BREAKING: Emails Show Lerner Fed Tax Information to Democrat Elijah Cummings

Sure she would. She like her lawyer and the rest of the country know this is a setup at her expense. It is "HUMANLY IMPOSSIBLE" for her to have done something wrong, because the law itself was already tainted. Therefore, there is nothing she can be wronged for. It's just simple logic. It's amazing to me how people like you do not understand something that is so simple to understand.

It is the only talking point needed, because it is the only one that makes sense. How do I know that? Because people such as yourself have no way of arguing it down. It is what it is.

You say we have been through this before. Yes, and we will continue, because that is as far as that talking point can go. If it had gone any further, Issa would have already invented a talking point to take it further. Guess what? He can't. At this point, he can only invent lies. And we all know he's great at that.

 

Well the "people" like you must wonder why she needs immunity if she could not have done anything wrong

Sorry you cant spin this god knows you have tried though! Kudos for being stubborn i guess.

 

you still trying out the line of crap about the law its doesn't make a dam how the law is written if it is right or wrong. it was only applied to one side. cant you understand that simple concept

If a state writes an unconstitutional law like its a crime to assemble and then they only ones that get arrested for assembling and breaking the law are Blacks. would you blame the law for its blatant discriminatory enforcement of the law or would you blame the ones enforcing said law

Unless you can show us that the law was written in such away that forced the IRS to only target conservative groups your lame argument that it is the laws fault has not one once of relevance or creditability

 

And again I will ask show us how this so called bad law was written that forced the IRS to only target conservative groups?
if you cant give us that proof you have nothing

Bad law illegal law unconstitutional law doesn't make a dam when it is only applied to conservatives
The argument isn't if the law was applied or not the argument is it was only applied to one political affiliation

 

not any more. In case you haven't noticed, obama has become emboldened. he has been re-elected and frankly, he doesn't give a leap and will do whatever he wishes

 

Cummings is in trouble - he is exposed for what he is - a tool for Barack. That's what they do, they hide the truth, and then attack the messengers for presenting the evidence.

 

75k in an election is fishy? Want to hear what Obamas groups bring in to the lap the poor? (No just kidding it goes to wealthy lobbyists)

 

Dude, go back and look at the title of the thread..........BREAKING: Emails Show Lerner Fed Tax Information to Democrat Elijah Cummings, what in the blue hell does that have to do with Cheney?

 

They are getting lazier with deflections these days.

 

Well, surprise surprise. So.....the Minority Chair of this Committee, Ole Cummings himself, was in on it, eh? No wonder they had such a hard time getting to the bottom of it. He has ZERO integrity and should be brought upon charges.

 

I think we're starting to see why Mr Cummings was so vocal with Issa lol....He wants to discredit this investigation to make sure he isn't brought down with it.

 

I think it's either or doing the talking there.

 

I want what he's having!

 

Probably the latter. Not enough weed in the world to make sense of most of those posts. Eh I got to get to a regular computer at some time.

Cummings really made a fool of himself.

- - - Updated - - -

If found to be true, that is really ballsy isn't it? That email seems damning.

- - - Updated - - -

They should give government officials that use government to attack their enemies 20-life. Christie's aide too.

 

Sure is on both counts! I think Lerner thought taking the 5th would make it all go away. She looked so smug while doing it. Definitely going to be interesting as this one continues to play out.

 

Clearly, this is all GWB's fault.

 

prison is too good for them. they should be hung up by their ykw and horsewhipped to death on public tv.

 

Her going for immunity makes perfect sense, and I just explained to you why. It is you who are ignoring my talking points. You can only make the point of "asking why" she goes for immunity, never addressing my explanation I just explained to you, because you know the sense I make cannot be countered with any sense of your own, to refute my explanation. If there was a spin, you would have pointed out the spin with your own explanation, and you did not.

If you want to stay on point with this debate, you will have to produce something counter to my argument.

- - - Updated - - -

What evidence?

 

That's no explanation. That's only an opinion of yours. You have no information substantiating that claim. It's all talk.

 

In fairness to him I think he probably meant to comment in another thread. I've done this myself by accident a few times.

 

http://www.humanevents.com/2014/04/07/house-gop-report-the-irs-did-not-target-progressive-groups/

 

You asked and I told you. Don't ask if you can't handle the truth.

 

Lol! "Doesn't make a damn how the law is written". Lol! If I run a red light and the law says I'm supposed to stop at the red light but do not, does it matter? Lol! Man you have to be kidding me. Dude, let me explain something to you since you are just coming out of the stone age. The law in this case means everything. Please try and keep up.

Evidence revealed targeting was applied to both sides.

Lol again! Your question does not apply in this case. Totally unrelated to this case.

Again, evidence is there that both were targeted.

 

Heck, here's even more recent breaking news. You recall that (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) of a representative who made Issa apologize to him a week or two ago for having been mildly rude during the end of a session with Learner? It turns out that he was INVOLVED in part of this scandal as well:

 

you are kidding right? He is in a Democrat district and pulls 75% of the votes at least. The majority of residents in that district depend on taxpayer dollars for their employment. Do you really think they aren't going to keep voting for a loyal Democrat? Who wants to cut off a perfectly good working arm or leg? It doesn't matter that he's corrupt and a piece of trash. He is a Democrat so that's to be expected. His job is to keep the largesse coming and he delivers.