The Enemy Expatriation Act (S.1698/H.R.3166) - A Statement From Anonymous

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by ironboltbruce, Jan 10, 2012.

  1. ironboltbruce

    ironboltbruce New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]

    THE ENEMY EXPATRIATION ACT - A STATEMENT FROM ANONYMOUS

    H.R. 3166: Enemy Expatriation Act (#EEA)

    The Enemy Expatriation Act is yet another treasonous bill similar to the National Defense Authorization Act that was signed into law by President Obama on New Years' Eve. The NDAA, which authorizes the indefinite detention of American citizens on U.S. soil, was met with outrage from the American public. The media largely refused to cover the NDAA until it was too late, and the bill had been signed into law. We are now faced with a similar situation. The Enemy Expatriation Act has been introduced in the House, and again, the media refuses to cover it. The American public have the right to know about a bill that could revoke their United States citizenship, and the continuing media blackout poses a serious threat to the freedoms this country pledges to provide its citizens.

    The Enemy Expatriation Act is a short, yet dangerous bill. The purpose of the bill is "to add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality" [ http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-3166 ]. Put simply, this bill gives the U.S. government the power to revoke your citizenship, thereby nullifying your RIGHTS as an American citizen, if they believe you are even merely SUPPORTING acts against the United States. The Obama administration has pledged not to use the NDAA against American citizens [THIS IS NOT CORRECT: SEE P.S. BELOW]. However, if this bill passes, you could be stripped of your citizenship, and subjected to the full, treacherous acts of the NDAA. You will no longer have your rights as a citizen to protect you.

    Who introduced this abomination to the House of Representatives? Charles Dent, a Republican from Pennsylvania's 15th District [ http://bit.ly/wcICxr ], and the sponsor of the Enemy Expatriation Act, posted the following YouTube video about his proposed legislation: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hzpr7bL1Iw4"]Comments on Enemy Expatriation Act (H.R. 3166) - YouTube[/ame]. One thing you should notice immediately is the dislike bar. This video has 9 LIKES, and over 1,000 DISLIKES at the time of this statement. In addition, an ongoing poll from popvox.com shows that 92% OPPOSE this legislation [ http://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr3166 ]. Charles Dent is no Representative of the American public by ANY meaning of the word. This bill is yet another act by the government designed to give them the ultimate authority over us. The last time I checked, the Constitution reads WE THE PEOPLE. Clearly, the government has no intention of serving its citizens if our lawmakers take no consideration of our opinions or our rights before attempting to pass legislation such as the NDAA and the Enemy Expatriation Act.

    In order to stop the Enemy Expatriation Act and all future acts of the U.S. government which revoke our freedoms and attempt to shred the last remnants of our Constitution, it begins with you - with all of us. The media refuses to provide us with the information we need to play a part in our own futures. The government refuses to allow any consideration of the direction we, the people, wish for this country to go. We must be the ones to inform the people. We must play an active role in our future. We are trained to be divided by the media, by the government, told that it's all about petty issues when it's not. Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, this is not a partisan issue. The issue at hand is our future, and the reality of the present is that the government is slowly revoking our freedoms and our voice. Inform everyone you know about these acts of Congress, and the government as a whole. Make sure they are getting the information they NEED, and not just what they want us to know. Knowledge is power, and the freedom of information is the key to uniting all of us around the issues that really matter. Spread this message to everyone you know. Speak out against these acts, contact your representatives, senators, congressmen and make sure that they know that these injustices will not be tolerated. United, we will restore the power back to the People.

    #Anonymous

    http://pastebin.com/1UcAYycK

    ###

    S.1698:

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s112-1698

    H.R.3166:

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-3166

    Related Image:

    http://ironboltbruce.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/enemy_expatriation_act.jpg

    FREEDOM > PNAC > 9/11 > AUMF > PATRIOT ACT > CITIZENS UNITED > NDAA > SOPA > EEA > FASCISM:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ"]9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, Pre-Release-v1.3; Low-Res. - YouTube[/ame]

    NO MORE LEFT. NO MORE RIGHT. TIME TO UNITE. STAND AND FIGHT!

    IronBoltBruce via VVV PR ( http://vvvpr.com | @vvvpr )

    P.S. Americans must NOT take comfort in Obama saying "my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens" in his signing statement for the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA). What about NON-military detention (CIA/DHS/FBI/etc.)? Besides, presidential signing statements are NOT laws!

    ###

    CYBERACTIVIST ALERT: Emails like this one are being blocked by Network Solutions and other ISPs using Cloudmark Authority and other Internet censorship systems euphemistically referred to as "spam filters". Sadly, those who most need to see this warning never will...
     
    RP12 and (deleted member) like this.
  2. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "to add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality"

    Thats pretty open language. Would constant protesting the Government be seen as "hostile" to the Government?
     
  3. Face

    Face New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    510
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where was everyone when the Patriot Act was signed the first time screaming how it erodes our civil liberties?
     
  4. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was trying to educate people and i was called everything in the book... It the "Patriot act" it cant be bad! < Sarcasm>

    I'm waiting for them to declare martial law and call it the Everyone Gets Icecream act.
     
