Stinging From His Public Humiliation, Obama Threatens Iran

as this comment of yours reflects, you don't seem to be able to get anything right

what a joke, obama killed osama bin laden

[video=youtube;xlOIy6QEbes]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlOIy6QEbes[/video]

 

Well, Im finding it hard to understand who is obamas ally and who is obamas enemy. When you go down the list of obamas "accomplishments" the only one who continually loses is America.

 

and hes arming Al Queda......

Obama waives ban on arming terrorists
President Obama waived a provision of federal law designed to prevent the supply of arms to terrorist groups to clear the way for the U.S. to provide military assistance to "vetted" opposition groups fighting Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

Some elements of the Syrian opposition are associated with radical Islamic terrorist groups, including al Qaeda

When did Al Queda become Americas ally? WTF ?

 

Ya know, we never even saw a picture of Osama being dead. not even one single photo.....

How do we really know if we killed him at all?

Can you tell me how you can tell which one of obamas lies we're supposed to believe?

Is al queda our ally or enemy?

Why are we giving them weapons?

WTF is going on?

 

of course you're confused

you understand that dinosaurs died out over 65 million years ago and noah's ark was a parable, right?

again with the confusion, most americans won in 2008 & 2012, like obama did

idiots like dick morris, rush limbaugh, mitt romney and their followers are the ones that lost

[video=youtube;1P5CSgJyxu4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1P5CSgJyxu4[/video]

the ones that needed to see them, saw them

osama's dead and gone

 

Do you realize the patriot act is based on our war on terror, and state sponsors of terror?

America is now a state sponsor of terror.

Does that mean America is now at war with ourselves?

 

they're almost there


Forensic Details in U.N. Report Point to Assad’s Use of Gas

A United Nations report released on Monday confirmed that a deadly chemical arms attack caused a mass killing in Syria last month and for the first time provided extensive forensic details of the weapons used, which strongly implicated the Syrian government.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/world/europe/syria-united-nations.html

i realize that nut cases often spout off all kinds of looney stuff

alex jones is the perfect example of that sort of behavior

and they also like to stack stupid questions up high

 

Since theyre so stupid, youll have no problems answering them......


Oliver North Questioned about Iran Reveals Concentration Camps!!!

 

get a grip on reality

i watched all that 26 years ago

what's your point?

 

I really thought youd be able to understand....

well, when the lies of the CIA come to light, its never pretty.....

kinda like obama telling us the NSA is protecting us from Al Queda, while hes actually funding and arming Al Queda, will not end well for America, nor obama....

My grandma always used to tell me, If you put yourself in a position where you have to lie to avoid getting in trouble, youre (*)(*)(*)(*)ing up....

Have you ever seen a liar lie, like obama? I havent.

 

i do

you're talking about an ultra-right, war hawk president's administration

obama isn't that

it is protecting us

 

then why is he doing the exact same thing?

Youre not dumb enough to believe we didnt arm the terrorists in lybia

Youre not dumb enough to believe obama hasnt been arming terrorists since well before the Benghazi attack

the NSA cant protect us when our president is giving guns and bombs to terrorists.

there is no longer any excuse for the patriot act, none what so ever, and no one can claim that there is.

 

That is an outright lie.

There is nothing in the UN report that implicates anyone.

Ban Ki Moon refused to even comment on any suggestion of responsibility.

 

he isn't

you just don't know what you're talking about

this was obviously not something rebels had the capability to pull off

assad, on the other hand, has the hardware


In two chilling pieces of information, the inspectors said that the remnants of a warhead they had found showed its capacity of sarin to be about 56 liters — far higher than initially thought. They also said that falling temperatures at the time of the attack ensured that the poison gas, heavier than air, would hug the ground, penetrating lower levels of buildings “where many people were seeking shelter.”

The investigators were unable to examine all of the munitions used, but they were able to find and measure several rockets or their components. Using standard field techniques for ordnance identification and crater analysis, they established that at least two types of rockets had been used, including an M14 artillery rocket bearing Cyrillic markings and a 330-millimeter rocket of unidentified provenance.

These findings, though not presented as evidence of responsibility, were likely to strengthen the argument of those who claim that the Syrian government bears the blame, because the weapons in question had not been previously documented or reported to be in possession of the insurgency.

Moreover, those weapons are fired by large, conspicuous launchers. For rebels to have carried out the attack, they would have had to organize an operation with weapons they are not known to have and of considerable scale, sophistication and secrecy — moving the launchers undetected into position in areas under strong government influence or control, keeping them in place unmolested for a sustained attack that would have generated extensive light and noise, and then successfully withdrawing them — all without being detected in any way.

