Responses to Posts in thread I was banned from:

These are responses to posts in the Islamaphobia? What really are you afraid of? thread.



Originally posted by SF JEFF:
.
"And if there were any evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood was acting seditiously in the U.S., i t would be outlawed- like many muslim organizations have been. Imagine- requiring evidence before making an organization illegal. What is the U.S. coming to."

My response: There is no "IF" involved here. I already posted the evidence with the MB Explanatory Memorandum. And no, it wouldn't be outlawed, because the people in charge of our govt (especially Barrack Obama) are friends with the Muslim Brotherhood. And Obama has MB people working in his administration as well (Huma Abedin, Mohemmed Magid, Rashad Hussain, Dalia Mogahed, to name a few.

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...-obama-administration-muslim-brotherhood.html

 

Originally Posted by: Ronald0

"Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil by Group, From 1980 to 2005, According to FBI Database

Islamic Extremists - 6% ; Jewish extremists 7% ; Latino 42%"


The FBI is notorious for pandering to Islamic extremists. I wouldn't believe their numbers for a second

 

Originally Posted by: SF JEFF

"Ah everything is a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood- eh?"

"CAIR- Cair was accused of being a front for Hamas during the Home Land trial...but I don't see it for the Muslim Brotherhood."

"CAIR pointed to an arrest of five men in Pakistan on December 10, 2009, as a "success story"[citation needed] between Muslims and Muslim community organizations (like CAIR) and American law enforcement authorities. When the five men left Washington for Karachi on November 28, the families of the men discovered an extremist videotape. Worried, they contacted CAIR, which setup a meeting with the FBI on December 1, and the families shared their sons' computers and electronic devices with FBI agents. A U.S. law enforcement official described them as models of cooperation. CAIR hoped the event would ease "strained" relations of American Muslims with the FBI."

1. Everything isn't a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood. But those organizations that the US Justice Dept designates as Muslim Brotherhood fronts sure are. I wouldn't see any reason why any American would deny that. Unless they themselves happen to be members of one (or more) of those Muslim Brotherhood front groups.

2. CAIR is the Muslim Brotherhood - front group. As are many other stealth jihadist groups specified in the Holy Land Foundation trial.

3. Whatever CAIR hopes is in the same end goal of the Muslim Brotherhood. A "...grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within...so that it is eliminated, and Allah's religion is made victorious over all religions."

 

Mods please close this thread. It bears no topic to discuss.

 

In before the close.

 

Of you want to go back to the thread, just talk to a mod about it.

 

AHA

HA

HAHAHAHAHA

HHHAHAAAA

HAHAHAHAHA

Stop it, you're killing me.

 

Haven't done the homework ? Easy solution. Do it.

 

You still seem to not understand that it's up to YOU to prove YOUR arguments. It's not up to others to prove it for you. You made an idiotic claim and have been called on it. You need to prove your claim or admit it's nonsense

 

Originally Posted by:

SF JEFF

"There is no such thing as an Islamapologist."

They go around spouting off talk that everyone knows is FALSE, and then have to go around using FALSE words like "Islamaphobia (which everyone knows doesn't exist) to cover up for it. Must be hell to be an Islamapologist.

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...0-political-forum-islamapologists-frauds.html

http://www.flickr.com/photos/glenhsparky/5262443197/in/pool-940897@N24/

 

Originally Posted by: SFJEFF

"No by definition, every American's right to worship freely is protected by the U.S. Constitution. You cannot bypass the Constitution by pretending a religion is not a religion."

One cannot bypass the Constitution (Article 6, Section 2), by pretending that an immoral, illegal ideology is a religion.

 

This has already been refuted. The supremacy clause has absolutely no relevance in any way to the topic. Islam of course remains a religion, protected by the US constitution

 

Originally Posted by: Mayerling

"Women were given these rights under Islam way before they were given these rights in the "western world" You have no idea as to what you are saying."

What I'm saying is the same thing that probably 99% of everyone in the world is saying (including Muslims themselves), and that is that, under Islam, women's rights are practically non-existent compared to men, and compared to women in the Western world. To infer otherwise is ridiculous.

