BREAKING: New witness conversation captured on audio describes Brown charging cops

Well. Well. Look what we have here.

There is a new eye witness account from a witness that saw the whole Ferguson shooting happen and he is caught on tape soon after the incident telling another person what transpired in the Mike Brown shooting.

According to this witness, Mike Brown did not have his hands up and was charging the cops.

This corroborates Officer Darren Wilson's statement.

This changes everything.

 

How did that protester chant go? "Hands up, don't shoot!"

 

Ooops! Looks like the Left just got busted with a falsely ginned up race war on their hands -- again. Every time a new bit of information surfaces it makes this look just like what it was, a case of massive emotions manipulations and deliberate race-agitation practices on the Left and all in order to falsely sustain the Left's favorite meme of 'All White cops are inherent racists who LIVE for killing Black CHILDREN for no damn reason aside from race-based hatred.' Can you say "Busted!" leftwingers? Better learn how, because your side just got busted again deliberately making something racist in nature when it never was.

 

One source and if I was to take a page from many of you Americans, a source that is totally biased, trumps the multiple witnesses that contradict this witness. Totally legit.

 

I really wonder what the looters of Fakerson will do after an acquittal or a lack of charges being brought at all.

Actually I think we all know what they're going to do...

 

If was charging the police officer when he was shot, then the bullet wounds would be from the front and not the back. The autopsy will bring this out if true.

- - - Updated - - -

Why, they'll return everything to the stores. What did you think they'd do?

 

Desperation at it's finest.

 

If one shot came from behind then it pre meditated murder, the Cop is in big trouble , there are eye witnesses saying he had his hand up more than a few.

 

And they can testify under oath and be cross examined.

 

interesting - we have conflicting testimony

 

No, there is ONE eyewitness saying that (the lying co-suspect) with others repeating what he said as gospel and with the MSM intimating that they are corroborating eye-witnesses.

 

And modern day crimes scene investigation and forensics can tell if a person had their hands up while getting shot or had their hands down while getting shot or hand their hands moving during a running stride while getting shot.

 

You mean to tell me that the well respected police officer with a clean record was telling the truth and the criminal looting thug was lying? I'm stunned. No words.

 

If you want to watch a video with this exchange in the audio of it, go here:

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/168...tail-background-video-mins-ferguson-shooting/

If this is true and all bullet entries are in the front of his body; I don't see how the copy gets prosecuted. It's time for the autopsy. The fact that the family is now doing a second private autopsy, tells me the first one exonerated the police.

 

LOL! Well...the report just came out that all shots were from the FRONT! DOH! Looking more and more like this dude caused his own death....

 

The autopsy proves that the cop was in the right. The "wittnesses" including his friend who was with him at the time of the robber are bald face liars!!!!

Again the actual fact trump all the lies!!!!!! The guy in fact caused his own death by not obeying the police.

 

This changes nothing really. Had Brown been shot once or twice, then yes, it would change everything. Had Brown been shot only once in the head, it would change everything. But Brown was shot twice in the head and 4 times in the right arm. That is excessive use of deadly force. There is no spin that will change that fact.

 

No, this is not true in anyway. The difference between 2 shots and 6 is about 1 second. Unless you think humans are robots , its not that " excessive" in any way. You are taught to shoot till the target stops moving.

 

Brown had a clean record as well, so what's your point? He wasn't even being confronted as a suspect in the store robbery. Shooting someone 6 times, 4 in the arm and 2 in the head, is excessing use of deadly force.

 

The reason the second autopsy was done is because the first one failed to mention how many times Brown was shot. That is critical information that had to be determined. Now we know Brown was shot in the head twice, it's more likely the cop will be prosecuted.

 

Did Brown Know he just robbed a convenient store. ?

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/u...-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0

No wounds from the back. Sorry.

 

You guys just keep making wild assumptions. It's weird to witness the Liberal mind at work.

 

By who's definition is this excessive? Was the officer trained to unload his weapon? Did the officer try to "wing" him first with 4 shots to the arm?

You are making up a ton of crap with nothing to support your position.

I will side with, WE DO NOT KNOW... more information required.

 

I've been waiting for that autopsy evidence to come out since this happened.

This does not look good for blacks, unfortunately this is going to foment more people to agree with the far right saying blacks are violent and unruly.

Sadly it's the Al Sharptons of the world who immediately believe any story they hear and spread it like wild fire. The fact that people would completely believe some of these stories from a guy that just robbed a store is unreal.

Now more racism will come, *sigh*