Clintons Got This Heres Why By Myra Adams Aug 3, 2013 4:45 AM EDT Excerpts: By the standards of political time, where in one day a candidate can go from frontrunner to underdog, the 2016 presidential election is decades away. But from this vantage point, all signs point to Hillary Clinton coasting to the Democrat Party nomination and winning the White House. As a lifelong Republican, I am not pleased with my own prediction - nothing would thrill me more than if a conservative were to win back the presidency. But my political reality instincts lead me to believe the following. (And Ive been right before: in January 2011, I cowrote 12 Reasons Obama Wins in 2012.) Unless there is a radical change of circumstances within the Republican Party and its crop of presidential wannabes, or some unforeseen cataclysmic national event that dramatically alters the current economic and political landscape, or a serious deterioration in her health, Hillary has it locked up. 16 Reasons why: 1. Madame President: A Great Social Movement in the Making A great social movement to elect the first Madame President is gathering wind and will reach sustained hurricane strength on November 5, 2014 - the day after the midterm elections and the official start of the 2016 presidential campaign. read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/03/16-reasons-why-hillary-clinton-will-win-2016.html ...... IMO As Myra Adams is a republican and can still honestly predict the next presidential election, the foregoing article is strictly on point. Her resons for Hillary winning in 2016 include: The media, that it is Hillarys Time, Organization, the electoral college, vast amounts of money, she will not have any opposition, husband Bill will be a tremendous asse. Hillary will have the Hispanic, Black, and Latino votes, the republicans have avery weak bench with no star power. Also the long GOP primary will play to Hillarys advantage, Hillary will say that shd is the only leader that can bring us together, that the GOP have very weak arguments. and that they also have weak arguments against Hillary herself. What I previously thought would be a rollicking battle for the presidency is changed to a rather circumspect and more like a crowning of a queen than a campaign, but our Hillary deserves the presidency for her hard work, toughness in close fighting, and her vision of what is right for the majority still rings true especially in our world today. The only person I see to stand in Hillarys way would be Chris Christie, who seems to have learned alot of political lessons and can become real republican star power if he is coached well. His ideas are good, and has cleaned up his act tremendously; he just needs to learn the art of political subterfuge a little better.
Because the majority of voters have shown themselves to be less concerned with qualifications, and more concerned with the superficial. Skin color is done, now it's imperative we push gender and watch the lemmings line up. Has 0 to do with issues, qualifications or the Republican party. It's simply how far down our National Enquirer minded voter has fallen. Gender, that's it. The new "historic moment". It's no deeper than that, don't kid yourself.
Obscure liberal chatter sounds off as the primary reason for voting for Hillary to be "to get back at those Republicans". Come that election day the debt will be higher, the (true) unemployment rate will be higher, the number of persons receiving food stamps/welfare/etc will be higher, the crime rate will be higher, the threat to national security will be higher, and your rights - freedoms - personal privacy will be more diminished than they are now. Now that's not to say you can't entertain the notion of another 4 years of Democratic control, but in what twisted world does it make sense to vote with your emotions?
I dont know, she had all the same advantages in 2008 and could not even win the nomination let alone the presidency
And a Quinnipiac poll that came out today had Chris Christie edging Clinton as the hottest politician in America. http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institute...titute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1932
Hey Hillary, why did you launch nukes at London, Moscow, Beijing and Paris, starting WW3 and a nuclear holocaust? Hillary: "What difference does it make? Why do people keep asking me all these questions? Waaaaa!" At least if we if we elected Hillary, she would get additional layers of Secret Service protection, to protect her from all those Bosnian Snipers.
The only thing standing in Hillary's way, is Hillary's performance. As Benghazi shakes down, she will not be able to run. The State Dept armed the Libyans against the advice of the intelligence community, in a deal to buy back the arms, and Ghadaffi stockpiles, to ship some to Syria, and prevent what has happened now from happening. The CIA went in to clean up the mess they told her not to make, and it all blew up in her face. Then lie after lie... she is cooked. This was Hillaries gig. POTUS said "fix it" and went to bed. The State Department made no request for military assistance, and told the Tripoli team they could not go in. That came from Kennedy's office directly. She left people to die with no support to minimize the exposure of what was going on, and used the video as a cover for what happened. Fix it = cover it up evidently.
First of all, she nearly did. Second, she has one disadvantage that time has largely erased. The GOP in 2008, was the outgoing adminstration, and that colors perceptions of the candidates. GOP operatives from Karl Rove on down made it very clear that they were itching to run against Clinton. They were planning on spooling up all the nonsense they pulled in the 1990's again. We were getting ready to hear about Monica Lewinsky, fake Vince Foster conspiracy theories, the whole bit. And nobody wanted any part of it. Except Rush Limbaugh.
Too bad the Republican Base HATES Chris Christie and wants to nominate a Looney instead. (Fill in the name later. ) - - - Updated - - - TWENTY year old Hillary Hate....and El Fatsbo thinks because his audience of old white men still can get "up in a lather" about HRC, he can win an election on it. Or it's just part of Limbaugh's overall "issue" with women...that sees him lose a wife every 10 years.
As Hillary Clinton dodged the hail of bullets around her, she was more courageous than Tammy Wynette at a Lesbian political rally standing up for her man. She suddenly found herself among missing files that vanished for over 2 years and told everyone don't worry, I got this like I got a Whitewater profit. When things suddenly went wrong and the phone rang at 2:00 a.m. she said, "What difference does it make!?" The Liberal media has selected me and the people must accept all my previous massive failures. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton
No sorry, the VP slot is always undercard. We had old White man vs young Black man. It was a no contest. The proof is there, just google everything after the election and find an article or two that didnt remind us all in every one that we had the first African American president...the History making moment. Good luck, that was the story, and the Democrats are hoping to make lightning strike twice.
LOL...Rush outlived his usefulness already Gorn? Wasn't it you who just made a thread on him in the last week when he said something you liked?? Perhaps I'm mistaken if it wasn't you...but one of your usual cronies from the left made one, and I called them on it. Dont think i got a response. http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...our-monologue-admits-truth-benghazi-gate.html No, I wasn't mistaken...it was you. Credible enough to you then. now he's just a guy with an audience of old White men trying to get up in a lather...
Comical she supported Romney as the next Reagan for President. Geez I sure hope she supports Hillary, she's sure to lose.
[video=youtube;uI_SqqJIU14]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI_SqqJIU14[/video] She look a LOT looney to me.
Someone mentioned Benghazi. It will all but be forgotten a year from now. It never had legs to begin with. Sad for me to say, but I think there is a lot of truth in the OP. Clinton's have power and influence.
And Agent, do you see this reasoning as a positive? Do you see Hillary as a Queen to be crowned a good thing?
