Most of you are left wing socialists... So I can expect the direction of your denials: How do you address: the CPUSA endorsed BHO as the first sitting POTUS.
The CPUSA is a joke, and long ago abandoned all revolutionary ideals. No self respecting revolutionary leftist would ever put their support behind the CPUSA.
There is not much editorial oversight in the CPUSA hierarchy. It's fledgling at best. A simple opinion piece on Obama makes it through and you assume the opinions of 1 writer have become the voice of the entire organization. He's not even a high level writer, I think. It would be idiotic of the CPUSA to endorse anybody but their own candidate. However... This is not your point... Your point is that Obama is so bad he's even endorsed by the CPUSA... Or, that the CPUSA endorsed Obama because he is so bad and it will pave the way for future social change. My point is that the CPUSA endorsed no such Obama, and that the rambling of 1 pigeon writer don't make a statement cohesive of the whole party. How many communist parties are there in the US? Unless they changed their name I think there are others. The CPA, etc. none of these parties have connections with original communists and mostly they are socialist, similar to naziist parties. Myself I believe people would suffer under any system and that success is determined by only a few human principles which can exist or not exist regardless of the system and will happen or not happen only according to the unique quality or absence of quality of the human beings in the power positions.
This matters about as much as it would if the KKK endorsed a Republican. What fringe elements endorse is mostly irrelevant. More than anything, they typically just do things to get attention.
It makes no difference. True communists were told by their KGB handlers many moons ago to infiltrate the mainstream parties. You're not going to get very far on the extreme end of the political spectrum. Better to work within it and chip away at it bit by bit.
