hoc logical fallacy stated in the OP, and if you had done that, THEN you would have been honest, but no, you let the logical fallacy slide.

And you have the gall to say or imply that is you who are the honest one in this equation?

 

Saying there is "useful information to be gleaned" is intellectually dishonest?

I don't follow your logic. The person to whom I was responding was taking it to the individual level, and I pointed out that the analysis does not go to the individual level, rather it is about predicting behavior by voting district. I presume that you are inferring that I meant that therefore Democrat policies cause crime and poverty? That doesn't make any sense. I have not said, nor implied any such thing.

I find your position here puzzling to say the very least, and that's not even referring to the apparent reality that you are confusing things by mixing two different threads together for no apparent reason.

 

Seems like the fair thing to do would be to hold off requiring payment until after Trump's appeal, in case the verdict and sum are overturned, don't you think?

 

what do you mean "if you can't beat him"?? Biden gave him an old fashioned spanking

and ole Joe never had to leave his basement to beat trump

when Biden wins again in 24 the only people to blame will be the trrumpers

Trumps is a loser that beats himself.....at this point trump could not win with a head start

if the GOP ran any other republican that person wold spank Biden

the ONLY person that cannot beat Biden is Trump