`Gentle giant? Try gang member and murder suspect`

You know, typing in all caps is often a sign of high intelligence...

Anyway....again, just because someone is a criminal doesn't mean they deserve to be summarily executed in the street by a police officer. But I digress, let's try to keep the discussion about this laughably transparent OP.

 

This has the appearance of the usual disinformation attempts by the forces of darkness in the police.

 

As an adult, not as a teenage minor.

 

Yes, it does.

It actually goes way back. Twitter feed is a new twist on the old trick.

Right wing media rushed to repeat and rant about the "orbital blowout eye socket" injury that was manufactured out of whole cloth by a right wing blog. They rushed to circulate and repeat the supposed eyewitness account of an anonymous caller to a right wing talk radio show.

It went all the way to Fox Noise and the talk radio screamers.

No one vetted either story. Nobody checked or verified. They all just repeated it, and cited one another as confirmation in a circle jerk that is familiar to anyone who watches the antics of the right wing noise machine.

Neither story was true, and this one isn't either.

I have no doubt that the lawsuit part is. Anyone can file a frivilous lawsuit. In fact, the GOP used frivilous lawsuits as a tactic to circulate baseless stories about alleged voter fraud and ACORN in right wing media just before elections in 2006 and 2008. The suits disappeared right after the election.

This one will too. The only reason it was even filed was so that a conservative operative could talk about it on Twitter as a way of recycling previously debunked claims and having them picked up and megaphoned once more throughout the right wing echo chamber.

Right wing media has used tactics like this for years, as you have pointed out.

They used it very effectively in conjunction with the Bush adminstration to push the most lurid WMD claims before the Iraq war. One of their favorites was a charge that Sadaam Hussien had a secret terrorist training camp at a place called Salman Pak, that trained terrorists on how to hijack airplanes.

That story was fiction. It was manufactured by Ahmed Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress, the same people who brough us "Curveball".

The story was recycled at least four different times through the right wing noise machine, each time as "BREAKING NEWS"

(BTW, Chalabi is at it again. His operatives are adding fuel to the already lurid reporting on ISIS. His group manufactured the claim that ISIS got $470 million in cash in a bank in Mosel). This is not to say that ISIS is benign. But, as was the case a decade ago, one should be VERY careful about walking the material back and knowing who the sources are.

 

But you want to investigate every nugget of Darren Wilson's life. Isn't that so? Let the lynching of Wilson begin while hiding the real Michael Brown Crips gangsta. Why would Darian Johnson lie?

 

For the last time. Brown could not have been a Crip. That neighborhood is strictly Blood territory. For crying out loud, get your facts straight.

 

The definition of insanity is to ignore the past

 

The truth is coming out and the leftists are going nuts trying to disprove it.

 

You mean dismissed don't you? If there IS a juvenile record it would be denied and only unsealed at Wilson's trial if there is one. If there is NO juvenile record the lawsuit to unseal it would be dismisses as there is nothing to unseal. It's being denied on this forum a juvenile record even exists. So please post a link any lawsuit to unseal Brown's juvenile record being denied.

 

Yet another poster that tries the talking point of blaming "right wing media" for things like the Orbital bone and Josie when CNN discussed BOTH.

The rest of your post is utter desperation it is nothing but an offtopic rant. WRU mods???

Btw

"It also has grabbed millions robbing banks including an Iraqi central bank in Mosul."

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/25/world/meast/isis-5-questions/


If anyone should be ranting about misinformation it should be this forum and directed at you.

 

What are you talking about?

So if the police had covered the body of Baby Brown the cominuty would not have protested that the body had been hiden??

What ignorance. R Parks volunteered to be arrested because the rich women were tired of their maids arriving to work smelling like Black men in the back of the bus smelled in those days.

So you think that 80% of the rioters and the looters being from out of town tells you that they had a genuine complaint rather than just being criminals that ent there to get a car load of whatever they could grab??

I have seen a lot of bodies laying uncovered. In one case where the body was covered critical evidence was lost or contaminated. If the cops had a body blanket in their car to cover shooting victims the drugs on the body could have come from the blanket. Power burn patterns could be lost if the officer covered the body before the investigation started. Use your head and think if there is a rational reason for protesting the shooting of a giant violent punk with a criminal history.

 

Yeah...a black person, which you ask for. You said nothing about law abiding in your original post.

And quite frankly people are getting sick of the "poor me...whiteys out to get me" mentality that people like you have. I know I am!