Among the gravest oppressors of Muslim women today are Family Laws, the legal frameworks governing marriage and divorce, inheritance, and custody. These laws are the front-line in the war between traditionalists and modernizers. Laws about women remain in the grip of medieval legal reasoning about the family. They vary by nation, but their message is consistent: the husband is the provider, and the wife submissive. It is Family Laws that mean a Malaysian woman who goes against the 'lawful' wishes of her husband can be judged 'disobedient', and lose her right to maintenance. It is Family Law that an unmarried woman in Jordan is legally under the control of a male guardian until the age of 40. It is under Family Law, as practiced in India, that a Muslim woman can find herself divorced, unilaterally, by text message.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1879864,00.html

http://bulletinoftheoppressionofwomen.com/

http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2007/10/violent-oppression-of-women-in-islam.html

 

NONSENSE! Islam, clearly is a supremacist ideology, and nothing illustrates it better than the Muslim Brotherhood's primary goal doctrine >> their Explanatory Memorandum. To illustrate the total contradiction and opposition of these two, I will post both of them here now. First the US Constitution Supremacy Clause.

US Constitution - Article 6, Section 2, the Supremacy Clause

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

Muslim Brotherhood Explanatory Memorandum

"The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a "Civilization-Jihadist" process with all that the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood in North America] must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" their miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated, and Allah's religion is made victorious over all religions."

Mohamed Akram, "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" May 22, 1991, Government Exhibit 003-0085, United States vs. Holy Land Foundation, et al

Pure illegal, UNCONSTITUTIONAL supremacism (and many suras of the Koran could easily be shown to be as well).

Rahl, we've heard your position. 10-4. Message received. You need not repeat yourself. If you do, that is badgering/harassing/fighting, and will be reported. You stated your position. Once is enough.

 

It used to be Black People, then Roman Catholics, then Jews, then Communists-and-anyone-in-McCarthy's-way, and now it's Muslims. You'd think they'd get bored with such drivel, wouldn't you?

 

Originally Posted by: Mayerling

"They are dogs."

Great. Who cares ? In America, "dogs" are known as "dogs". We don't need any foreign words (especially from inferior cultures).

 

Originally Posted by: Mayerling

"The Copts in Egypt ( according to my Coptic friends) are fearful of increasing enforcement of sharia under the current regime as is seen is Saudi Arabia . Secular Muslims are nervous about sharia law replacing napoleonic law in the criminal courts."

As well they should be. Especially women, children, gays, apostates, and non-Muslims.

 

Originally Posted by: SFJEFF

"According to University of Toronto professor of women's studies Shahrzad Mojab, followers of Hinduism, Islam, Sikhism, Judaism and Christianity have used their religions as a rationale to commit honour killings. She said that honor killings don't have "any definite connection with religion at all", and that honor killing had been practised before any major religion came into existence. So are honor killings only bad when they are done by Muslims? Or do we all agree that they are bad regardless of who does them?"

HA HA HA HA !! Standard Islamapologist technique. Get Islam off the hook for some of its most vile practices by (FALSELY of course) claiming that other cultures do it too. What ludicrous NONSENSE. Oh gee, so Shahrzad Mojab is a university professor. Wow!

So what! I was a university professor for 4 years in the City University of New York, and I say that what Mojab is saying is preposterous Bullsh-t, and nothing less. There is no end to the idiocy that Islampapologists will toss out, as they engage in their usual practice of rewriting history to suit their ends (and actually expect intelligent people to believe this trash).

Remember, unlike Christianity, LYING is OK in Islam (taqiyya).

 

No, it didn't "used to be Black People, then Roman Catholics, then Jews, then Communists-and-anyone-in-McCarthy's-way". Not in America. They were not supremacist and seditionist, as are Muslims. Big difference. As for these groups in the UK.....not my problem.

 

American right = racist nutters and bullies, perhaps? No problems here, except for Daily Mail reporters: it's quite a civilized place still, despite the Occupation.

 

Originally Posted by: mutmekep

"Honour killings are also the vendettas in Crete, Sicily and Corsica , no muslims there either."

"Corsica, the birthplace of Emperor Napoleon and of untold numbers of French soldiers and civil servants, once a peaceful island department off the Riviera, has over the past twenty years gradually slid into anarchy, terrorism, and then into separatism, all without eliciting a credible response from the national government. This precedent cannot be lost on Muslim activists." (http://www.meforum.org/337/islam-in-france-the-french-way-of-life-is-in)

Besides that there are Muslims there, even if they had all left (evicted by normal people), there could be some honor killings among the non-Muslim population as a result of the previous Muslim presence which spreads its deranged culture everywhere it goes. The less-intellectually endowed portion of the non-Muslim population pick up the bad Muslim habits (like a cancer) and perpetuate them.

All the more reason for countries to keep this cancer out of their borders, and ban it and expel it when it shows up.

 

..........

 

What about Judeo Christian brotherhood?

 

Thread closure notification. We thread ban for a reason.

Shangrila
Site Moderator