Iran+Obama=New Alliance against police?

http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/29/world/meast/ayatollah-tweet-abdelaziz/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Not only did Obama take the sides of protesters against police, but now it seems the Ayatollah of Iran has too. Who would have thought that by 2015 Obama would make friends with Iran, and turn the nation against police?

 

Obama has not made friends with Iran, Iran have recently made that clear when they started independently conducting airstrikes against IS and stating they did so without U.S co-operation. Most U.S politicians realise to stay in power they have to bend the knee to their Zionist paymasters, in order to maintain themselves they must maintain a ziofriendly foreign policy which means persistent political, economic and military confrontations with Israel's rivals and neighbours.

 

Its almost like a fundamental transformation......

 

I am starting to believe the Conservatives when they say that Obama is intentionally destroying America. I mean, who the hell does stuff like this? Obviously not someone who cares about our image.

Obama sent THREE white house delegates to mike browns (attempted cop killer) funeral. He played golf during the fallen hero cops' funerals AND when the highest ranking officer (General) had his funeral.

That does not scream "I love America". Those actions scream "F($& You!!!"

 

wow the idiot right is really ginning up the sheep again...........
there needs to be a special ward to detox for these victims of the right wing noise machine.

 

So how does this mean anything bad on Obama's part? The Ayatollah is his own person, capable of making his own decisions. Good for him to be standing up for justice, he even mentioned Jesus.

 

You're right. It's a good thing that Obama is sticking up for the Hands up don't shoot crowd. Meanwhile, they burn down cities.

Yea, he's just "standing up" for "innocent" people!

Lol go play outside kid

 

Yeah, all those cities, burning to the ground... Meanwhile
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/terror-from-the-right
"On Sunday, Jerad and Amanda Miller, a married couple, allegedly killed two police officers in an ambush at a Las Vegas pizza restaurant and then murdered another person in an adjacent Walmart. During the attack, the couple reportedly stated that their attack was part of a "revolution," according to Second Assistant Sheriff Kevin McMahill"
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/10/opinion/bergen-las-vegas-shooting-right-wing-extremists/

Seems to be so.

Cold, and sciatica

 

Can you tell me what was on the video in the convenience store 20 minutes before he was killed? Could it be?? NO!!! Mike Brown assaulting a small business clerk???? No wait, he's innocent and just a little boy!!

 

Moot. 100% moot.

 

Lol it's "moot"? Or he was a criminal? Answer me this, was he, or was he not a criminal?

 

Was Wilson pulling him over because of a store robbery, or was it because Brown was jaywalking?

 

Either are probably cause to stop someone. Both are against the law. It was stupid of attempted-murderer brown to try and kill the cop. Glad he's where he belongs. Imagine how many people he could have killed had he SUCCESSFULLY taken the officer's gun? How many cops would you prefer he kill?

 

So yes, Wilson pulled him over jaywalking, not a store robbery? Is that correct?

 

Where did you come up with that from army soldiers post, little twisting of words wouldn't you say?

 

Yes, that is 100% correct. I am not arguing that. He told them to get out of the street (what idiot walks in the middle of the road, lol?). HOWEVER, Wilson was contacted by dispatch about the robbery when he was talking to Brown. So he THEN knew he had the robbery suspect.

"On a hot August day, Wilson drove down a street and spotted two young black men walking down the middle of the road. One wore a black shirt. The other held cigarillos. The details of a robbery earlier that day, blared out on a police radio, clicked into Wilson’s head. Were they suspects? He told the two young men, one of whom was Brown, to move to the sidewalk."

He stopped them for jaywalking, ended up finding out they are hardned criminals. The Brown tried to kill him.

-http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/11/25/why-darren-wilson-said-he-killed-michael-brown/

 

It's getting an answer to my question. He didn't answer that time, so I'm trying to pin him into a yes or no answer.

 

Thank you, all you had to say.

So what you're saying is that a man who has time to come up with a narrative, a pretty good reason to have said his side of the story sooner, and a narrative article is proof? If this was his excuse, we would have heard about this sooner.

 

So are you debating that the shots taken inside the police cruiser were NOT because Mike Brown was trying to reach for the gun (which witness- the ones who didn't get caught lying- said)?

 

I don't know why there gunshots in the car. Maybe Wilson was playing a weird game of Russian roulette beforehand. I'm saying that if he wanted to say that he pulled them over for robbing a store, that would have been one of the first talking points to have come out.

 

Obama is even talking about putting an embassy back in Iran. I can see more American hostages taken and another president having to deal with it.

 

burn down cities? I am so thankful I never had to serve with just out and out liars like you.

 

Not me. I thought he would have accomplished that by 2009.

 

Were you always this much of a dramaqueen or did you turn sissy when you left the service?

Ferguson was firebombed, small businesses burned to the ground. Cars, firebombed. Homes destroyed. Are you denying this? Please tell me little princess, which part of this am I "lying" about?

 

No one is arguing that. He pulled them over for jaywalking, got the call that brown robbed the store and beat the heck out of a poor indian family man, and then brown tried to brutally kill Wilson. Pretty simple scenario, which is why our Hero Wilson is not in trouble.