Sharia Has No Place in America

You seriously are not regurgitating this are you? Your posts have already been debunked. And like Allen West, refuse to acknowledge your fallacies on what you are providing.

 

I have no idea what the hell you are talking about, because it has become clear to me that you are just babbling incessantly without any idea of what YOU are talking about. what do you mean by "what you provided is not not proof" ? Proof of what ? What th hell are you talking about ? And first you mention Stealth jihad, and then you start talking about terrorism. Those are 2 different subjects, didn't you know ? Do you know the first thing about this stuff ? Do you know the main difference between the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda ? As for hating Muslims who don't have the same views as us, don't you think it is proper to hate >>> mass genocide, wife-beating, severe misogyny, rape, pedophilia, slavery, supremacism, sedition, totalitarianism, torture/mutilation, animal cruelty/killing, lying (modern taqiyya), and other vile things which are part and parcel of Islam ? and SHOULD BE HATED !! (and they are all ILLEGAL under US law as well)

 

Perhaps you need reading comprehension lessons on what you wrote and the sources you provided.

 

Perhaps you need reading comprehension lessons on what you wrote and the sources you provided.

 

Sources ? LOL. Listen closely again little Miss inexperienced in this forum. I have been trouncing Islampaologists who come in here thinking they can use the invalidation card around here, and thereby invalidate what protectionists say.

EARTH TO ALWAYSSA: You can't. Unless you would **** to show me that you have read the book They Must Be Stopped, or Stealth Jihad, or Infiltration, or Sharia: the Threat to America, or Muslim Mafia. So which is it ? You want to show that you even know the first thing about the sources, by having read the books, or do you want to reemphasize that you don't know what you're talking about (which of course I already well know), by NOT having read them, but instead, are just following instructions from your Islamapologist masters, who tell you to pronounce all protectionist literature as "invalid" ?
(thereby hiding behind the invalidation card) What you come blundering in here with, I've shot down 1000 times before.

Invalidation is hard-wired into Islamapologists.

 

You need serious help. It has beep proven through your writing that when people do not believe you when you make unfounded claims, you get upset. That is not how the real world works, never has.

 

You need serious help. It has beep proven through your writing that when people do not believe you when you make unfounded claims, you get upset. That is not how the real world works, never has.

 

I'm not a bit upset. You're the one here who doesn't have any forum credentials (OPs, posts, Likes). You're the one who started personal attacks upon me. Look in the mirror. Not my problem, MS QUIZ ZERO. If I ever was to get upset, it would take a lot more than an ignorant, newbie nobody to cause that to happen. You're just another routine Islamapologist QUIZ ZERO, among many others. You're kind of like the fly that comes along once in a while, and we just shoo him away.

PS - do you consider THIS also an "unfounded claim" ?

"The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a "Civilization-Jihadist" process with all that the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood in North America] must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" their miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated, and Allah's religion is made victorious over all religions."

Mohamed Akram, "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" May 22, 1991, Government Exhibit 003-0085, United States vs. Holy Land Foundation, et al.

 

Did you say something?

 

I don't recall taking this 'Islamization quiz'. Perhaps you might remind me and post a link to it, and my responses?

 

Christianity, Sharia, Mormonism... whatever.

Maintain strict Separation of Church and State, and we'll be just fine.

 

All the bad things you allude to above, including genocide, animal cruelty etc, etc, have all been found quite recently in Western nations. Animal cruelty, especially, in America; de-barking dogs, wiring their ears, de-clawing cats (amputatiing the first knuckles of their feet), imprisoning sentient mammals (whales) for your amusement...vile indeed.
I'll happily provide examples of all the others as perpetrated by the West if you like...?
How's abour serial, institutional paedophilia among Catholic clergy? This is far too easy!

 

"Accomplished poster" Is that what you call yourself? Accomplished in what, exactly-hatred, ignorance and bigotry? That I can agree with-oh, and we know exactly who we're talking to, Mr. 200 OPs big shot Islam 'expert' lol. And you spent ELEVEN YEARS obsessing over Islam? You seriously need help! Really.
Here's a hint; quantity does not equal quality-as amply demonstrated in your absurdly Islamophobic post history. Forum 'credentials' are meaningless, and it really is quite sad, and telling, that you attach such importance to them.

 

SO you get a ZERO then. That's what my teachers always did, when we failed to show up for a test, or just didn't take it. No need for any links. Either you take the Quiz or you get a ZERO. Want to take it ? It's right here in Post # 446. Go for it.

