South Carolina houses passes bill that would make Obamacare implementation a crime

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/2/south-carolina-house-passes-bill-making-obamacare-/

Okay here is the obvious question even though it's kind of obvious this bill is extremely stupid; is it even constitutional?

 

states rights law does suppose to counter the supreme court video time 1:05 Thomas Jefferson said the supreme court was just supposed to be advisers
[video=youtube;x7Daahlleo4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7Daahlleo4[/video]

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/us/supreme-court-lets-health-law-largely-stand.html?_r=0

Supreme Court Upholds Health Care Law, 5-4, in Victory for Obama

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld President Obama’s health care overhaul law, saying its requirement that most Americans obtain insurance or pay a penalty was authorized by Congress’s power to levy taxes. The vote was 5 to 4, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joining the court’s four more liberal members.

 

Obama should do what Lincoln & Eisenhower did and send in the troops and lock those idiots up.

 

States aren't required to set up the exchanges and roughly half the states have opted out of setting them up. You still have to pay the fine..........I mean "tax" though if you don't get coverage through the federal exchange.

I forgot exactly what it was about but Oklahoma has a case that supposedly is going to the SCOTUS I think about penalties or something. I will have to look that up later.

Edit: It has to do with susidies in the 34 states that opted out of state exchanges. http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/08/21/the-biggest-obamacare-news-getting-little-attentio/

 

but didnt Thomas Jefferson warn us about the supreme courts power back then
http://myloc.gov/Exhibitions/creati...nThinksSupremeCourtsControlMustBeLimited.aspx
and shouldn't of got involved with obama care in the first place

 

Let's solve this problem once and for all. Let's kick those idiots out of the country and they can revert to swamp dwellers. They can't cope living in modern America so let's kick them out.

 

No, it's not.

The last time South Carolina tried this, they started a war.

 

Headline is misinformation. "Houses" plural did not pass this, only the South Carolina House (singular). It will die in the South Carolina Senate, like it did the last time the House passed a bill like this, back in May.

 

I absolutely agree.

 

I don't think our Founding Fathers intended the SCOTUS to be advisory. If they had, they wouldn't have given SCOTUS a third of the power. Jefferson spoke mostly about his view that appointing justices for life was a mistake because that would give SCOTUS an opportunity to gain more power over the other two branches. I've never read anything from Jefferson that stated he thought SCOTUS should be a mere advisory role in government. If you know of any document Jefferson wrote stating SCOTUS should be an advisory role, I would sure love to see it.

 

Not so long as the Supremacy Clause exists and the ACA continues to be upheld by the USSC.

 

I like this bill on two different levels, viz.:

(1) I consider ObamaCare an abomination (or, as some have put it, an Obamanation).

(2) I stand foursquare in favor of states' rights, and the attendant doctrine of nullification.

As for the question of whether this is constitutional, this is a tacit reference (presumably) to the so-called "Supremacy Clause" of the US Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2).

But since the left does not seem to revere the Tenth Amendment (which greatly limits the powers of the federal government), I see no reason to fetishize the Supremacy Clause...

 

What a shame.. SC has one of the highest rates for blindness and amputations from diabetes in the nation.

 

Oh well. Ubama knows if he even tried he would end up with a civil war. And since hes a coward he just hid like he always does.

 

The short answer is no. But like states who are either not enforcing federal anti marijuana laws, or recognizing federal pro gay marriage laws, it comes down to if the DOJ will enforce the law through federal court. In this case I would have to say they will.

 

No, it isn't constitutional

 

There is no such thing as nullification.............

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_(U.S._Constitution)

 

Good grief, these people have become ideological apostates.

 

Absolutely. Let's get this party started.

 

The above observation strikes me as downright bizarre.

One might (theoretically) argue in favor of the federalist ideal, and against the doctrine of nullification; but to assert that there is simply "no such thing" as nullification is...well, really strange.

Oh, and as for the Wikipedia reference to an 1809 situation, I have long advocated that the several states should totally ignore all pontifications from the federal courts; and that each state should view its own state supreme court as the highest authority in the land for its own state, and then act accordingly, regardless of the potential upshot...

 

Your agreement with the same conditions as Dred Scott is duly noted, though that decision had an even larger majority.

 

The last time the Palmetto boys caused trouble they got their butts handed to them. This time if any survive they'll end up in concentration camps.

 

The government nuked Mississippi twice, on purpose.

 

I know that's a picture of the 101st Airborne in Little Rock, 1957, but I can't find it. Do you remember the link?