When your enemy uses informational warfare, don't "journalists" become a form of soldier and therefore fair game?
I'll go with 1) and 4) which is they were not peaceful protests, let's see the full footage of the protests.
So much for your "peaceful protests," Jackie Boy, the Israelis responded with non-lethal force, in the US throwing a rock is known under the law as throwing a deadly missile, now try throwing rocks at some cops in the US or the UK or any country on the planet and see what happens, you'll be lucky to get tazed, tear gassed, or pepper sprayed, you might get shot.
Maybe Israel should just take out the internet servers in the region, this would stop them from spreading the likely edited videos. 99% of the anti-Israel propaganda is a lie or severely distorted.
The posters themselves and their 'sources' - you can't trust a thing they say because 50% of them are just Neo-Nazis, and the other 50% are just rabid Palestinian or Arab nationalists who despise anything Israel and can't see beyond their fellow brown people
The term was ' degenerates ' and applies to all those who murder journalists and those who support such murders. - - - Updated - - - You calculate percentages by intuition ? I can't find the ' intuition ' button on my calculator.
No I know no one myself, do you? Bearing in mind how much teargas is used internationally to disperse stone-throwing, tyre-burning "peaceful" crowds, I hazard a guess that not too many people get killed by canisters. But please show otherwise. Well you have called infants and other family members of settlers fair game, so your hyprocracy is shining through! Yet you apparently find that button very effectively when you claim that neozionists are criminals and run the US (you have consistently failed to offer any evidence of same yet claim it as a fact).
That's the usual distortion in evidence. Still, you dug the hole so you fill it. Show your evidence . Nonsense. Still, another hole to fill. Show your evidence of my support for anything at all on the basis of claimed ' intuitional percentages . ' bye now.
The US of AIPAC is an unproven anti-semitic canard, used liberally and based on intuition. There are no facts supporting it, so what else could it be? Neozinoist, criminal, facist...derp derp
Ah, so you want to conveniently sideline any reference to percentages, the focus of the previous posts. The evidence is overwhelming. Start a thread and stand back. Don't try to derail this one. It concerns fascism's distaste for journalism which spotlights it.
I suggested that you started a thread. You don't appear to have any appetite for pages of evidence. NeoZionism doesn't much care for publicity.
Can you tell us the latest examples for all of these please? - - - Updated - - - People make their up their own statistics and numerical claims. It's rather common for this forum. You are right to call them out on it. As you will see, their supporters will defend this but no one will ever tell you a valid calculation or source for the numbers because they just make them up. 77.2% of all users on this forum do this.
Thanks for agreeing. I thought some never relied on intuition, especially in relation to neozionist manipulations of the world.