 

Looks like it was actually quite difficult for you. All the bad things I alluded to are not endorsed by Western nations, not advocated by them, and certainly not commanded by them. By they are by the Koran. Finding something existing somewhere, among delinquents mostly, is a different thing than being advocated and commanded by a so-called "holy" book. Also, I don't see Western nations committing genocide, or anything approaching the senseless massive slaughter of animals that occurs once a year on Eid al-Adha. And pedophilia among Catholic clergy is not "institutional", it is abnormal from the standard.
The things I mentioned are outlawed in the US. They are acceptable in Islamic law.

 

1. Yes, sure I call myself an accomplished poster >> Having accomplished about 200 OPS containing lots of facts about Islamization (like the one in Post # 459), and other subjects. And accomplished in a hatred of hatred (ie. Islam), knowledge from research, and a protector from the bigotry of Islam. And I would call anyone else with that number of OPs an "accomplished poster" as well.

2. You have already demonstrated your ignorance of Islamization MR QUIZ ZERO. And regarding a knowledge of Islamization, (that's what we're talking about), quantity certainly does play a very large part in quality. The more information you have, the more you know, and the better a specialist spokesman you can be on a particular subject. I also wouldn't say forum credentials are meaningless. And 11 years of study of a subject is not meaningless or sad, or whatever other adjective you're tossing in here.

3. Lastly, as I've said about 1000 times in this forum, there is no such thing as Islamaphobic. Phobias are irrational fears of something. After 20,000 violent attacks by jihadists since 9/11, we can easily conclude that a fear of this is not one bit irrational. And neither is a fear of Islamization, after thousands of instances of it. Just ask Paul Harvey, Michael Graham, Michael Savage, Major Stephen Coughlin, Professor Thomas Klocek, former Rep. and presidential candidate Virgil Goode, Cal Thomas, Lina Morales, producers of Sum of All Fears, producers of 24, Atlanta public schools, etc, etc., all victims of Islamizer Muslims.

 

Protectionist, you are worrying over nothing.

Sharia Law is not coming to the US.

Okay?

You do have some very real things to worry about though.

Why fret over that which is not going to be, and be blind to that which is real?

 

Ironic.

The American Taliban rejects the Islamic Sharia Law, but want to enforce their own version of Sharia Law.

 

Yeah, you're right, there are some very paranoid peopole around who love being imaginary victims. Furthermore, as a proud MR. QUIZ ZERO I have absolutely no intention of taking part in some infantile, partisan quiz of loaded questions. When did you stop beating your wife?

 

Open admission that you haven't done your reading assignment. Now get back in there and hit those books, and don't come back here again until you have a full report of all ( No, I'll settle for most) of the thousands of instances of Sharia law being imposed on Americans, over the past 21 years. Go on. Git.

 

Upon what do you base the claim that the items in the QUIZ are somehow "loaded questions" ? One glance at the Quiz and you can plainly see there are no questions, period. It is a Quiz of identification. Just simple identification of many of the most well-known (to protectionists) and obvious items of Islamization, that anyone with even the most basic knowledge of the subject would certainly know. But your "absolutely no intention of taking part" is a clear indication that, like all the other Islamapologist, big-mouth know-nothings, you are just another Islamaplogist, big-mouth know-nothing. You punked out. You got a ZERO.

I've got a better suggestion for you (if you're not a Muslim Islamist). Read the books I suggested earlier. Come back after that (WITH KNOWLEDGE), and take the Quiz, and show THEN that you ARE knowledgable. Wouldn't that be better ?

 

To the average US citizen, which do you consider a more imminent concern.

The NDAA act OR Sharia Law being implemented in the US?

 

I'm not sure if when you say "Sharia Law being implemented in the US" that you and I are defining that the same way. In fact I think we might have 2 completely different conceptions for that. As far as how I define it, it would by far be a more imminent concern. In fact, I have no concern about the NDAA Act at all, imminent or otherwise.

 

Who says? Sharia Law doesn't knock on your door asking to enter. It kicks your door down and tells you how its going to be in your own house. I agree it is a stretch and its not going to happen in my lifetime for sure but (*)(*)(*)(*), why does the US have to help them in places like Syria?

 

Just a short recap:
Sharia law is not coming to America because the Constitution protects us all against religious extremism.
The Constitution also protect Muslim Americans from religious persecution advocated by the Islamophobes.