"Snowfall Will Be a Thing of the Past"-2012 Warmists

And that is why conservatives, by definition, will die out.

 

Na, conservatives dont kill their offspring.

 

What?

Formulating "hypothesis" is speculatively theorizing.....proving the hypothesis through repeated experimentation that gleans identical results...or, the "scientific method"....is the only way to "do away" with the speculative theorizing.

 

A proven theory becomes SCIENTIFIC FACT, until disproven, as well, at least according to that anti-science buffoon Albert Einstein.

Point?

 

Oh, conservative global-warming nay-sayers always come-out in December and January when it's 10 degrees out side ... then disappear sometime in Mid-March when it's 90 degrees outside to November ..

Never fails.

 

False. This 'industry' that you speak of is only a few hundred years old. A large volcanic event can and will push more pollutants into the air in a moments time, well perhaps a few days, that being the case, man cannot nor will equal the destructive nature the planet can unleash on its own...

The biggest problem I will continue to have with the so-called climate or global warming 'science' is that it is so incomplete in the data used. Our reference points do not cover even 1% of global climate history, yet we know without a doubt that events have occurred such as ice ages, warming periods, and such have occurred without human input. When that can be sufficiently explained perhaps there is room to talk about man's part in the greater scope of global climate and the potential effects humanity could have on global climate.

 

Sorry, but there are NO VERIFIABLE THERMAL PROPERTIES in an atmospheric solution containing LESS THAN 400 PPM CO2...at least NOT FROM THE CO2, anyway.

 

The problem here though is atmoshpheric anomalies in ever increasingly destructive violence and more often ... as opposed say, to earth tectonics ... so rare, we build nuclear power plants on fault-areas ... and build civilizations near and on volcanos ..

This in of itself simply destroys any hypothesis or correlations about *earth cycles*

 

You should do something about this! You know your exhaling CO2 yes? You and your like minds should prove to us non believers by practicing what you preach, do something about it! Until than your merely hypocrites.

 

No, we educated understand the carbon cycle. We educated understand that the CO2 we exhale is a necessary part of life; not the problem. We educated understand that the carbon that has been sequestered for millions of years and is now being released by burning fossil fuels is the problem. We educated understand the carbon cycle; something you might want to understand so that your posts don't look so foolish.

 

You're questioning things. We're not supposed to do that. We're supposed to nod in fear and say, "Okay, we'll do whatever you say."

 

No! Forming an hypothesis is forming an hypothesis. In the scientific terms speculation is never used.
Proving an hypothesis can also be done with observations and evidence. Or do you think that the age of the universe was determined with experimentation? Or that the theory of evolution was "proven" by experimenting with species?

 

Did you hop in your time machine and measure giant volcano eruptions through out our landscape and different disaster periods in our earths history? lol.... If you look at the plant life that surrounded dinosaurs, it was much bigger then what we have today.... what feeds plants?

 

Ok, so you still can explain why the prediction of snowfall being a thing of the past, turned out to be wrong.

That's all you had to say.

 

Show me the "proof" of the Fact of Evolution. Or do you not accept evolution as fact?
Show me the "proof" of the fact that a thimbleful of a neutron star would weigh over 100 million tons. What experiments have been conducted on a thimbleful of a neutron star?

 

I thought someone had bumped an ancient thread when I first read the title

Robert Kennedy jr made a similar statement in the LA Times

weather patterns change, damifiknow why

 

Do either of those two examples request billions of dollars to combat along with penalties and regulations ???? Lol , no ... didnt think so.

 

Ever increasing anomalies? Compared to what? It is pure arrogance to think the limited data we possess is enough to blame humanity for anything relating to climate...

 

So does the doctor require my complete life's history to determine if I have a fever? Or can a doctor look at my current signs and symptoms and diagnose a fever?

 

No, you liberals will be eating each other in another 100 years.

 

Why do you keep bringing up analogies that don't work ? We have a tool, that goes in your mouth, and gives a factual read out of body temps....

 

Yeah and as we all know you can walk into any vegetarian and vegan restaurant and listen to people just agreeing with science all over the place. They are all in agreement with the science on nuclear power, GM food, fracking, vaccinations, western medicine, vegan diets, etc. etc. /sarcasm

This whole believing science line is old and worn out. Liberals wipe their ass with science when it doesn't fit their word view!!!

 

You have a point ... now, it's been hypothesized that life emerged from the ocean ... then at some point man emerged about 3 million years ago .... (australopithecus *Lucy*)

But from Earths' creation some 4 billion years ago (molten rock & iron followed by the snowball) ... emerged eras of *life* ...


Paleozoic Era (land distribution) ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleozoic

 

You have no news, the earth don't care, we will die out from one thing or another, and so it begins again. Like I said, you ain't gonna do (*)(*)(*)(*).