High taxes on the rich is a bad idea

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by General Fear, Jan 3, 2013.

  1. peoplevsmedia

    peoplevsmedia Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    6,765
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The lack of understanding is what's pathetic. the country is broke NOT because it is not robbing the rich enough, but because it is usurped by international bankers and has to pay the interest on every dollar borrowed. youtube zeitgeist federal reserve and watch the whole movie, then we can talk. you are looking at the problem ass backwards.
     
  2. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    It depends on what you mean by "high" taxation. I consider high taxation to be in the ninety percentile, like it has been the case during previous and historical times of war.
     
  3. JEFF9K

    JEFF9K New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't let the door hit you on your way out to Russia.
     
  4. custer

    custer New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,927
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes. As I said, without Japan or Germany having a hugE manufacturing base, mainly in autos, America was able to soar in jobs and wealth. Not due to taxes.

    If ur looking at he rise of awest shops and international trade in Asia, stwrt with the Bietnam war carriers out by Kennedy and Johnson.

    Nice try though
     
  5. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I think America's economic history generally proves you wrong.

    We allowed MASSIVE breaks for those at the TOP of the economic ladder. Where has that really gotten this nation?
     
  6. MissJonelyn

    MissJonelyn New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    6,144
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Top of the economic ladder gets to stick around to contribute to 97.76 percent of the tax share and create jobs for the economy. While the rest of those nations who are following France example... Well you figure it out.

    Two-thirds of millionaires disappeared from official statistics to avoid 50p tax rate

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...fficial-statistics-to-avoid-50p-tax-rate.html
     
  7. Roy L

    Roy L Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    11,345
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But not nearly as much as tax BASES.
    It's not rocket science. Tax the privileged and they will leave, their privileges intact. Tax the privilege, and it can't leave.

    99% of people will say, do, and believe anything whatever to avoid knowing that fact.
     
  8. Roy L

    Roy L Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    11,345
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's true that every country where government revenue is a small fraction of GDP is a $#!+-hole. A high government revenue fraction doesn't guarantee a country won't be a $#!+-hole, but a low government fraction guarantees it will be.
     
  9. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    The wealthy are not and never will be the 'saviors' of all Americans. That bogus perception just needs to die.
     
  10. MissJonelyn

    MissJonelyn New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    6,144
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show me a country with no wealthy and I'll show you a country which is suffering.
     
  11. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Simply claiming that the wealthiest contribute more in overall taxes under any form of Capitalism where economic discrimination is both legal and socially acceptable, is disingenuous at best.

     
  12. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    It may depend on what you mean by "suffering", since the wealthiest may have an easier time getting into a divine Commune of Heaven.
     
  13. ragin cajun

    ragin cajun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,189
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    who in the usa is a victim of economic discrimination?
     
  14. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Anyone in (official) poverty.
     
  15. ragin cajun

    ragin cajun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,189
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you think that everyone in official poverty is there because they were discriminated against? Please explain. Who discriminated against those whites in poverty in the coal country of West Virginia? Who discriminated against those blacks in poverty in our major cities?

    How is it discrimination when one person is more successful than another? Who did Oprah discriminate against? who did Michael Jordan discriminate against? who did Snoop dog discriminate against? who did obama discriminate against?

    you need to stop feeling sorry for yourself and enter the real world. anyone in the USA can succeed. No one is discriminated against economically.

    Failure is not discrimination.
     
  16. ragin cajun

    ragin cajun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,189
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you think that everyone in official poverty is there because they were discriminated against? Please explain. Who discriminated against those whites in poverty in the coal country of West Virginia? Who discriminated against those blacks in poverty in our major cities?

    How is it discrimination when one person is more successful than another? Who did Oprah discriminate against? who did Michael Jordan discriminate against? who did Snoop dog discriminate against? who did obama discriminate against?

    you need to stop feeling sorry for yourself and enter the real world. anyone in the USA can succeed. No one is discriminated against economically.

    Failure is not discrimination.
     
  17. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    You are misunderstanding my argument. Anyone in official poverty is being discriminated against under our form of capitalism, with our institution of money based markets. Consider a hypothetical that suggests this would be less of an issue, by simply solving for a poverty of money in our money based markets.
     
  18. General Fear

    General Fear New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2011
    Messages:
    665
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay. Let's take your example to the extreme. How about we tax the rich at 100%. Take all their money. You think they will stay in the US? What happens when the rich decide to leave with their money? Who is going to pay for your welfare state then? The middle class?

    The US should have a tax regime that is competitive with other industrial nations. That why all those French and European rich people come to the US and write their billion dollar checks to the US. The world's rich people should be coming to the US not Russia for tax relief.
     
  19. ragin cajun

    ragin cajun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,189
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    sorry, but you are not making much sense. People are in poverty because they do not work, or work at low paying jobs. Wages are set by supply and demand. Low skilled jobs pay the least. Thats the reality of life, always has been, always will be.

    We should make education and job training available to those who want to work their way out of poverty, but for those who are too lazy, TS.
     
  20. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Why are you so disingenuous for your Cause? How well did your philosophy work during the Great Depression? How is structural unemployment the fault of any individual labor market participant?
     
  21. MissJonelyn

    MissJonelyn New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    6,144
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ill put it in this way:

    No amount of suffering Americans feel can compare to how anyone else suffers elsewhere. The poverty stricken actually live like middle class citizens all around the world. That's pretty much wealth America (and other nations similar) has accumulated thus far.
     
  22. MissJonelyn

    MissJonelyn New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    6,144
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are you trying to show me with that meaningless source? People under capitalism has under a higher standard of living than anywhere else in the world.
     
  23. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    459
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    But, it could be claimed, only by subsidizing poverty for free, in the name of lowering costs.
     
  24. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Grovellers prefer their masters not to pay taxes, Buy them whips, serfs!
     
  25. kotcher

    kotcher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    559
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    18
    This is true, but it is not 100% Capitalism, we see less than 40% of our capital, the rest is confiscated by the people of Government. Imagine how great our lives would be if we could once in life live in a free world of liberty where everyone enjoyed Capitalism.
     

Share This Page