Satan's lies

Evolutionist often use fossils to persuade us that the earth is older than the Bible states.
Witch you can explain with the trickery of Satan. Satan uses many forms of trickery and temptation.
Now Creation Scientists have repeatedly proven the exact date of the earth; something that Evolution Scientist can't do. They can only come up with a approximation of how many billions of years. That's not a very accurate dating method if you ask me.
God made the earth 6000 years ago, and when he made it he made it with age. so it appears to some that it is older than they think, but it was made with age so it is only 6000 years old. Now as for fossils God did no make fossils rather Gods adversary made them.
The fact that fossils are made of rock implies that they were never real. How could an animal live with a skeleton made of rock. imagine if it were to break a bone how would it heal it is impossible.
When Satan fell from grace he wanted to be God himself. God rebuked him and removed him from Heaven.
Although Satan can not create live himself he can manipulate and trick us in to his sadistic ways.
I encourage you to use your own mind. Not every on has time to home school their children so that is why frequent Sunday School attendance is so crucial at this point in time.
There are many more points that help dispel the myth of evolution leave a post of more to create a tread of talking points people can use to prove Creationism. And please only supporting points this is not a debate thread.

 

Ladies and gentlemen:

Exhibit #1 for the reason why we call Creationists ignorant idiots. This poster thinks fossils mean that animals had rocks for bones.

 

What evidence would persuade you that fossils, radiocarbon dating, and so forth are actually accurate and are not deceptions of YHWH's chief prosecutor?

Just because they can give an exact date doesn't mean it is accurate.

That's because the earth was, at one point in time, an amorphous blob of superheated matter that took millions of years to coalesce into the roughly spherical shape it has been for the past 4.5 billion years. Because it gradually converted from a portion of the sun's accretion disk to a full-fledged planet, there is no one instant you can point to and say "ah! there! it's earth at this exact moment and not a second previous!"

So, YHWH is intentionally trying to deceive the people he endowed with reason and skepticism?

Sounds like a complete (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*).

Proof plz.

For one, our bones are already made of rock, essentially. It's made of hydroxylapatite, which is also a naturally occurring mineral: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxyapatite

Calcium carbonate makes up the material of marine shells and snail shells, and it too is a naturally occurring mineral and would be described as a rock by most laymen if they found a hunk of it out in a field somewhere.

Secondly, fossilization is a process wherein the calcium and carbonate ions within a bone are gradually replaced with other minerals found in ground water. This change rarely occurs, but there's been so many things that have died in the past 1 billion years that have been multicellular that a small fraction have become fossils. This small fraction is still enormously huge in absolute terms, though.

There is no scriptual basis for this interpretation; the Bible shows Satan as YHWH's chief prosecutor to ferret out disbelief in his flock, while the serpent that tempted Eve was simply a snake.

Not that I'd trust the mythology of Bronze Age pastoralists as being accurate descriptions of the origin of the earth to begin with, but there's nothing to even support your interpretation of the myths as written.

Unless using one's own mind means coming to the opposite conclusion. :v

Sorry, you can go to Rapture Ready if you just want sycophants and an echo chamber.

 

Troll!

 

A Christian friend who is a scientist had an idea on this in Genesis the Earth was present it was void and without form. He proposed as an idea theologically not scientific in nature the fossils of the dinosaurs and humanlike ancestors were from a previous creation, before the current one we are in and therefore the fossils could be ancient since they are. He also had an addition that the genetic codes are the same since god being a rational being used the same tested "blueprint" in this creation just making it fit the needed age and diversity of life so it appears older.

I will note for the science side he does support evolution as the visible and rational view of life as observation and testing demonstrate he is a creationist by act of faith not science.

 

So does he think that there was another destruction that took place before the flood. In witch case God would have had to make the first earth and destroyed it once before.

 

yep, and of course a real god would not have to fill the bathtub it to drown his children... he could just snap his fingers and it would be over

 

I am so sorry you spent time on that. :/

OT: Calling it, it's a poe. Nobody this dumb knows how to work the internet.

 

Regardless of the OP's intent and sincerity, there are people who think like that. Further, my goal isn't to try to reason with people who refuse to change their mind, but to present evidence to those sitting on the fence and try to convince them. The efficacy of that can be questionable, but, hey, even if it only affects one person, then I've at least done some good for the world, right?

 

I refuse to believe this. Call me Naive, but I refuse to believe that anyone could be that dumb. Or at least that dumb and still capable of operating technology.

You're me several months ago. Before I joined this forum. Before I lost my faith in humanity. You still have that gift. Cherish it. Run far away from this horrible, horrible place, leave it far behind. One's faith in humanity is not to be so easily thrown away.

...

 

Please post source other than Bible.

 

You'd be surprised.

Lulz, check the join date.

 

I'm a historian and it's always stunning to meet people who think our planet is 6000 years old. Jericho is one of the oldest (if not the oldest) settlements in the world, apparently nearly twice as old as our planet and the people living there for a couple thousand years never met the new settlers Adam and Eve, who rolled into town 6000 years ago.

I'm gonna skip the fossil-argument of your's since it's been adressed already.

 

Lets hope the OP doesn't get sick with one of the strains of bacteria that have EVOLVED to be antibiotic resistant.

 

lololololol

 

(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)! How do you do it? ;___;

 

Well, you've convinced me. Now maybe you can give me a reference for understanding how long 6,000 years is.

 

If God made the earth with age then it has to be older than 6000 years doesn't it?

 

Where is the bible stating how old the earth is ?
A planet can not be "without form" because gravity makes a celestial body with 400 or more kilometres of diameter spherical ( or something resembling a sphere) .
Damascus is continuously inhabited for like 9.000 years
Coccolithophores are organisms 5-100 micrometers big and they are responsible for the creation of chalk



yeah 6000 years !

 

Just a point to ponder but are there other chalk deposits similar to the Cliffs of Dover on other coastlines?

 

How can plant matter over millions of years turn into coal?

 

Oh wow, I missed this part. Someone doesn't understand how a forum works.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes. Chalk deposits are, while not exactly commonplace, not rare geologic formations.

 

Do you have an obsession with witches, goblins, spirits and imps?

 

This thread is now about prehistory and evolution.

So, anyone else find it amazing how we are able to make informed decisions about events that happened before life even existed on this planet? Science is (*)(*)(*)(*)ing awesome.

 

I have found this (Germany) after a quick google