Liberals to blame for cop killings

Ah, typical lib tact. When you have no argument, nitpick grammar and punctuation.

 

We call that the soft bigotry of low expectations.

White liberals view blacks as inferior and needing standards lowered for them.

 

Which one? The current one? I changed it earlier.

 

This one. The pittie with the tongue. I don't remember your previous one. I have a short attention span.

 

Libs live in a bizarro world where thugs are totally innocent if they're black -- the opposite of reality.

 

White people don't break the law.

When did liberals complain about police officers doing their jobs?

Are all liberals "morons" or just the ones who don't share your anti-black sentiment?

As somebody from the left who never did this, I'd have to disagree with you.

Well, at least you aren't using inflammatory rhetoric, huh.

 

Then it seems as if poverty isn't part of your culture, so this isn't too relevant.

Getting a job isn't so easy in an area where potential employers insist that you're sub-human.

 

I wonder if the Killer had bought his pistol legally.
And why hasn't that been brought up.I think it of key importance.
If that Black vile punk used a stolen weapon or it wasn't his, then
that needs to be reported and right quick. Because the left is already making
headlines about how this proves we need newer and tougher Gun control.

 

and what business would want to open in a crime riddled area so they can be shoplifted, robbed, looted, or set on fire
Blacks have no one to blame put them selves for no jobs in their neighborhoods

 

I've heard Right Wingers call for violence against minorities, gays, Muslims etc. So should every Conservative be blamed for every attack on a minority, gay or Muslim? Of course not.

 

I didn't feel like arguing with his other bull(*)(*)(*)(*). However, when someone uses the now abused 'Democrat' in lieu of the proper 'Democratic', it exposes one of two possibilities:

1) The person's source of news and information. "Democrat Party" or "Democrat (noun)" is an epithet. An insult devised by right wingers who actually know better. The lemmings merely continue that usage, knowingly or not. Usually not. OR
2) The person's ignorance of proper grammar and the English language. However, your English teacher didn't teach you that use. You either never learned it or forgot it. Most probably, the latter from the unending RW diatribes.

Actually, I believe it's a combination of both. Being a mental lemming where the Hannitys and Limbaughs of the world tell you what to think, what to say and how to say it. A weak and malleable mind leads to that ignorance. And apparently, rightwingthink.

 

Let's take a step back. In the previous post I'm not bringing skin colour into the equation.

I'm saying people who live in areas where poverty is an issue they may need more help to get a job and to live a stable life. This will benefit not only the people receiving the support that they need but the entire country as a whole. When people have jobs they are not relying on government benefits, they are not committing crimes to earn a living and they are contributing to the economy.

These areas where there is high unemployment people often have personal problems as well. This also explains why those areas might be violent. In helping these people violent crime rate can be reduced and protect society as a whole.

Why those areas are in poor conditions? I personally do not know. It could be a combination of factors. Investment I think is one solution to the problem.

Everyone needs help. You needed help at a young age to get educated. I'm assuming your education was free? Not everyone can get on their own two feet and make significant changes to their lifestyles. I'm not saying we should throw money at these people and the whole mess will be sorted out itself.

All I see here is some people playing the blame game and not offering solutions. Every time these issues arise all I see is both sides (liberals and republicans) quickly blame each other and use all sorts of rhetoric in order to score political points which achieves absolutely nothing. Statement such as ''I can do this so anyone else can'' is not a solution either.

 

She is trolling. Pretty simple.

 

If they don't represent the vast majority of Americans, then you can't say anything extra-ordinary about them if the original comment was about Americans in general.

 

Fixed your question for you.

Watts, Detroit, et al, have never recovered from the riots of the 1960's.

...

 

No actually the use of 'Democrat' is quite deliberate. If you want to take it as an insult, be our guest.

Semantics. The last refuge of the scoundrel.

 

To some extent, defense of oneself is a natural right. I know that's not a popular view in many places in the world.
If the police are given a job to grab people and throw them into prison, then the type of laws that are in place have some bearing on where the blame should be assigned. You can't morally put all the blame on the person who broke the laws, not when criminals are made out of people who did not really do anything bad.

Just my thoughts.

 

It isn't semantics. It's simple grammar. For semantics to apply, one has to actually understand the language. Obviously, that is not the case here.

The words "I seen that" tells one something about the messenger. So does 'democrat blacks' or 'democrat party'.

On the deliberateness, I believe it to be the sheer ignorance of the conservative lemming mentality. But if you guys wish to present yourself as a bunch of uneducated goobers, go for it. You're doing just fine!

Does you understood, now?

 

And you would have it that the liberals have every media outlet there is, all covering Obama's behind. Thanks to Fox News, your ilk does NOT have a monopoly on every channel there is in America.

Mod edit,,2,,flounder

 

Poverty and lack of investment maybe, but not "discrimination". Brown V Board of Education was resolved in 1954. There've been several decades of educated black people. What's a shame is that their communities actively dis-engage from education. What more can we possibly do? I mean, really.

At this point "Discrimination", "White Privilege" etc are words for a boogeyman that simply doesn't exist. Now, look into the closets and what do you REALLY see.

 

That's a lie.

 

you dont need help to not commit crime. Poor has nothing to do with acting like a barbaric thug. There are poor people all over the globe that would love to have the advantages of our inner city youth like running water and public school. Somehow far poorer people are able to not act like animals.

 

Closed thread, rule 11
flounder