DOJ: .61 Percent Of Students Are Sexually Assaulted

http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/12/doj-less-than-1-percent-of-students-are-sexually-assaulted/

I have always questioned the fact how campus might be more dangerous than streets for a young girl. Of course, there are college parties and stuff like that, but I doubted all that could influence the amount of crimes significantly.
It seems that my doubts were quite reasonable and we were lied to. Don’t like that, actually. As well as I don’t like when the feminist movement is discredited.

 

The only problem is that a guy doing a double-take when a good looking female walks by is said to be a sexual assault.

 

Half as many girls in college are assaulted than not in college...

Is this to suggest that the number of girls in or out is 50\50? I don't think it is, and do not like the contrast in this way.

 

From the story: " After adjusting for the different number of people in each group, women not attending college were almost 25 percent more likely to be victims of assault, although in 2013 there was no difference in victimization rates between the two groups."

 

Thanks for linking that. It's important that the feminist lie narratives on sexual abuse are brought into the light of day. They harm all of us culturally and monetarily, women, men and children, ALL OF US, not just men.

The way the bogus survey studies are slanted to exaggerate is by asking vague questions and allowing biased interviewers to decide whether a respondent has been sexually abused as opposed to the respondent themselves. In many cases, followup oversight studies have found the "abuse and rape victims" happily married to their rapist. Here are some of the questions they use to lie:

"Have you ever had sex and regretted it later?"
"Have you ever been persuaded into having sex when you didn't really want to?"
"Have you ever had sex while intoxicated?"
"Has anyone ever touched you in an offensive way?"

The feminists will change their narrative not one iota in response to real numbers such as in the OP. They rationalize the truth in all kinds of amusing ways, "1 in 100" simply doesn't carry the oomph as "1 in 5" does on a placard, and feminists are all about appearance over truth.

 

Being a woman, I nevertheless agree with you.
I mean, there are guys that make you feel terrible when looking at you (you know, this sticky slimy type of looks when a girl can feel one undressing her with his eyes), but still it's not an assault. It's an unpleasant thing, it's often disgusting, and we need to bring up our children the way they will never look at a girl like that, but it's not an assault.
Such accusation destroy the healthy relationship environment between men and women, I think. We shouldn't make our men be afraid to look at women. And women shouldn't be scared to be looked at.

 

"Has a man ever bought you an alcoholic drink and you later ended up having sex with that man ? If yes, you have been a victim of sexual assault."

This is an actual question used in these faux-studies by feminists to come up with the evidence that 50% of college females are assaulted.

 

Society has suffered due to the lack of morals and individual accountability. Thanks liberals.

 

This is what puzzles me. Women spend massive amounts of money in order to look good and be attractive. They go out of their way to attract the attention of men. Then when they get what they want, they claim that they are being victimized in some way.

 

The bolded portion is not always linked. Sometimes a women likes to get dressed up and look good, just to feel good about themselves. Not to attract a man.

That is the distinction that is missed by many.

 

Which is exactly why the study is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

I got drunk and had sex with someone I wouldn't usually even consider, does that mean I am a victim of sexual assault? Does that mean I should play the victim card? Or maybe next get drunk and horny? LOL

 

I dress up and expose my tattoos, people ask me about them, these questions make me uneasy, what is the best way to avoid people talking to me about my tattoos?

If you don't want people looking at your breasts, then don't wear clothes that leave your breasts hanging out. Its pretty simple.

 

Society has suffered due to lack of intelligence. Thanks conservatives.

- - - Updated - - -

Don't get tattoos. Pretty simple.

 

according to those questions... I've been sexually assualted.


I have clearly demonstrated, that a past experience, where I chose to get drunk, and a fat cow of a girl that I had a blind date with the previous night agreed to get up out of bed, get dressed, and come get me from the party and drive me home. When she got me there, we had sex.


I clearly demonstrated that if our genders were reversed, and a guy did that for a girl, people on this board thought it was date rape. When they figured out that I was a male, they called me an alcoholic and maybe not drink so much if I don't want to end up in bed with someone I don't want to sleep with sober. (funny, when someone suggests that a girl not get too drunk at a party, they are called misogynistic, but it's apparently ok to say it to a guy.)



The dishonest part of the entire drunk is rape argument is noone is suggesting that if a guy sees a girl passed out on the floor, that it's ok to have sex with her. Noone is suggesting roofies are ok.

What is being suggested that if a girl is drunk, and begging you for the dick and then regrets cheating on her b/f with you (or the b/f finds out about it and is about to dump her cheating ass), that's not rape.

- - - Updated - - -

that's like saying , "if you don't want to get raped.... wear panties and don't go to frat parties.


Both will accomplish the desired goal... (not getting asked about tattoos by covering up, not getting raped by limiting access)

 

From Todd "legimiate rape" Akin.....to "The Daily Caller"....

anybody notice how the Right dismisses rape.....unless of course its an unfounded charge they can use politically.

 

Monica Lewinsky, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, etc. Who ignores rape?

 

Monica Lewinsky and Paula Jones were raped? And Juanita Broaddrick wasn't exactly credible...

 

it's sexual harrassment.... a boss, a subordinate.... power balance issues and that would qualify for these studies.

 

Why do so many people see this need to nit-pick the truth?

 

Actually, there are feminists who are considered mainstream who have made the claim that all sex is rape.

 

Maybe people should just mind their own business?

When people I don't know come up and ask me questions about the way I look, my first response isn't 'how can I change to stop this from happening' but 'ok, go away'.

- - - Updated - - -

Because it's a blanket statement that furthers the idea that it is true in all ways, when it isn't.

 

It's hard to understand why some people do things to attract attention then cry foul when they attract attention.

 

Cite any "dismissal" of rape in this thread or retract.

 

I agree with your point, however, it's different with women and exposing a lot of their breasts. Those are parts of the body that some (not me, lol) consider to be offensive if exposed. Just sayin'

 

And don't dress in a way that draws attention if you do not want attention.

Pretty simple.