I wouldnt support her because of her stances to begin with. Bills actions and her sticking by him is just extra ammo. Heck they were made for each other.
Yeah but it's not exactly fair to blame her either for something she didn't do. - - - Updated - - - You base your claims on what evidence exactly?
Bills actions? A bit of sex here and there? Far better that consensual sex is performed than constant acts of war. It's time Americans got their priorities right.
Apparently the flight logs have been released in .pdf format: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1507315-epstein-flight-manifests.html It's not like Bill would do something like this, right? I mean, this is Bill we're talking about here. I'm sure it's all a huge coincidence.
Folks in Arkansas were so happy Bill Clinton was elected President, as it meant the state was somewhat rid of both of them. Hillary has ridden her hubby's coat tails her whole married life and she is deftly aware of Bill's transgressions. For her to continue to stand by her man is the height of feminist hypocrisy and the very definition of political self interest.
Oh here you go again! Your reverse psychology is so old! You need to come up with something fresh. You are a bore
American's aren't like the arrogant and rudderless French, I think this will hurt Hillary pretty badly. It's also following the typical format where more evidence comes out as time passes.
We are constantly at war now.. Dont get much news in Canada eh? I see you are still trying to deflect though.. clap... clap..
Ahhh smell the desperation of the right wing slander party !! How's fast n furious, solyndra , irs , bengazie, Ebola....how's that working out for ya ? Gop = boy who cried wolf !!
No one has to be bribed. He is a sex addict. Why else would he go? Egomaniacs like Clinton and Obama EXPECT people to cover for them because of "who they are". It should be an honor just to serve them.
Why not? What woman would stay with a man like that unless she is getting something. She has been riding on his political coat tails and loving it for all these years. She is in it with him because she is nothing without him. She is willing to overlook his "faults". It's the company you keep.
Knowing someone & being like them is two different things ... But do continue to slander one of the most popular Presidents in the last 50 years !! You bible thumping hypocrites need to focus on all your little preachers raping little boys , if your so worried about pedophiles!!
Agreed, but she didn't dump him either, I do blame her for that. She portrays the weak female victim instead of a strong willed leader, I think that'll be a problem for her with both men and women. My ex wife of 18 years went under the bus in the blink of an eye as soon as she cheated on me. That was the red line in the sand, she crossed it and overboard she went just like that. Folks that can't stand for something, will fall for anything.
So the next time some preacher gets caught in a sex scandal, you're saying it's okay to focus on Bill Clinton boinking kids? Because that's the logic I'm seeing here.
That's called projection, 3Link. Since it's what a liberal would do it's natural to assume it's what everyone would do. But, we all know the entire scandal will revolve around what the meaning of is is. I don't see why the behavior of her husband, a known sexual predator, would have any bearing on Sen. Clinton's campaign. The liberal media will certainly take care of her.
Of course the US is constantly at war. If not with other countries, then with itself. And true - not much news in Canada. We tend to avoid deliberate conflict for oil. Although I don't know too much about the sexual activities of the Prime Minister. The press doesn't take that much an interest, believing that it's not something that prevents him doing his job.
Lack of evidence does not necessitate innocence. It is still being investigated and it may be proven yet that he was involved. But to declare guilt or innocence at this stage does not make it so.
I don't think she needs to do that, actually. They are more or less 'fine' with adults who engage in underage sex, as long as they're Democrats.
lack of evidence doesn't indicate guilt either, I can think of many crimes a person could of done, but without proof why both assuming them to be true