Michael Brown Shot 6 Times - All From the Front

are you paid to post or something? i wonder if some of you leftists are paid to do what you do.

only way i can explain a person so oblivious yet so determined.

 

Jonathan Gentry Ferguson Missouri ​

[video=youtube;B092acMImJE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B092acMImJE[/video]​

Democrat Liberal Socialists Listen carefully.

 

you still can't get anything right

 

Yes, focus entirely on the party. Don't focus on anything else, because if you did, you might learn the truth. A party can't be racist. A certain ideology on the other hand, can lead to racism, which has a lot to do with fear of change.

 

and those old racist democrats are either dead or republicans now

 

Most of those southern Democrats are probably dead, but their ideology (conservatism) still lives on, and currently today infects the Republican party. But the GOP brought it on themselves, so they have no one else to blame.

 

I just called my uncle in law who is a world class legend of law enforcement he called your cousin a liar.

Police do often call for back uo and they should. However they do not simply call, wait and hope for the best when a violent action is IN PROGRESS. Especially if that violetn act is directed AT THEM. Calling for back up and waiting would be acceptable and common if a police officer feels a violent act MIGHT occur but has not yet.

If this grandiose cousin is not a figment of your imagination ( most likely ) you should ask him more specifics

 

good for him, maybe he'll get the opportunity to ruin his and lots of other people's lives over nothing, like wilson did

instead of being smart and acting like he has a functioning brain in his head, like my cousin

jaywalking isn't a violent action

 

Your claim that it was nothing assumes WIlson was lying which you have no evidence of.

On the other hand you ignore at least SOME details of his story have been corroborated ( you always ignore that fact ) .

Attacking a cop and attempting to touch his weapon is a violent which you assume never happened. ( you keep making that assumption as well ).

Now of course you will spin again and make another false claim

 

Every situation is different. If I saw someone who fit the description for a robbery they are being stopped, period. That is kind of our job... you know, to investigate crimes. But you knew that already, because your uncle has been a cop for 200 years..?

 

No it is not, but chances are Brown thought he was being stopped for the robbery he had just committed shortly before. People fight us for a lot less than a robbery charge.

 

brown was jaywalking, in comparison to all the violence and damage done, it was nothing

brown wasn't stopped for suspicion of robbery

the fight could have been easily avoided and brown could have been arrested for stealing cigars, later

 

Jaywalking is still against the law, the officer stopped him to conduct an investigation (I.E. running a background check, checking for warrants etc...). At that point Brown was being detained. By law, we can detain you for a reasonable amount of time while conducting the investigation and deciding to issue a summons or take you into custody if you have a warrant.

Since it is illegal to fight the police, I think it is safe to say that this could have easily been avoided if Brown had just followed the law.

See how easy that was.

 

There are a lot of mistruths found in your post.

 

which ended up causing a homicide, riots, looting and untold damage

considering how badly the st louis police force has been performing

i think it's safe to say that lots of people in that town don't have much respect for the law

 

I wasn't focusing on the party. You claimed "Who woulda thunk they were all conservative, err, I mean "white people""? I just happened to indicate main figures that were true the bigots and racists that were against integration. If they happened to be Democrats so be it. It just so happens you're the one that claimed "Conservatives" were the racists. Since when were Democrats ever conservative? Turns out it hasn't changed. Democrats in power have made sure the black people remain on the plantation by little or no employment, breaking up families, keeping them in ghettos and continually banging that racist drum.

 

See how fast and easy you ignore that the strong arm robbery is not the same as an officer involved shooting. You might as well have used a report on a stolen bicycle as your reference for as much relevance that one has with the other.

 

Another point is the fact that Brown KNEW he just committed strong arm robbery at a convenience store and officer Wilson didn't.

 

I never said the use of deadly force wasn't needed. That is something we do not know yet. What I said was, Wilson used excessive deadly force. 2 gunshot hits to the head is clearly excessive. It's frankly over kill. We also don't know how many shots the officer fired, which could have endangered innocent bystanders.
You're jumping the gun on claiming Brown fulfilled all 4 criteria. We don't know what happened. We just know what the police say about the incident. We also know that these shots were fired at a distance from Brown, which means the officer wasn't in immediate danger at the time he shot Brown. The officer could have used a taser on Brown if Brown was charging the officer. I'm not convinced deadly force was necessary.

 

How do you know? Were you there? The witnesses were, and I will go with what they say.

 

A responsible police officer pays attention to where he is shooting his fire arm. Public safety should have been the officers first concern. Brown was unarmed. The police officer should have used his taser. Brown was at a considerable distance from the officer. Police officers shouldn't be trying to kill an unarmed person. Shooting a person until they are dead is an action that should only be taken if the other person is fire back.

 

Now your suggesting police shouldn't apprehend anyone under any circumstances? Or should he have just shot the guy outright? Your not making any sense.

 

Show proof Wilson even had a taser.

 

Yes you edited your post after i asked. Edits and posts are timestamped so you fool no one.

 

It's probably the way we interpret the data. They said there was a struggle. So now we have a 6'4" 280? "gentile giant" *sic* who already stole and assaulted a store owner just got into a struggle for, presumably, his gun. Perp turned and ran away only to stop, reverse course, and advance on the officer not stopping when shot.

Now...from that information, which is free if media's leading questions, editorialized gloss mag tactics, and well, emotion...how is it you see a murderer in the police officer?