One annex to the report also identified azimuths, or angular measurements, from where rockets had struck, back to their points of origin. When plotted and marked independently on maps by analysts from Human Rights Watch and by The New York Times, the United Nations data from two widely scattered impact sites pointed directly to a Syrian military complex.

Other nonproliferation experts said the United Nations report was damning in its implicit incrimination of Mr. Assad’s side in the conflict, not only in the weaponry fragments but also in the azimuth data that indicated the attack’s origins. An analysis of the report posted online by the Arms Control Association, a Washington-based advocacy group, said “the additional details and the perceived objectivity of the inspectors buttress the assignment of blame to Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian government.”

The United States and its allies seized on the volume of data in the report to reaffirm their conclusion that only Syrian government forces had the ability to carry out such a strike, calling it a validation of their own long-held assertions.

Both the British and American ambassadors to the United Nations also told reporters that the report’s lead author, Dr. Ake Sellstrom, a Swedish scientist who joined Mr. Ban in the Security Council briefing, had told members that quality of the sarin used in the attack was high.

“This was no cottage-industry use of chemical weapons,” said Britain’s ambassador, Sir Mark Lyall Grant. He said the type of munitions and trajectories had confirmed, “in our view, that there is no remaining doubt that it was the regime that used chemical weapons.”

Samantha Power, the American ambassador, acknowledged implicitly the credibility issue that has confronted the United States on Syria chemical weapons use, a legacy of the flawed intelligence on weapons of mass destruction that led the United States into the Iraq war a decade ago.

“We understand some countries did not accept on faith that the samples of blood and hair that the United States received from people affected by the Aug. 21 attack contained sarin,” she said. “But now Dr. Sellstrom’s samples show the same thing. And it’s very important to note that the regime possesses sarin, and we have no evidence that the opposition posses sarin.”

Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly I. Churkin, said there were still too many unanswered questions. In talking to reporters, he asked, if the Syrian forces had indeed been responsible and sought to attack insurgents, “how is it possible to fire projectiles at your opponent and miss them all?”

“We need not jump to any conclusions,” he said.

The report’s release punctuated a tumultuous week spawned by the global outrage over the attack, in which an American threat of punitive force on the Syrian government was delayed as Russia proposed a diplomatic alternative and intense negotiations between the United States and Russia led to a sweeping agreement under which Syria’s chemical weapons arsenal could be destroyed.

The United Nations, in danger of becoming irrelevant in helping to end the Syria conflict, was suddenly thrust back into a central role, with the Security Council now engaged in deliberations over an enforceable measure to hold Syria to its commitment on chemical weapons.

Secretary of State John Kerry and the foreign ministers of France and Britain said Monday that they would not tolerate delays in dismantling Syria’s chemical weapons.

“It is extremely important that there are no evasions,” William Hague, the British foreign secretary, said at a news conference with Mr. Kerry in Paris.

Mr. Kerry said, “If Assad fails in time to abide by the terms of this framework, make no mistake, we are all agreed — and that includes Russia — that there will be consequences.”

The release of the report came as a separate panel of investigators from the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva said they were investigating 14 episodes of suspected chemical weapons use.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/world/europe/syria-united-nations.html?_r=0

 

The investigators were unable to examine all of the munitions used, but they were able to find and measure several rockets or their components. Using standard field techniques for ordnance identification and crater analysis, they established that at least two types of rockets had been used, including an M14 artillery rocket bearing Cyrillic markings and a 330-millimeter rocket of unidentified provenance.

[video=youtube;2PQcpX_aBrs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PQcpX_aBrs[/video]

330 mm is about 13 inches..... That pretty much looks like whats in the video to me....

 

Well done...a completely uniformed opinion piece formed on a deliberate misconception.

Don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.

Extreme right! Go ahead and label any and all criticisms...its a perfect way to remain in what Herbert Spencer called "everlasting ignorance".

 

what a joke, do you even know what cyrillic means?

 

Yeah its a language from central west asia.

i cant read the markings in the video., though

 

just like i thought, you don't realize it's russian

you know, like in assad's russian allies

 

I hate to break it too you, but virtually everyone in asia uses old russian equipment. China, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Syria, turkey, ukraine, poland, Afghanistan, Libya, Al Queda, freakn everybody.

 

that doesn't change the fact that assad got his hardware from russia

you can keep pretending assad didn't use the weapons, but evidence makes it clear

 

Besides your bloodthirsty President.

 

I dont see any evidence. None what so ever.

 

like that matters

no, it's about preventing blood from flowing and death

The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons and their precursors."]The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons and their precursors.