Faux news has earned this title.

Talking involves diplomacy, PTIF. That is non-interventionism, not isolationism. If he was an isolationist, he would not even want to talk to Iran. As I said, isolationism must involve all of the below elements:

1. Decline in economic relations
2. Decline in foreign trade
3. Decline in alliances


Only one of those elements can be found in Ron Paul's foreign policy doctrine. That element is a decline in alliances. However, he is not for a decline in foreign trade or economic relations. If you have listened to his comments on Cuba, you would realize that he wants to expand foreign trade and economic relations. I am sure he wants to do the same thing with Iran.

 

Judge Napolitano on Fox Business Network's Freedom Watch is very good too.

 

Name calling is the 1st sign of a losing argument.

 

http://pvsi.net/politicaleducation.html

 

Paul would be an isolationist. He has stated that sanctions are an act of war. So he is against any form of enforcement.

He is an isolationist even former employees admit it

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...ks-us-shouldnt-have-fought-hitler_614883.html

 

Isolationists are for free trade?

get serious. Your argument is completely wrong and you know it.

 

They DO know it. but they are either paid bots, or imbeciles with a lack of imagination who are afraid to lose their career related to government's spending. either way, they are special cases, against our nation. and they are a MINORITY not a majority.

 

Now, that's funny!

 

Sanctions are actually more of an isolationist tactic than a non-interventionist tactic because they encompass a decline in economic relations and trade. If anything, Ron Paul wants to lift sanctions on nations so that we can have greater economic relations and trade.

 

There's an honest answer.

Thanks dp.

 

Do you really have that tough of a time reading?

 

Only to those that have a serious problem with reading could think the statement "I have the most financial contributions than the GOP combined" as someone saying "the majority of the troops support Paul". You keep exposing yourself as more like a liberal the more you post.

 

The debate has deteriorated into a discussion on trivial matters.

 

Well, we are pointing out the horrible effects FNC has had on the older, more senile public. They keep repeating the lies that FNC have told them no matter how much proof that they are wrong is presented.

 

No what you are saying is Paul is all over the board and sounds foolish

 

So Paul doesn't care what countries get Nukes?

 

No I am smart enough to see Paul is trying to deceive people. You are blindly following this deceiver.

 

Paul supporters want all threads to be about Paul

 

Why can we have them and no one else. Who is going to go for that logic. Oh yeah, we are Americans, that's different. lol
Ask the rest of the world what they might think of that revelation.

 

PTIF doesn't have "tough of a time reading"...... you have "tough of a time getting in touch with REALITY and understanding".

 

Apparently, FNC has offended the LIEberrhoids and their new partners, the Braindead Delusional Followers of the Political Idiot Ron Paul with REALITY ...... so sad.

 

You can say that all you want but the UN and Europe are all involved in sanctions on Iran

 

Fox news like everyone else that backed SOPA refused to cover it until the January 18 blackout. And like everyone else then spun it as Hollywood vs Silicone Valley. CNN was the only one I heard admit that their parent company backed SOPA. But I loved hearing Fox ask ask an "expert" who backed SOPA.

Martha: Claudia, who's pushing for this bill?

Claudia: Martha, Hollywood is all for these measures. They want a strong tool to crack down on piracy...

And though I usually try to catch a bit of news from as many outlets as possible, I'm breaking from Fox until they relax on their Romney campaign. That seems to be 20 hours of their day.

 

Riiiiight. I am the one following a deciever. Unlike you who follow Newt. Newt, the person that said over and over that he loves FDR, Teddy Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson, as some of his favorite presidents. FDR is his favorite, and there are plenty of clips of him saying so. Yet when confronted with the fact of who FDR is, Big government progressive without the shred of concern for the constitution, Newt flatly lies and says he never claimed FDR to be the best president. That is your deciever, that YOU follow. Blantant lies from Newt. Yet you can't show me one blantant lie form Ron.