PRESS: Romney Nomination in doubt – Brokered Convention likely

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_paul_vs_obama-1750.html

Paul was +1 early in Apr and +2 back in Feb. 2 weekly polls in the last 2 years. Paulobots live in a make-believe world.

Paul would have NO CHANCE against, "a candidate to be named later." Both his congressional career and his comedic presidential campaigns have accomplished NOTHING in over 3 decades.

That's who Paulobots want to vote for? The no where, no time, nothing, man? VOTE FOR PAUL, because he's NOT a factor. NEVER has been, never will be.

Terrific bull(*)(*)(*)(*)ter though.

 

Actually, what he is doing is more important than what the current politicians have been doing over the past few decades. He's denying the corruption. He doesn't vote for so many bills because they are not constitutional. He does not compromise with things that are unconstitutional. Combine that fact with an honest person that's genuinely interested in seeing America prosper, and that's a pretty (*)(*)(*)(*) good candidate. Much better than Romney who will bend to the majority's whim if it means winning the election.

Just my opinion.

Also, you might want to look closer at that data. When you compare all of the candidates, Ron Paul has the second highest overall ranking. And most of these polls have been with all of the candidates. So now that Santorum and Gingrich dropped out more of their voters are going to Ron Paul over Romney because he's more conservative. So we don't know the current poll results, but there's a very good chance it's higher than Romney now.

 

Ron Paul IS not a factor. Has not been a factor. Will not be a factor.

EVERYONE that thinks otherwise cannot understand reality.

Paul will MEAN NOTHING at the Republican Convention. Chances are about 99 t0 1 he will be home retired in Texas by then, but it makes NO difference where he is, HE IS NOT A FACTOR.

NEVER HAS BEEN.

His MISNAMED "support" amounts to less than 40% of less than 10% of the voters. Or nothing X .05

 

Ron Paul has done nothing in Congress and why he keeps getting elected is beyond me. Congressmen should be working to organize compromises that slowly advances your agenda, all Paul does is vote no. The legislation he authors has no chance of ever passing yet he refuses to bring others on board by backing of his stances.

His time in Congress has been an absolute waste of time.

 

"All he's done is vote 'no'"

That is exactly what we have needed. Too bad we haven't had more Ron Paul's. Maybe we wouldn't be in such a mess.

 

He kept getting elected because the people in his district care about the Constitution and enjoy voting for a man who is not a hypocrite.

 

what a load of hogwash, they elect him because they don't want to pay taxes

 

Sorry but Ron Paul has done much worse than just vote no. He has often voted YES too. AND. He has sponsored over 700 bills. That is more than the average Congressperson. However NO bill of any importance sponsored by Paul has EVER become law. ZERO out of 700.

That puts Paul in the Comedy Congressman Category.

 

At least they don't elect him because they want *other* people's taxes.

 

oh, but they do want other people's taxes and they get them, thanks to ron paul

[video=youtube;jqamsu3NIU0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqamsu3NIU0[/video]