Fedor Yakovlev: Gaddafi on the eve of victory Excuse me, please. I am a bad translator from Russian. But I hope that the basic idea of this paper will be clear to you. to be continued
Sorry ... I would like to introduce you to another view ... If you are not interested, I will not write any more articles from other countries.
Serves Europe right. This is their fault entirely. The USA did not want to provide anything but supply and moral support. But no, that wasn't good enough. The Euros needed someone capable of actually knocking out a sophisticated SAM defense network. So we did that and then we said, "okay euros! Have fun with your desert target practice" only 3 weeks later to hear they ran out of freakin bombs!?? Serves them right. (*)(*)(*)(*) em, i support Qadaffi because A)The man toot sweet disarmed and gave up all pretensions to any kind of weapon of mass destruction and was generally cooperative with President Bush and Obama on a wide range of issues. B)The man provided no strategic threat to either Europe, or the United States of America, or any of our economic interests in the region. In fact the man was in the plus column as far as the world economy goes and Libya's production is sorely missed. C)There is no proof that any of these "rebels" are anything that America would want to support in the struggle for their version of "freedom" and it seems that at least a sizable portion of the Libyan population does not support their struggle. There are other reasons but those are big 3. Mainly, I just like watching Europe fail miserably.
Failed? Really? Gaddafi barely controls 25% of the country. I see him gone by the end of July or mid-August.
I am pleased that the U.S. has normal people who think about the interests their country, not the аsshоle rebels from Libya.
The monkeys had access to weapons? And how long they can fight without the support of NATO? The people of Libya will destroy these beasts itself.
You must have missed the news today. Do you live in Libya? What makes you such a supporter of Khadafi?
What news? Tell me, please! No, I have never been there. I am not a supporter of al-Gaddafi. But I am opposed to the interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. In any military action. I think the Americans would not like military intervention, the Mexican government in the conflict in one of the southern states.
The French and the Brits are supplying weapons and body armor to the rebels. I did live in Libya briefly when my father was an oil exec there. Khadafi is immature and reckless.. Look at the history of Tariki..