  5. Iamyourfather

    Iamyourfather New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I just spat my cup of tea out... :-D
     
  6. hopeless_in_2012

    hopeless_in_2012 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,193
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well I for one have made a commitment to not give my vote to any politician who voted yes for the NDAA. Both of my senators and my Representative voted yes. All three will be voted against by me. This bill also has my interest, I will be researching further. Let's get rid of these politicians who continually think they can strip our rights from us.
     
    RP12 and (deleted member) like this.
  7. axuality

    axuality Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My assessment is that you are being paranoid.

    Juries send you to the electric chair or life in prison simply because they believe that you killed someone, even if you DIDN'T.

    Many things are done "if they believe".

    Not to mention that the Govt. could assassinate you if they so chose. They wouldn't publicize it, but they could do it.

    The problem with the thousand of you who voted "bad idea" on this are missing the fact that the Govt. COULD do some of these things, but WON'T.

    However, I believe the Govt. is trying to insure that 'bad guys' who WOULD kill you if they COULD, CAN'T kill you, even if they WANT to.

    I think anyone who supports acts against the U.S. should be punished. Maybe thrown out of the country. And I trust the Govt. not to conclude that I myself do not support acts against the U.S.

    That's one of the reasons why I don't check out library books on explosives, or pal around with Bill Ayers, or download material on building nukes or putting together bioweapons. Even if I wanted to study those subjects out of pure interest, with no malintent, I would opt to avoid doing it, thereby giving up some of my "rights" in the name of letting my Govt. help keep us safe.
     
  8. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its funny you call him paranoid then admit they could assassinate someone if they wanted to. Its your opinion that they wont. Governments dont grab for power for power they wont ever use.

    Define "acts against the U.S."
     
  9. JIMV

    JIMV Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,440
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is a power no administration should have as we all KNOW someone will use it some day. It is a direct affront to the Constitution.
     
  10. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is of no concern to leftists because a leftist is in power now. When a conservative is in power the leftists will protest. Leftists are hypocrites.
     
  11. WertyFArmer

    WertyFArmer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,760
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ask any Japanese American who was around during WWII if you think him paranoid. Or read up on this, if you feel it won't happen to "normal" Americans. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Act_of_1918
     
  12. Iamyourfather

    Iamyourfather New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You may be right, of course I remember Bush supporters defending the PA when the left condemned it. Partisan bull(*)(*)(*)(*) cuts both ways.
     
  13. BleedingHeadKen

    BleedingHeadKen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    16,562
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because it is illegal and immoral. To give it the status of law is to give government power to do an immoral thing without accountability or fear of consequence. Just because legislators vote something into statute does not make that thing moral.

    Government exists to expand the power base of those who run it. Your safety is only important insofar as it keeps you voting for more government. Politicians and bureaucrats fear a great deal more for their own safety than care about yours.

    Do you like autobiographical fiction? Check out Anatoly Rybakov's "Children of the Arbat." Rybakov was a member of the Party during the early years of Stalin's rise to power. He thought the party would conclude that he had only the interests of the party and of the Soviet Union in the things that he did which involved no plots and no thought of attacks on his government. Yet he was still convicted of sentenced to 10 years in Siberia. At least he was convicted, even if in a kangaroo court. The US government is trying to get around that and simply ship undesirables off without any process whatsoever.

    So it's not that the government is just trying to keep you safe. It's that you are only safe if you obey the millions of regulations in , including unknown rules like "don't check out library books that might raise suspicion". Violate any of those and you most certainly aren't safe from your government. You are free to live in abject fear, citizen, so long as you obey.
     
  14. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course I'm right. American leftists are bad people.
     
  15. Iamyourfather

    Iamyourfather New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And that is what's wrong with partisan politics.
     
  16. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Couldnt agree more. Would have added rep but cant right now. People are actually happy having rights taken away. As long as its "their" party doing it.

    Wish people would wake up. Politicians in general dont give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about you. They want your vote. Thats it.
     
  17. Serfin' USA

    Serfin' USA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    24,183
    Likes Received:
    551
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't see why they even bother with this.

    Under the NDAA, they can screw you with or without citizenship being involved.
     
  18. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because passing draconic laws is addictive?
     
  19. JIMV

    JIMV Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,440
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not just complain...they will pretend their fellow never had the power.
     
  20. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obama and his left handed pals need to pretend like theyve got a pair...

    We dont need to try those terrorists on American soil.

    If they were still running around Afghanistan, Obama would have no problem executing them with a drone.....

    All these law changes are unnecessary, and will result in less confidence in our government.
     
  21. SamVimes

    SamVimes New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :bump:

    bumping this, because this forum seems way to quiet on the topic.

    And there is a "bipartisan" campaign to take away our rights. I'm sure both "sides" are rather happy that most of you are too busy pointing fingers to realize your guys are just as bad.

    Please, all of you admit both parties are corrupt. And lets move forward from there. I've personally sent my congressmen, and one other I figured would be sympathetic messages. I've also started a petition to amplify our voice and raise awareness. Most people I talk to about this, wouldn't know about it if I didn't tell them. Don't stop educating people and don't give up.

    http://www.change.org/petitions/uni...-due-process-amend-the-enemy-expatriation-act
     

Share This Page