It was a stupid question to begin with...show me 1 law abiding citizen of any color that demands the police let a person of any color commit a crime.

Who gives a damn if Michael Brown has a juvenile record or not, the photos from the robbery demonstrate quite clearly that he was not the choir boy you and others seem to think he was.

 

And? Are you telling me that there wouldn't be any newspaper articles about him being arrested while he was a minor?

 

Superbad has that mentality? I would like to see proof of that. It's against the forum rules to smear a specific poster like that without evidence.

 

The media can't release the minor's name. So there will be no story found without the juvy records.

 

What proof???

 

Even with a conviction?

 

Then let them ban me. I'm tired of banging my head against the wall anyway.

I'm sick of people blaming racism every time something like this happens, some people act like it never happens to anyone but blacks and they are wrong, you just never hear about it. I saw a white congressman accused of being racist because he said Obama was lying, I did not know that was a racist term.

You have people on here and other forums claiming that he was shot in back, when that is proven false then they claim that an autopsy is wrong and offer their own theory of what went down, when that doesn't gain traction then they claim he was being cooperative, when it is pointed out the officer was injured then they claim he or a fellow officer did it to add credibility to his story, when he does not appear in public, despite numerous calls for his death, they are hiding something, when photos are presented of Brown committing strong armed robbery they either claim it should be overlooked because of the value of the items or outright deny that it was him.

I had one poster tell me they were standing in the middle of the street waiting to cross because it was so busy, despite the fact the "star" witness said they walking down the middle of it.

And in spite of what little evidence is available, anything that disputes the officer walking up to him on his knees with his hands above his head pleading for his life and emptying the clip is unacceptable.

Do you think that if his juvenile records were released and they revealed he was a serial killer it would change these peoples minds? I don't, because all that matters to them is the race of the people involved.

Do you think if the cop was black or the perp was white you would have ever heard of it?

Then you are called a racist if you are not part of the lynch mob...the (*)(*)(*)(*) is getting old!

 

Doesnt understand tampering with evidence i guess. Or doesnt want to admit it.....

 

Sorry, but since the headline on this thread is a questionable claim based soley on rumor, it is fair game to discuss how these blame the victim rumors get spread and where they come from.

I realize that a lot of posters don't seem to care if what they are debating is based on bogus claim, as long as they can rant. That's what the people who make this stuff up and spread it want. Outrage is good for ratings.

I noted that mainstream media picked up on some of this nonsense, and still does. But it orgininated in a rigth wing blog of dubious repute and was magaphoned all over right wing media before it ever hit CNN.

You can't spin that no matter how hard you try.

Exposing the theme of a thred as bogus and outing the sources is not off topic.

 

I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

 

Whether it is dismissed or denied, the result is still the same.

 

Well you would think common sense would tell you that. Only a freakin criminal or an idiot would try and defend someone breaking the law.

What I am tired of is racist ass conservatives who come on these freakin forums and try to label all black folks as this or that, especially when they probably don't even know two black people personally.

That was the freakin point when the dude posted that BS.

Choir boy my butt, I have never labeled the young man as anything. If Officer Wilson shot killed this young man within the guidelines of the law then dammit so be it, but if he murdered this kid then dammit he should face the Bar of Justice.

 

Quid pro quo. I will sue the laws you want against you except mine will be much more effective because I will be hitting what matters most to posters such as you and Mac, $$$$$$$$

the chances of any protest would at least been delayed or non esistent, which would have not resulted in the rioting. Covering up the body will not, in your opinion, contaminate the scene or the evidence.

Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat, which was in front of the bus. Her feet was tired and she did not think it was right. But obviously ou do apparently.

The people coming from out of town shows you the power of the internet. And although most were from not the same city, most did live in the same county or the surrounding counties.

It really depends on the police procedure. In SAPD and in DPD, if he body is in a public area, the body must be covered. This does several things. IT first preserves the evidence of the body and second it stops the gossiping among the spectators whenever there is a crime scene. in said public areal. Finally, covering up the body protects the dignity and privacy of the victim no who shot shom and why the person was shot..

Someone who knows

 

What tampering with evidence? The obdy was on hard concrete in the middle of the street/walkway. The person was shot and killed. Covering up the body would have saved a lot of people trouble, especially the police. And ruing that time, no one was allowed to touch the body while the Uncle of the teen came within 3 feet of the body.