"Call the police" Yea, right.(The sinister twist of the Zimmerman case)

Yow. You don't even know yet Zimmerman didn't go tot he hospital?

Uh, ddude. You're here telling us you think Z went to the hospital, and you';re calling ME slow?

And you did it again. Wow. lol

^^^^ Is everyone watching? ^^^^

 

You are slow. My point wasnt that he went to the hospital. My point is it is documented. You are just a typical person who twists everything because you are trying so hard to make yourself look good but keep failing at it. I feel bad for the people in your life that have to deal with you.

 

Yeah. Try and weasel out of it now.

Too funny. What IS documented is that he was simply cleaned off with peroxide in a matter of a few minutes, and sent off without so much as a bandaid.

What is documented is that he refused THREE times to go to the hospital.

What is documented is that both the EMT AND Doctors report the next day say MINOR injuries.

What is documented is that the detective talking to him said the injuries "don't quite match up" to what he described, and that " a lot of people" also thought the same thing.

What is documented is that he DENIED even having a headache the next morning at the doctors office.

What is documented is that his blood pressure and vital signs literally MINUTES after killing a kid were NORMAL.

What is documented is that picture of him at the police station that night show little baby boo boos and all the Zimbots moaning to the contrary is not going to change that,

 

I dont think this dead horse can be beat any more.

 

Try to weasel out of it?? First of all i never claimed to know everything about the case. (example reading thousands of pages from it. HAHA what a joke) You do realize everything you just provided supports my point? This is all documentation that was provided NOT BY A HOSPITAL but by medical professionals. Thank you for proving my point!

 

[TABLE="class: outer_border, width: 500"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]

 

Well one of your fellow Z defenders made the claim. Are you saying it is not true? Are you say it is not relevant? Just curious because either one of those is not good for the Z defenders. If T didn't have the tool then y'all are lying. If it isn't relevant then Z profiled T and confronted someone and killed them with no proof of them being suspicious which is what Z said was his basis for calling 911.

 

Doesn't matter, if Treyvon assaulted him for any reason, it was self-defense.

Zimmerman's completely innocent, the facts are obvious. The only reason the left is harping on this story is because of their obsession with Treyvon being black, or their phobia of guns, or because Zimmerman had a "white sounding last name" - or a combination of the three. The left can't see past an outdated pic of Treyvon with a cute smile in a Hollister T-shirt - if he had looked more like Zimmerman, they wouldn't have given him the time of day - to the left it's just pure emotion and denial of the facts, and they're playing a dangerous game by gambling with George's freedom in their little game of "racist McCarthyism". If I could, I'd give Zimmerman a medal.

 

I have another question that I have not seen addressed. Where was Zimmerman keeping his gun, assuming Treyvon attacked him first and pinned him down beating him as some claimed?

Anyone want to field that question?

 

Correct; just what he did was.

 

Didnt have good insurance....thus he could not afford to pay the bill and since he felt no ill effects he decided not to go.

 

Nonsensical argument....First of all you do not understand The Florida Law on The justifiable use of Deadly Force in Self Defense.....Here it is >>>>>>1998 FLORIDA STATUTES
CHAPTER 776
JUSTIFIABLE USE OF DEADLY FORCE IN SELF DEFENSE

776.012 a person is justified in the use of deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony.
History.--s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1188, ch. 97-102.

Now you should be able to understand that in order to qualify under the Florida Law of Self Defense all George has to claim is he was in reasonable fear of his life.

What part of that do you do not understand....obviously your erroneous reasoning about george not receieving any serious injuries is irrelevant.

Also George was not given any drug tests.....Trayvon's dead ass body was tested and found to be positive for 2 different drugs....next case.

 

Time to close this thread...the liberals cannot understand The Florida Law on Self Defense....so how can they possibly have a clue as to anything else in regards to this thread....all they have is their pre-determined aka prejudiced opinions that Trayvon is innocent because he is black and George is guilty because he is not black. So obvious...no room here for intelligent debate. Close the thread.

 

That is the way most of these threads are. the Zimmerman haters are here for one reason: To spread propaganda and lies.

 

Said one of the head propaganda spreaders....

 

Congratulations. You just proved why TM was in his right to Stand his Ground.

....But we know he was drugged, by his own admission.

It's TWO drugs now! Wow. I'm sure you'll be providing back up of this. <heads up folks, you won't be seeing any back up, as that is a 'tawk outta the ass' post>

 

Not true. I post FACTS.

 

---What is pathetic is that so many people do not find it reasonable that Trayvon felt a need to defend himself. After all, the greatest mitigating factor in Zimmerman's case is doubt; the fact that we cannot be certain because only Zimmerman is alive to testify. We can only hear one side of the story, as far as what actually happened. There is evidence to support one theory or another but in the end, we can only be told what happened according to a person desirous of staying out of prison. I'm not inclined to believe Zimmerman's actions were malicious, and neither am I inclined to believe Martin's were. It was, as far as I a can tell, a stupid, reckless incident. It's absurd to posit the notion Zimmerman must be able to defend himself while simultaneously convincing yourself Martin was not in a position to do likewise, on the merits of what the surviving party testifies in order to escape incarceration.

 

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Now that's just ****ed.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Yeah, right. lol. Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not a fact.

Not by a long shot, bub.

 

Sure I will field it, it dont matter. Once you have a CCW you can keep it anywhere as long as its concealed.
And furthermore, in Florida. Open carry is legal. So the question is not germain to the case of who did what and what was the first illegal act.

 

yet you provide no proof to show none are facts....hahahaha! epic fail!

hoodies up! lolz!

 

You offered no proof they were facts.
See how that works?

 

you mean your cherry picking? sure i see.

 

The police and the local prosecutor who let George go without pressing charges are the same people that the Trayvestites claim he disobeyed by getting out of his SUV. If they really meant him to hide in his vehicle like an ostrich in sand, letting them handle everything, they certainly would have charged him with something. But they weren't upset at all about his actions. It was only when the White-haters started pushing for their self-appointed right to use this case to create fantasies of racial persecution and cold-blooded murder that any law-enforcing authorities decided that Zimmerman might have done something wrong.

 

So you're calling Chuck Norris a racist vigilante trigger-happy drug-addicted wannabe cop? Because if he'd do exactly what George Zimmerman did, that's what our socially conscious Trayvestites instruct us to call him.