Oh Jesus Christ, Mitts the biggest corporatist of them all. His campaign contributors look just like Barack Obamas.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/R http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/scorecard/statebystate/r http://projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates/ http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html http://www.cbsnews.com/primary-elec...?party=R&tag=breakingnews;electionsticker http://www.gop.com/index.php/comms/comments/updated_delegate_count_3.16.2012 It does not matter what Paul WAS. He has retired from Congress and is not and won't be a factor in the presidential elections. Paul is a has been that never was. In a year, he'll be a footnote in obscure history books.
Paul is inconsequential. But true to form he won't quite as long as his lame brained supporters keep sending him money.
Paul and Gingrich now have NO reporters traveling with them. The 'embedded" national reporters have been assigned other duties. If the local news wishes to cover Paul or Gingrich, that is up to the locals. This is the campaign, Kiss of Death. April will have 282 delegates that will be "bound" to the winner. Paul will not get 1 delegate of those 282. There are a few others, that Paulobots will make believe he will get. And THIS: RNC rule No. 40(b) states: Each candidate for nomination for President of the United States and Vice President of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination. Effectively eliminating all of the Paulobots make believe delegates. He WILL NOT win 5 states so his name will NOT be entered for nomination.
If I went into politics, I would sure as hell want to bring with me my family and friends and anyone else I could trust so long as they were passably competent. I mean, if it was you, would you rather have the smartest people in the country lying to you and trying to manipulate you and sway your opinion . . . or would you rather have the honest assessments of a few average people you know you can trust - knowing that you can of course always call the experts at any time as well? Who would you rather have your leaders listen to? And, $300,000???? Really? You guys are upset over $300,000 divided between six people? (Money that Paul was free to spend in whatever way he saw fit?) Seems kindof messed up to me.
Actually there are MANY regulations covering the spending of campaign funds, including the hiring of family. But I'll assume that Paul is within those regulations. Not that it matters, he's going home to retirement soon.
I take it then that you have no problem with Ron Paul taking money meant for his campaign and instead giving it to his relatives. By the way, divide $300 thousand by 6. Each of those relatives averaged $50 thousand each.
If they were qualified who the (*)(*)(*)(*) cares? Plus, its his money so he can hire whoever he wishes.
Are they qualified? It's not his money. It's money donated by his supporters specifically to aid his campaign, not line the pockets of his relatives.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★ Restore ★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★☆ ★ ☆ ★  RON PAUL | CHAMPION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★ America ★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★☆ ★ ☆ ★ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